The comparison between the distant-learning and the traditional college education The arriving of the Internet has changed people's working and living styles. Nowadays, more and more people tend to receive remote education, because this education system enables individuals obtain a diploma successfully at home. Although distant-learning education differs from the traditional college education, the former one possesses its own merits. Compared with traditional education, distance education is more flexible, thereby making more people accepting education possible. The distant-learning students can study by watching videos, which can be paused and replay times when the students encounter issues, until they understand the content in videos completely. Meanwhile, courses of the remote education could be accessed 24 hours every day and 7 days every week, so this is an ideal approach for students who are seldom available, as long as they have the access to the Internet. The development of the remote education also enable the tutors and the students interact seamlessly. Students can inquire questions in the virtual classroom by interactive communication tools, as well as sending email, therefore, they can get the guidance from the teachers as to complete the courses smoothly. Even more, they can communicate with scholars from reputable institutions over the globe, though these scholars are not actually in site. On the other hand, the primary deficiency of the distant-learning is students' communication skills could not be improved because generally there is no group assignment in the virtual classroom. Moreover, students finish their work independently. As a result, those who rarely have the chance to know other classmates would not be able to build up a network of contacts, which might impact these students' work life adversely. Remote education allows college eduction more accessible, because of its flexibility. However, this education system also has its shortages, like the lack of interaction, so it would not bring out the equal learning outcomes to the traditional college education.

Do laws restrict our freedom? Laws are the rules what are enacted to impose on people or protect people's rights. Although people's freedom are restricted in some extent by laws, I still believe they are essential in regulating people's behaviour. If citizens obey the rules and regulations, society could be kept in order, and the economy could be developed prosperously. In contrast, the traffic accident would increase and the traffic congestion would become a severe problem if somebody behaves against traffic rules. People who sell the fake and inferior products on the Internet should be punished by laws, otherwise consumers would not dare to buy anything online, thus impact the economy adversely. With the restriction of laws, people can also live in a harmonious and closely-knit society to enjoy their life. Like sometimes people are likely to be motivated by self-interest to do something harmful to others. If they abide by the regulations, they will respect and get alone with others well. Admittedly, laws are inevitably restrain individuals' freedom sometimes, even hamper the social development. For instance, the commercial activities would not be prosperous while various restrictions was imposed to the market by the government. High income earners have to subject to a considerable amount of incoming tax required by laws. As a result, people tend to miss out motivation to put in their effort to promote the income. The state should relieve some limitation to encourage people's revolution and creation which will be beneficial to the development of society. It is reasonable to conclude that society could not run stably without laws which primary purpose is to maintain a peaceful life for individuals, though these rules curb people to act at will.

Do we need a more expensive air travel? Cheap flights make us traveling across border in a low price possible, which I think is beneficial to the public, though we should reduce the unnecessary travel by air. People could experience various culture through traveling different countries by plane; thus expanding their outlook. Some people could get better job opportunities in other countries then obtain higher income; while some businessmen are possible to meet commercial chances to gain benefits by exporting or importing products. Some of them would lose these possibilities if the prices of flights were arise. Meanwhile, some people argue that the pricy service of flights will diminish the negative impact to the environment from ... High price will make some people abandon their plans of traveling by air to sort of destinations frequently; thereby reducing the flights, so as to reduce the greenhouse gas exhausted from planes. Other ... associated problems, including noise pollution, the environmental destruction from the construction and maintain of airports and other related infrastructures, will be improved. From my perspective, it is unnecessary to promote the flight prices because people deserve the chance of traveling and relaxing in different places. Citizens, especially who live and work in big cities, are extremely busy and full of pressure. If the flight is cheaper, they can take vacation in a relatively further spot. For example, Chinese tourists can visit some countries in Africa and enjoy the local food, rather than just relieve at home. In conclusion, my view is that decreasing the flight price is unreasonable. Through technological innovations, airport companies can reduce the strain on environment from flights.

Which is more important to teach at school, academic subjects or how to discriminate between R or W? Schools are normally considered as a place where students could be helped to acquire knowledge and improve the ability of employment. In my opinion, although academic courses is significant, could a student be hard to achieve success if he or she cannot distinguish things among right and wrong. Many techers believe that students have to pay more attention to main courses, since these subjects will determine if the students can get a further education in university. Through these courses, students will be able to acquire essential knowledge to construct a firm grounding for university, thus to find a decent job in the future. For example, if ones learn and master Mathematics well in high school, they will be likely to know how to design and build mathematical models to analyse data , thereby being employed as a financial analyst or an engineer. In contrast, students would not be able to focus on the main subjects if they spend too much time in learning virtual rules and action regulations. On the other hand, virtue is as important as academic subjects to be taught because with these guidlines students can apply their knowlege candidly and to be valuable members of our society. Those who know the importance of honesty would not sale the company's confidencial information to their competitors. An engineer who are socially responsible will design flawless products, which can be used by customers safely. It is less possible to achieve success for a man who cannot obey vital rules even he or she performed excellently at school. My personal perspective is that can students distinguish the right and the wrong, they will be able to pocess the characteristics to be sucessful in the future. Without these, they would not be possible to get along with their classmates and be respected by their teachers. If they could not realise these problems, their study and their work in the future would be inevitably impacted.