In terms of writing, they are alternative spelling forms of the same word and both are correct. However, as the pronunciation goes more towards a U sound than an A sound, when you are speaking or writing maybe using " further" and "furthest" would be better. So, in terms of sound it's: base form = far; comparative = further than; superlative = the furthest. Hope this helps

Pokemon

Pokemon, which is very popular AR game around the world. It's released in our country now as well.
Many people play it on the street and become crazy. I also downloaded it, but I am not addicted to it. I just want to know how this game is going. I don't follow popularity blindly.

Pokémon, which is very popular AR game around the world, has also been released in our country. Lots of people are now playing  in the streets though some have  become crazy and wild about it. I have also downloaded it, too. However, I am not addicted to this game but I do want to keep up to date with what’s going on with it. In any case, I am essentially just curious though I certainly don't want to follow popularity blindly just to fit in with the crowd. 

Hello everyone, I’ll be graduating this year and I'm currently adding the finishing touches to my graduation project (when you say “my graduation project” do you mean “my thesis” ? If so substitute) <o:p></o:p>

However, while I am writing the thesis/project in French, an abstract written in English will need to be presented, too. Unfortunately, my academic writing skills in English are not as good as they might need to be so I was hoping someone might help me correct the abstract for any errors or even suggest more academically appropriate lexico-grammatical alternatives. Thanks in advance.

<o:p>
</o:p>

<o:p>( I have done a rewrite to correct information flow problems)</o:p>

 

The El-Kendi pharmaceutical company is currently in the process of adopting a centralised warehousing and storage policy. Although this involved notable investment, it will also lead to the optimization of storage.  The aim of this project/thesis is to design a warehouse that will meet the company’s requirements over the coming years. Thus, the proposed design will adhere to the storage specifications provided by the company and will also include a detailed comparison of the operational and logistic costs between this future centralised warehousing policy and the current decentralised one. Payback time on investment will also be estimated, with a detailed report being presented on why it is in the interests of the company to continue its pursue and investment in a centralised warehousing policy.  

<o:p></o:p>

Starving Angels

They woke up because of hunger again. They thought they would have got used to it, but they didn't. Trying to cheer themselves up, they checked the school's free lunch menu and pictured the delicious meal they could only have that day.
These little angels can be found in any corner of the world. They manage to be content with what they have and cherish everything offered just like what they've promised God to do. But it seems that their prayers aren't answered this time. Soon, there won't be such free lunch for them anymore because of an impetuous budget cut by the government.

Hunger woke them up once again. They though they would have been used to it by now, but they weren't.

( note 1  become is probably better than get in prose; note 2 it would probably be a good idea to define the main actors. In other words, who are the people? Young schoolchildren? Nursery infants? etc - note 3  would have become used to ....is set in the past of the past (pluperfect or past perfect) and implies they still weren't used to it. Therefore, grammatically you need the past simple finite  weren't in the clause "but they weren't. Keep the four main time zones  in mind:  past perfect - past - present - future note 4 I have made "Hunger" the subject of the sentence to give it more thematic power in the flow of your discourse.   )

Trying to cheer themselves up, they checked the school's free lunch menu and pictured the delicious meal they would be having  that day.

( they are not eating yet, so the action of eating will actually happen in the future. However, the main time frame for the narrative is in the past simple hence they would be eating.  if you were in the present time frame, you might say something " I can just imagine what we are going to be eating later/will be eating later)   

These little angels can be found in any corner of the world. They manage to be content with what they have and cherish everything offered just like what they've promised God to do. ( The clause I have crossed out doesn't make any logical sense, even if you make the grammatical adjustment just as promised God they would do/or would have done. Perhaps you could try to reconnect it in some way) 

But is seems that their prayers aren't going to be answered this time 'round/ haven't been answers this time 'round.  

But it seems that their prayers aren't answered this time. ( Note 1 You have changed time frame, which as a literary device is quite OK, but you have to adjust everything else, too. Now you are in the present time, which gives dramatic effect, so you need a future tense for the main proposal in the clause.

Soon, there won't be any more such free lunches for them anymore because of an impetuous budget cut by the government.

note 1 It is very easy to confuse the adverb anymore with the nominal elements any more.  2. the term impetuous doesn't really collocate very well here. In short impetuous  implies hast, speed, rush, hurry, etc.   Perhaps terms like insensitive, uncaring etc  might be more suitable. You could even omit the adjective and let the reader draw their own conclusions, which are quite obvious.