Class Size Reducation Achieving the quality and quantity demands in an educational system together remains a challenge. Over the past decade, governments had been giving increased attention to build the largest number of schools across nationwide. That is because it had a moral duty to granting equal opportunities in education for its citizens. Now, this political trend has changed little in the past few years. Governments are seeking not only to ensure the social Justice in education, but also they aime to raise the quality of education as a result of economic competitiveness at the global. level. To this end, they have a plan to limit class sizes to a maximum of 15 students. One of advantages of this potential procedure is assisting teachers to distribute their efforts on students equally. So, the academic achievement of students and their ability to absorption of information can be increased. In addition to this, by focusing on every student as individual in classroom, teachers can exploit individual differences between their students to discover talented students and to encourage brainstorming which stimulates creative thinking in class. Moreover, with limited number of students, it will be more easier for teachers to make a control on classroom and school adminstration can accurately observe any abnormal behavior. As a consequence of that, a lot of violent events in schools such as bullying can be disappear. Some opponents argue that it could threat the social justice by excluding some students from going to school, especially if governments are incapable of building more schools to achieve this goal. However, people should also have equal opportunity in the quality of education which only will be attained by this plan. Needless to say, governments must find more creative methods to learn students beyond physical buildings such as electronic learning and outdoor classrooms.

Take a choice: Living in university dormitories or in apartments One of the most important choices that college students make when they go to university is whether they will live in university dormitories or they will live in apartment in the community. To be honest, no one of these two option is totally a perfect choice. So, it's better to show pros and cons of them. Let me start with the option of a university dormitory because it's ,in usual, the most popular choice for college students in my country. It gives students a rational reason to save their time without spending half of their day in transportation means through crowded streets. On the same line, it can save money which is paying for daily travel to university. In addition to low economic costs, living in dormitories makes students feel more safe and secure, with regarding to guards which are surrounding the place. However, it's not the full story. College students are more prone to face issues which are related to their privacies and their freedoms. So, it's not so strange to feel as if you live in barracks there. But anyway, not all college students have this sensitivity. Especially, if we know that almost college students in my country have grown up in authoritative families, so it's not the big issue at all. On the flip side, living in apartment has a plenty of advantages such as having more space to show your personality from the wall of your room to the stairs, meeting your friends at any time, having a pet without objections from an authority or roommates who have animal phobias. Living in apartment, at least as I think, makes life so flexible. Having said this, it's still not a good choice for some of students who are trying to make new friends which is very high probability to happen if they live in dormitories. Besides, it may be a hard decision for those who having no idea about how to get an apartment which is appropriate for their financial means. Nevertheless, I'd rather the last choice because I think it has greet advantages to compensate for its disadvantages. Furthermore, it depends on our desire to live independently and with our own resources which I absolutely favor.

Shelter for abused child If I have a land I will build a shelters for abused children. We live in a danger world where we don't have sure of bringing kids with good parents. Everyday we are read and listen about fathers and mothers who harshly punish their sons and treat them inhumanity. Once those kids grow up, they will act like their parents. To stop this continuous circle of violence, I think it will be better if there are special shelters for them. In these shelters, there will be family therapists and social supporters to determine if abused child needs an educational program or only rising awareness of his/her right. They also can decide the type of support which this child needs. In these shelters, sport clubs and leisure activities _ which is appropriate to child's age_can be established. In addition, it's good to invite great models such as international musicians and peace ambassadors for coming and making a spiritual communication with abused kids to touch their deep wounded soul. Only if it happens, I will start believing in our ability to face terrorism threat!

Zoo has no useful purposes Zoo is not a right place to make people more sympathetic with animals. Conversely, it may send an indirect negative message to our future generation about how they should treat these creatures as if they are created for being under human control. Animals should naturally and freely grow up in the environment in which they are born. One of the most dramatic cases that I watched on "YouTube " was about a child who inadvertently fell out of his mother's hand into the cage of gorilla. At the first moment, the gorilla hold him softly and was trying to settle him, but he kept crying. So, she started to play with him as she is used to do with her babies by holding one of his foot and dragging him around. Anyway, it was a final choice made by her. For protecting the kid, the keeper had to shout her. So it's not so funny to put the life of animals at risk of irresponsible, reckless and curious people. Some argue that zoo gives the best way for education because it provides vivid information about the behavior of animals. However, zoo doesn't like jungles and forests. Then, this unnatural environment may lead to artificial responses. Moreover, technology provides us with another creative ways which are better than zoo like 3D documentary movies.