This is part of an essay. Would it be possible someone helps me just with the grammar? Thus, while nobody is able to come up with a better solution, I consider implementing mixed residential areas would be a right direction to follow. (final part of the essay).

This is a part of an opinion essay. Would it be possible someone help me with the correct grammar? ...As a result, these factors could diminish marginalization and improve the security, reducing costs to society. Admittedly, opponents say that the problem lies with the poverty and not where people live. What is more, they say that low-income earners have different demands from those of high-income. Although these issues should be solved, I think that mixed living is advantageous to the poor and rich, even if it does not eliminate the poverty. Indeed, it is a win-win situation, giving them greater chances to understand each other better and creating more quality of conditions for both of them. Even though it is unsure that mixed living communities could lessen the gap between low-income and high-income population, I believe it is worth a try because of the many advantages that this model claims to bring to the quality of life, not only for the poor, but also to the rich...

This is a part of an opinion essay. Would it be possible someone help me with the correct grammar? Should we create more socially mixed residential areas, where rich people live next to poorer people, instead of in separate communities? This is a question that instigates debate by scholars and responsible for elaborating urban policies. Given the existence of diverse social classes, it becomes necessary to establish a way of tackling these differences in terms of urban planning. However, which model of living areas would reveal more beneficial to the citizens? In my opinion, socially mixed residential areas would bring more positive results. Reports show that many cities around the world have adopted this proposal. Paris and some cities in China are examples with the promise of good outcomes. Low-income employees could avoid long commutes as they would live near their workplace. The same resources and facilities would be available for all residents in the neighbourhood. This model would promote integration and connection between communities.