Search from various English teachers...
Profile
Hello, I am from Taiwan. I wish to meet some language exchange partners. I need to learn Portuguese because I will be attending the 2013 WYD in Rio. Right now, I'm zero in Portuguese, but I'm good at language learning (and quite experienced! ), and I just need to learn some basic pronunciation and conversation on Skype. In return, I can help you with Mandarin. I'm quite good at explaining the nuance of the language, and I would like to share my thoughts on the culture through the usage of this language. Je parle aussi français, si vous préférez communiquer en français. 如果有任何關於中文的問題,我也很樂於提供協助。
Learning
Portuguese
French
English
Language Skills
Chinese (Mandarin)Native
Lesson Feedback
Lesson history
 Last monthLast 3 monthsAll time
Completed lessons000
Attendance rate100%100%100%
Teacher reviews
No record
Activities
  • Posted
    Quelqu'un pourrait-il m'aider à comprendre ce passage? Je suis en train de faire une traduction. Je comprend le texte en gros, mais j'aurais besoin de votre aide pour préciser le sens de certains mots. Voici le texte: "Usé par l’aventure, l’utopie et l’échec, l’Empire, devenu « Libéral », a perdu en autorité sans gagner en popularité. Napoléon III, rongé par la maladie et plus velléitaire que jamais, n’est plus que le jouet de ses illusions." i) Y a-t-il un sens spécifique pour le mot "usé" ici puisqu'on parle d'un gouvernement? ii) Comment traduire le mot "aventure" dans ce passage? iii) Les expressions "être le jouet/la victime de ses illusions" veulent-elles dire la même chose? Merci!
    September 25, 2012
    2
    0
  • Posted
    Can someone correct this for me, please? My boss asked me to write this mail for him. Dear Prof. Smith, It is already the start of term in Taiwan, yet the summer heat has not left! I hope that you had a good summer in Canada. Thank you for your last message concerning your article on Freedom of Religion. You mentioned that you were finishing it. I would like to know if this article has already been sent to the editors or should it take a little more time. Our editors wish to receive all articles before 20 September due to the editorial process. In case of any problem, please feel free to contact me or any of our editors. Thank you again for your help. With all good wishes S.-H. Yan
    September 14, 2012
    2
    0
  • Corrected
    0 voted
    August 3, 2012
    0
  • Answered
    (the following is not a direct answer to your question, but I think it might be interesting from the point of view of language learning.) When it comes to attributes, it is not always necessary to use past tense in Chinese, even if the phrase you have in mind should be said in past tense in your own language. For example, you met someone years ago and now a third person asks you about your opinion of this person. In English you can say something like " He was very nice." or " He was a gentleman.". When you translate these sentences into Chinese, you say "他人很好" "他很紳士的一個人", no adverb of time which indicates the past tense is needed. If you add one of these adverbs in the sentence, "他(曾經/以前/過去/那時)是個很好的人", it means that at this moment you are aware of the fact that he has changed, or he is dead, so your previous judgment does not correspond to the reality. I think this shows that when your way of thinking is formed in a language like Chinese, a judgment is often saved in the form like essence of a person or of a thing, which is no longer in the time. When I discuss philosophy with friends who do not speak Chinese, at the beginning they think I reason in a rather instinctive, subjective way, because in their eyes, I always tend to isolate a fact from its surroundings. It takes me years to spot why do they say so. Well, this reasoning process itself is unconscious of course, and it is not about being right or wrong : it's just a way of thinking. I always have problems with the past tense in English and in French. Now I realize that there is a substantial difference in the way of thinking, the way we make judgments and how we keep them in the form of language. It's more than mere mechanical grammatical difference... The above is just my personal opinion. Hope it could be useful to you in some way. :)
    0 voted
    August 2, 2012
    0
  • Posted
    "suite à" et "à cause de"? Voici un passage tiré d'un mail que j'avais envoyé: "p.-s. suite à ton silence à l'égard de mon dernier mail envoyé il y a un mois et demi, j'ai pris la décision d'arrêter désormais nos correspondances et les contacts, cette décision étant mûrie pendant ce temps de silence." 1.Ai-je tout de même montré la "causalité" entre le silence de l'autre et ma décision en utilisant "suite à" au lieu de "à cause de"? 2.Y-a-t-il une "différence de degré" entre "suite à" et "à cause de"? par "différence de degré", j'entends que l'un indique de manière plus/moins directe la causalité que l'autre.
    July 30, 2012
    4
    0
  • Answered
    它們的意義是一樣的。 如果一定要分,在我個人的用法中,“这使我很高兴”較為正式,“这让我很高兴”較偏向口語。 p.-s.還有另外一個字也是同樣的用法:"这令我很高兴"。
    0 voted
    July 19, 2012
    1
  • Answered
    Even though I understand your phrases, and they are grammatically correct - or should I say, not wrong - personally, I would put it like this: 1.我住的賓館在巴黎中心。 (This sounds more natural to me in a conversation.) 2.我住在一間位於巴黎中心的賓館。 (In writing, adding "位於" (= situated in/ situé + pré.) may no be necessary, but it helps avoiding some ambiguous meaning.)
    0 voted
    July 19, 2012
    0
  • Answered
    Actually, 划 refers to the movement of rowing. It's a verb. 划船means row/paddle a boat.(船=boat) 騎 is the verb "ride". It could be applied to a horse, a motorcycle and of course, a bicycle. So you see, it depends on the means of the transportation for the choice of your verb.
    0 voted
    July 19, 2012
    1