Search from various English teachers...
Profile
Learning
Russian
Language Skills
EnglishNative
French
Spanish
Lesson Feedback
Lesson history
 Last monthLast 3 monthsAll time
Completed lessons00199
Attendance rate100%100%100%
Teacher reviews
Kevin Lozano
French
Aug 4, 2020
La leçon s'est très bien passée, à bientôt !
Activities
  • Commented
    Kvankam mi loĝas ĉe la okcidenta marbordo de Usono ĉiuj miaj amikoj venas de Kanado.

    0 voted
    May 17, 2020
    0
  • Corrected
    If the question is simply "How about you?" or "What about you?", then it is exactly the same. It is used to ask people what they are doing, their opinion, how they are feeling, etc. after you or someone else answered the same question.

    Example:
    Albert asks, "Brandon, are you traveling this summer?"
    Brandon replies, "I'm planning to go to Spain this summer. How/What about you, Charlie?"
    Charlie says, "I'm going to be working, so I can't travel."

    However, if "how about" and "what about" are the start of a longer sentence, they have slightly different meanings. "How about..." is used to make a suggestion.

    Example:
    Arthur says, "How about we watch a movie?"
    Bella replies, "Sure, great idea!"

    "What about..." can be used for suggestions that we are not sure about.

    Example:
    Antonio says, "My phone isn't working. Do you know how to fix it?"
    Beatrice suggests, "What about turning it off and on again?"
    (In this example, Beatrice is not sure that turning the phone off and on again will work, so she says "What about...")

    I hope this was clear. If you have any questions, don't hesitate to ask!
    0 voted
    May 17, 2020
    1
  • Answered
    Yes, this does sound good. There is only one issue unrelated to the main point of your question. Instead of "delegating amateurs to handle the event", I would say "delegating the handling of the event to amateurs". The reason I would do this is because we say "delegate (something) (to someone)".
    0 voted
    May 7, 2020
    0
  • Corrected
    0 voted
    May 7, 2020
    0
  • Corrected
    Wow! Un essai très bien écrit en deux langues. Malheureusement l'anglais est ma suele langue maternelle et vous parlez espagnol mieux que moi, donc je ne peux que vous aider avec cette partie. Vraiment, malgré certains erreurs votre écriture est au niveau d'un professeur d'université ou d'un scientifique. Bravo !

    What Is Creatatocracy? Is It The World Of Tomorrow? (2/2)

    What must be kept in mind is that the disruption of the current working world will give a pre-industrial face to the organization (<em>society</em> might be better, if that's what you mean) to some extent. What is a pre-industrial society? It is a society which relies on a base of craftsmen<em> </em>(craftsmen works, but I think <em>artisans</em> is more specifically what you mean based on the Spanish version of this paragraph) to realize the production of goods and commodities while taking a collective form in a punctual way (<em>quickly taking a collective form</em> sounds more natural) when it comes to waging war or carrying out major works such as the construction of roads or fortifications.

    Most of our value creation depends most often on organizations with which (<em>Most of our value derives from organizations in which</em><em> </em>is my recommendation) we occupy a specialist role whose security is maintained thanks to our compliance or even our conformism and especially to our ability to fully meet the requirements of the position. However, the changes we are witnessing make the scalability (By this, do you mean adaptability? If so, I would make the entire sentence <em>However, the changes we are witnessing make the adaptability of the employee essential.</em>) of the employee and therefore his ability to adapt essential. This requirement is well integrated by large groups (By <em>well integrated</em>, do you mean <em>valued</em>? I'm not sure what <em>well integrated</em> means. Also, which large groups are we talking about?) which are increasingly looking for candidates with such characteristics.

