This is my IELTS writing part 2 tests. Could you please correct it? It is generally regarded as social welfare if the government decides to cover the tuition fees of high education. People tend to be happier when they get more benefit from the state. As far as I'm concerned, most students are supposed to pay for the fees on them own while some of whom should get abolition tuition. Most university students are able to afford the tuition fees whether by themselves or from support from their families. If the government bear the fee, it seems unfair for those students who live in poor condition. Because it is unreasonable for both students from wealthy families and poor background get them same amount of financial support. Besides, it would be a great burden on the taxpayers if the government spends too much on education. As a result, some other social problems which are equally important may not get the necessary support. For example, medicare, environmental protection and infrastructure construction. On the other hand, once the students do not need to pay for their study, they may bot value the precious access to high education which results in a low grades. Thus, I suggest that government doesn't need to pay for every student. Considering their living conditions, only those students who are in poverty are supposed to get the tuition support. Also, the government can cover the fees for students with better grades to stimulate hard work.