These words are used in a number of ways. So again I agree with Eliot. However, I'll add a little bit. b-b-b-eki is correct about would being the past tense of will. But it is more than that. eg: "She said she would do it" (past tense) "She would look fat in that dress" (IF she put that dress on. So it's based on a condition.) "Would you do the washing please" (Request) "I would love to go back to Thailand" (Desire) "I would go to University if I were you" (opinion) You really could look up "could" and if I were you I would......

Other examples of non-responsive might be: "The computer was non-responsive" it might have crashed or have no power etc. "The patient was non-responsive" eg if the patient was in a coma. "The controls for the nuclear reactor were non-responsive" :)

It will depend on how you are using it. eg: "I am used to better food than this." Or "I used to ride a bicycle." Another way to write these might be: "I would normally eat better food than this." And "In the past I rode a bicycle." In the first case it's a statement of a persons (or people) current situation based on the past. In the second it's a statement about the past and there are a great many ways to write it that are more informative. So a couple of quick examples might be: In the past Years ago When I was young Until (something) Before (something) "before the grass was green I...."

If I were very pedantic (and I am) I'd correct the second example to be: I don't have any money. So as Eliot alluded to, they are different ways of saying the same thing rather than an example of using the same words in a different order. If you were using the same words but changing the order then Eliot is correct. It matters.

Hello everyone.

I want to practice my English because I think i'm not good at it.

There are a vast number of ways to say this, eg:

I'd like to practice and become more proficient with the English language.