그 만화에서는 파티 있습니다. 많은 사람들을 초대했습니다. 그 사람들이 현관에서 와인과 맥주를 마시고 수다떱니다. 나중에 로브스터를 먹을 것입니다. 사람들이 재미 있으면서 부엌에서 물이 끓이지만 창문으로 로브스터들이 도망가고 있십니다!

Salut Jessica, Tout d'abord, le verbe s'écrit "rater" (O) et non "râter" (X). Manquer: On peut manquer *de* quelque-chose: "Je manque de temps" "I don't have enough time" On peut manquer *à* quelqu'un (indirect object): "Tu me manques" "I miss you" (in English it's said the other way around) On peut manquer quelque-chose (direct object): "J'ai manqué le bus" "I missed the bus" (the one you're asking about) Rater a plus souvent le sens d'échouer ("fail"), mais peut s'utiliser aussi autrement: On peut rater quelque-chose (direct object) qui se produit sans nous ou passe sans nous rencontrer: "J'ai raté le bus" "I missed the bus" (also the one you're asking about) On peut rater une tâche, la laissant inaccomplie ou mal faite: "J'ai raté la peinture" "I screwed up the painting" On peut rater sans objet: "Je rate à tout coup" "I always miss" In English for clarity: So, for events, chances and opportunities, you could both use "rater" and "manquer": "J'ai raté l'opportunité" "I missed the opportunity" OR "J'ai manqué l'opportunité" "I missed the opportunity" Je soupçonne que chaque nom a une tendance à aller avec un verbe plutôt que l'autre selon la région du locuteur. Par exemple, "j'ai manqué l'autobus" me parrait plus naturel que "j'ai raté l'autobus", mais "j'ai raté l'opportunité" m'apparait plus naturel que "j'ai manqué l'opportunité". Dans tous les cas, les deux sont corrects.

Hi, I'm a learner myself, so take this with a grain of salt: "All verbs and adjectives whose stem ends with a ㄹ 받침 are irregular." ( https://www.koreanwikiproject.com/wiki/%E3%84%B9_irregular_verbs) That means that all verbs and adjectives that end in ㄹ lose the ㄹ in many conjugated forms, namely, when it would be followed by ㄴ, ㅂ, or ㅅ. Wiktionary shows that the present determiner form (the form used to modify a noun) is 낯선, which seems to confirm that, in this instance, the ㄹ is dropped.

In each case, you would be understood but the sentences would feel wrong. For abstract levels, like these, "on" is usually used. The only exception I can think of is "at X level", meaning an attainment, something that one reaches. For exemple: "He's really good at tennis. I wish I could play at his level." Prepositions are very idiomatic, so often one must just learn which preposition comes with which expression.

The general meaning is the same: all three sentences refer to the 24th of December. However, while the first two sentences mean more or less the same thing (substract one day from Christmas on the calendar and any day that matches that will do, it just happens there is only one), the third sentence singles out that particular day. Maybe one wants to put emphasis on how tragic it is to die on that particular day. Any of those sentences could replaces the others without loss of meaning.

"In between" indicates that something is placed after some thing A and before some thing B. For instance, in the word "album", the letter L is between the letter A and the letter B. It is normally used with physical objects. For instance, in a sandwich, the meat is placed between two slices of bread. It can also be used with locations. We can say that something is "between here and there", meaning that you will encounter that thing somewhere along the way from "here" to "there". Note that "between" and "in between" mean the same thing, unless you use "between" to compare two things, which you cannot do with "in between". The "in" in "in between" is non-standard and superfluous, but it is commonly heard.