    However, the agility of an employee never replaces that of a self-employed worker who can suffer directly the unforgiving sometimes market laws. (I'm not sure what this sentence means. Could you perhaps reply to me clarifying your meaning so I can suggest an adjustment?) As you <s>already</s> know, our economic world changes according to processor calculations.
    The frontal competition (I'm not sure what this means) is done with the machine, so the reality will exceed fiction (I understand your meaning, but this is not idiomatic. Perhaps try <em>the reality will be worse than ever imagined</em>) for all those who do not take seriously the turn imposed by this new paradigm.
    Think of yourself as a creator because this will require you to make the effort to create which can then be replicated in all facets of your personal and professional life.
    A creative approach involves cultivating a fluid mind like flowing water like wood that can break. (How about<em> or flexible wood.</em>)

    Finally cultivate your compassion; according to Kai-Fu Lee, this value also makes you resilient in the face of this changing professional world. You will find below the impact of AI on employment which can be characterized in 4 different ways.
    The quadrant:
    (1): at the bottom left, jobs are doomed to disappear in the long term because humans do not bring any comparative advantage, either in terms of creativity or compassion. (Parlant un peu de la théorie économique: est-il possible que quelque chose n'a aucun avantage comparatif?)
    (2): top left: jobs will have to put AI at the center of their work, humans ensuring interaction with customers or the public
    (3): bottom right: humans and machines collaborate, one bringing creativity, the other the capacity for analysis
    (4): top right, the human remains the only master on board (This is not idiomatic, how about just <em>the master</em>), the AI being subordinate to him

    Below you will find a more concrete list of jobs that are threatened or not under the categories mentioned above.

    C'était un plaisir de lire votre essai! Superbement bonne travaille.
    0 voted
    May 7, 2020
    4
  • Answered
    You are correct; "adapt to" means "change to be suitable for". Viruses change a lot as they reproduce (have children). The Coronavirus did not make humans sick in the past, but now that the virus has adapted to humans, it can make us sick. In other words, the virus changed so that it could make people sick. Inform can mean "tell", but in this case it does not. Here, "how that information can inform drug and vaccine design" means "how that information can help with drug and vaccine design".
    0 voted
    May 7, 2020
    0
  • Answered
    It's important to note that 'little' is an adjective modifying 'results', not 'long-term'. As Mary Huag said, in this case little means 'few'.
    0 voted
    May 6, 2020
    0
  • Corrected
    0 voted
    May 6, 2020
    0
  • Corrected
    My Mom

    My Mom was called to me at morning.But i am was busy all time.I was can't call her back.Than i was ended my work.I am call her back when i going to home

    My Mom was calling <s>to</s> me in the morning, but I <s>am</s> was busy the whole time. I couldn't call her back. Then I finished my work. I will call her back when I get home.

    Or, if you want to call your mother back in the car <em>while</em> you are going home, you can say:
    I will call her back while I am going home.
    0 voted
    May 6, 2020
    0
  • Answered
    Native speaker of American English here. You could say "the amount of precipitation", although "rainfall" would be more common. Since the temperature was recorded in the past, you should say that the highest/lowest temperature "was recorded", rather than "is recorded". We also typically say "recorded to be X degrees" or "recorded at X degrees". Centigrade is also known as Celsius, and the former name is more commonly used in the UK while Celsius is the only term used in the USA. Still, educated Americans understand what centigrade means. I believe that Celsius is more formal than centigrade in the UK, but I would defer to a British English speaker. You should also say "30 degrees centigrade/Celsius", rather than just "30 centigrade/Celsius". I wouldn't say "however" in your second sentence. "However" implies contradiction, and it's perfectly normal for the high and low temperatures to be recorded in different months. Instead, I would say "...30 degrees centigrade, while the lowest temperature...". Similarly, "on the other hand" implies contradiction. I would leave out "On the other hand". Once again, the rain fell in the past, so you should not use the present tense "falls". I wouldn't use that verb at all, however. It would be more natural to say "The peak monthly precipitation was in February at 200mm, and the minimum was in August at 25mm. Saying that July and February had the highest precipitation and temperature implies that both months were hot and rainy. To say that July had the highest temperature, while February had the highest rainfall, use the word "respectively". I.e. "Overall, July and February had the highest temperature and rainfall, respectively, while December and August had the lowest, respectively." If you're unsure what "respectively" or any other word I used means, feel free to ask! Good luck in your English studies.
    0 voted
    December 25, 2019
    0