This is my IELTS writing part 2 tests. Could you please correct it? It is generally regarded as social welfare if the government decides to cover the tuition fees of high education. People tend to be happier when they get more benefit from the state. As far as I'm concerned, most students are supposed to pay for the fees on them own while some of whom should get abolition tuition. Most university students are able to afford the tuition fees whether by themselves or from support from their families. If the government bear the fee, it seems unfair for those students who live in poor condition. Because it is unreasonable for both students from wealthy families and poor background get them same amount of financial support. Besides, it would be a great burden on the taxpayers if the government spends too much on education. As a result, some other social problems which are equally important may not get the necessary support. For example, medicare, environmental protection and infrastructure construction. On the other hand, once the students do not need to pay for their study, they may bot value the precious access to high education which results in a low grades. Thus, I suggest that government doesn't need to pay for every student. Considering their living conditions, only those students who are in poverty are supposed to get the tuition support. Also, the government can cover the fees for students with better grades to stimulate hard work.

Could you please correct it? Thx! -Suppose you are asked to give advice on whether to attend a vocational college or a university, write an essay to state your opinion. In China, many people hold a point that students with high grades are supposed to attend a university for further education, while only those who can not study well in high schools would have no choice but to go to a vocational college. I never agree with them. People should view the two choices equally because both of the two kinds of students play vital roles in the society. And whether to attend a vocational college or a university depends solely on the students themselves, but not the grades. As far as I'm concerned, for those students who would like to learn about practical technology and find a fitted post as soon as possible to become more experienced, vocational colleges can suit them well. However, students who expect a more scientific learning environment, easier chances to conduct researches or opportunities to acquire further education, to attend a university can be a better choice. Besides, we should give an equal priority to the two kind of schools cause students are born to be unique and should not be put too much pressure on what they are supposed to do. To sum up, it is of great importance for students to figure out what they really want, what person they expect to be and which position they'd like to take in the future. Only in this way can they take better control of their own life.

Could you please correct it? We often hear such words like "Happiness is not the absence of problems, but the ability to deal with them." Everyone wants to avoid getting into trouble, while the better advice is to learn how to address it. Surrounded by difficulties can be annoying only if you are unable to handle them and happiness is one of the key points. Admittedly, no one can deny that he or she has to face various problems at times, however, it turns out differently. Some have an extreme difficult time in overcoming them, some can even hardly solve them, while others are able to make good use of them, not only handling them successfully but taking a lesson to avoid huger losses. The secret behind it is to be positive. From my daily experience and observation, since you have to face those difficulties whatever, why not be delightful and strong enough to defeat them easily. To sum up, in order to develop the problem-solving ability, we could view the problem as a way to challenge ourselves and imagine the bright tomorrow when we finish it, and the most important, devote full-heartedly into it.