Could you correct my essay, please? Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? A teacher’s ability to relate well with students is more important than excellent knowledge of the subject being taught. Would you like to be taught by teacher, that has not good knowledge of the subject being taught? I think, the most people will answer “no”, because if someone want to study with a teacher’s help, he or she will hope, that professor have great knowing and experience on this discipline. So I do not agree with the statement above, that a teacher’s ability to relate well with students is more important than excellent knowledge of the subject being taught, for couple of reasons. Firstly, teachers’ job is to educate students with their knowledge. The ability to relate well with children is something that counselor should possess. That is why teachers with amazing knowing of the subject they teach can obtain an award. Professors who can get along with their students but have not knowledge are usually more popular and liked by children, but I suppose a teacher with no knowledge is a truly bad teacher. Secondly, students go to school to learn something new from their teacher, but not to relate well with others (it is, of course, important, but after all studying is more serious). I know an old Biology teacher, who is really clever and teach students well enough, but a lot of children complain that her lessons are boring and uninteresting, because she never entertains her students. However, she has a lot of knowledge and even have a few awards for teaching, which make learners to believe that her way of teaching is excellent. In conclusion, I guess the most important quality every teacher must have is brilliant knowing of the subject he or she teaches, but not the ability to relate well and get along with students.