What is much easier? To learn in a small class or in a larger one? Generally speaking, I believe that it is better for all concerned if students have a quiet and comfortable atmosphere in class regardless if class is large or small. However, it is true that normally a large class is synonymous with a poor learning. First of all, class size is an important factor to consider when choosing a school`s effectiveness but is not the only one. Other important factors are illumination, quality of the teaching, extra-activities and so on. However, class size can be decisive in our learning. By way of example, I can recall when I was in high school. At that time, I was sixteen and I was in a very large classroom. The class was full of students speaking aloud and I was at the end of the class. For me, because of the distance to the blackboard and because of the high level of noise, it was totally impossible to learn nothing during that year, so it was a complete waste of time. In addition, in a small class is easier to be in touch with teachers and classmates. It is more likely that teachers remember your name and it is more feasible make friends. On the other hand, it is true that in a small class there are fewer people than in a large one, and it is less likely to meet people more akin to you. Finally, from my point of view, it is necessary to have a balance in class size, I think that a class up to 20 is perfect to gain achievements in learning. Lately, in my university, size´s classes have been increased significantly from approximately forty to over a hundred, so I can say, as a first hand witness, that quality of learning has dramatically declined. For this reasons I believe,. By way of conclusion, based on the arguments explored above, I am of the opinion that, the larger the class, the more difficult is to be concentrated and more difficult to get better results in the learning process.

Instant Messenger-Please, help me to revise it Since the dawn of time, mankind has always been trying to communicate among them. Firstly, our ancestors communicated each other through face expressions, grunts and gestures in every situation, albeit mainly in activities related to courtship display, scent-marking or to show force and authority. However, through communications humans have been able to exchange emotions, feelings, knowledge, and culture and so on. Over the years, different civilizations began to spread along the territories for hunting, gathering or conquering so they needed an organized system of communication that would allow them an effective control of these new territories. The smoke signals is one of the oldest forms of long-distance communication and one of the most known. It is a form of visual communication employed over long distance. Actually, smoke signals were used to transmit news, the proximity of a danger, or even to gather people to a common area. Amerindian made huge bonfires and used the smoke to made signals in order to communicate with other tribe headmen in case of war. Sometimes the signals arrived late or had a different meaning as wind distorted them. Communicating by letters has existed from the time of ancient India or ancient Egypt and they have been used intensely during the years. However this method has become less important as a routine way of communication. . Roman used to send letters to share information through all over the empire. It took a large time to communicate and could have catastrophic consequences if they weren´t in time, especially with important task. The development of the telegraph was a huge advance since the time necessary to communicate something was considerably shortened. It was then the turn of: the fax which enhanced the exchange of information. The problem was that these actions took a long time, they weren´t as accuracy as should be, and it wasn´t either a secure way of transmitting information. However, the new progress on remote technologies has changed the way people communicate themselves. Today, you can share words, pictures, or videos with somebody wherever both you are and whenever you want. Some people say that instant messaging is the text version of a phone call. The immediacy and effectiveness with which it is possible to obtain information using these tools have made several companies prefer to manage their relationships with partners, suppliers or colleagues using these new tools.

Instant Messenger parte 2/2. Could anybody correct this?. Greetings & Thanks! Nowadays there are many tools like WhatsApp, BBM, Google Hangouts, Skype, line an others safer like Spotbros, GroupMe or Viber. Thanks to all of these applications everyone can send urgent information instantly, some companies may answer their questions much faster, saving time and money. Another example of application can be education; the teacher may create working groups to solve any questions. It is also a good way of communication between student and teacher and between a student and his classmates. Another important application is sending your location. For instance, With WhatsApp you can create groups up to 50 people to share photos, videos, audio files or contacts and, of course, writing from anywhere in the world at any time( the messages are transmitted in real time). Furthermore, this application is relatively stable and offers the immediacy that is often needed in some jobs.

Instant Messenger parte 1/2. Could anybody correct this?. Greetings & Thanks! Since the dawn of time, mankind has always been trying to communicate among them. Firstly, our ancestors communicated each other through face expressions, grunts and gestures in every situation, albeit mainly in activities related to courtship display, scent-marking or to show force and authority. However, through communications humans have been able to exchange emotions, feelings, knowledge, and culture and so on. Over the years, different civilizations began to spread along the territories for hunting, gathering or conquering so they needed an organized system of communication that would allow them an effective control of these new territories. The smoke signals is one of the oldest forms of long-distance communication and one of the most known. It is a form of visual communication employed over long distance. Actually, smoke signals were used to transmit news, the proximity of a danger, or even to gather people to a common area. Amerindian made huge bonfires and used the smoke to made signals in order to communicate with other tribe headmen in case of war. Sometimes the signals arrived late or had a different meaning as wind distorted them. Communicating by letters has existed from the time of ancient India or ancient Egypt and they have been used intensely during the years. However this method has become less important as a routine way of communication. . Roman used to send letters to share information through all over the empire. It took a large time to communicate and could have catastrophic consequences if they weren´t in time, especially with important task. The development of the telegraph was a huge advance since the time necessary to communicate something was considerably shortened. It was then the turn of: the fax which enhanced the exchange of information. The problem was that these actions took a long time, they weren´t as accuracy as should be, and it wasn´t either a secure way of transmitting information. However, the new progress on remote technologies has changed the way people communicate themselves. Today, you can share words, pictures, or videos with somebody wherever both you are and whenever you want. Some people say that instant messaging is the text version of a phone call. The immediacy and effectiveness with which it is possible to obtain information using these tools have made several companies prefer to manage their relationships with partners, suppliers or colleagues using these new tools.

Preparing for the FCE. Please, could you correct it? THE MAN WITH NO FACE I pushed open the door.The house was empty but I could see that someone or something had been there and had only just left. I nervously came into the house on tiptoe little by little,I was looking for something weird wich could help me to know what is happening inside. Suddenly I heard a devil shout on the second floor. I went there as fast as I could and when I reached the second floor I did not see anything.I kept walking arround the second floor and then I saw a sign on the ground.It had a hand shape and it was done with blood.I bended down to check it, but just then I heard the ceiling to crackle I looked at there and there was a mas with no face. I started to run how I had never done it before. I reached the street but to my surprise a car ran over me. Now, I am in the hospital recovering my health and wondering what the hell happened that day. The doctor has just leave about five minutes.I am alone in the room. -it is weird, the door is openning slowly...Oh no!! oh my god!! it is the man with no face !!!

it is better to live in a flat,a modern house or and old house? By way of introduction,I would like to live in and old house outside the city with a thick forest close to it. On the one hand,in a modern house ,you will have many comforts owing to its latest technology and you could have to show your wealth in your neighborhood and you maybe become the most popular of your town. On the other hand,in my opinion a modern house has not almost character, however the character of an old house endures for long time. I do not like a flat neither as it normally is a city and I can not stand hearing noises during the whole day. For these reasons I would not live neither a modern house nor a flat. What do you think about?