Young People Should Go to University or Find a Job. Some People Suggest that High School Graduate Students Should Go to Universities to Have Higher Education, But Others Encourage Students to Find Jobs to Meet the Needs of the Society. Discuss Both Views and Give Your Opinion. With the increasing fierce competition of job market, some individuals are of the opinion that students should look for work after they graduated from high school. Yet my view is students would be well advised to attend collage to further their studies. It is true that university education help young people to hone their cooperative skill. For instance, students can participate in group discussion and preparation of presentation. By doing this, young people can learn how to collaborate with other individuals and have better team sprite, which is one of the essential elements for success when they grow up. Also, in university, obviously, there are professional knowledge and skills offering for students gaining better job development. By this I mean, those which they acquire in collage can be used in practical work. As a result of it, when they graduated from university, there are greater opportunities for them than their peers who do not get high education. Further, university education can cultivate efficient learning habits, which are also important quality that is helpful for success. It enables people to learn the job skills quickly and so they can have a better work achievement. On the other hand, those who argue that high school graduate students ought to be encouraged to search for work instead of pursing higher education. However, lack of basic training in university is hard for them to carry out more complex work. It may, therefore, damage their confidence and hinder their long-term professional development. In conclusion, I think students should further their studies in university, as they can get more benefits for their future.

Successful sports professionals can earn a great deal more money The appearance of increasingly parents choose the profession of sports for their children--from basketball to skating to the tennis ball, has raised a question that whether the successful sports professionals should be highly paid, especially much more than other important professionals such as doctors and teachers. This discussion will attempt to provide an overview that it is of fairness for successful sports professionals to earn a great deal of money. A lot of news stories found on television, in the newspapers and on the Internet suggest that many people complain it is of unfairness for athletes to be highly paid. For instance, many other professionals such doctors, teachers and technologists work hard at their occupations are not so well paid in China. This point can also be illustrated with the example of a piece of news in the recent newpaper, which reported that several primary school teachers in a rural area of China had not been paid for two years. Although it seems that there are so many negative effects for the athletes to earn so much money compared with the other people especially the above primary school teachers, I still hold the prospective that the sports professionals are worth of being highly paid. First and foremost, only those who with talent may be successful in the sports field. In addition, it is such a hard way for the athletes, who even begin to receive strict training at a kindergarten age, to be successful especially to win a international medal. What`s more, when athletes get medals during the international competitions, the great honors not only belong to themselves but also to the country. At that time, they are the nation`s heroes and everyone is pround of them. I think, as a consequence, it is of fairness for the successful sports professionals to be highly paid. Nevertheless, the government also need to take measures to promote the paid for individuals who work hard in their unsubstituted professions.

change in Some Areas Obviously, the 21st century has been growing prosperity around the world and the rapid advances in science and technology, yet some people are of the opinion that the change may not happen in all the fields. In this essay, I will examine some areas which have been improved significantly and other areas which have not been. It is true that some fields such as technology, medical care, which have been changed a lot during past hundreds of years. Specifically, modern technology, the main driving force of our societies, results in higher productivity (e.g. advanced manufactured equipment), greater ease (e.g. state-of-the-art household appliances), more enjoyable game devices (e.g. PSP, Vii). Also, before the jet airliners were came in in the 1960s. For example, air travel was beyond the reach of most people. Furthermore, our knowledge of the world around us, especially foreign countries, was sketchy before the TV brought us the vivid imagines of documentaries. Clearly, modern technology has brought liberation from the boring work and set us free to enjoy the more interesting work and leisure. Besides, health care system has been changed apparently so more and more people can be entitled to free health care, and many even have the choice of their own doctors. The examples I have given is just a few of the many that I illustrate the case that many fields have been significantly changed. However, even though some areas have been improved, there are still other aspects that we need to make progress. Take environment as an example, due to the overgrazing and deforestation, some rain forests have been destroyed. Some factories discharge a host of toxic sewages, which have polluted the water and have threatened the public health. Another field which needs to improve is crime, the increasing crimes rates, which seriously interrupts the law-biding and peace-loving citizens. Thus, the government should fulfill its responsibility to make progress of these areas. To conclude, although human being has made some significant progresses, the government should also try to solve some severe problems such as pollution and crime.

Who should make decisions on the curriculum, the government or the teacher? One of the debatable issues over education is that who is responsible for the arrangement of curriculum. Some argue that teachers should decide on what to teach while others believe it is up to the government. On the one hand, government plays a very important role in the development of education, especially in a large developing country such as China. It is the government that decides the principles and formulates the general plans for the development of education, and it is also the responsibility of the government to decide what needs to be taught since the government has a thorough understanding of the requirement of the society. Without the support of the government, issues such as funding and the organization of the education system can not be guaranteed under the particular situations of China. It is not hard to conclude that the government is the founding father of the modern education system of China given the poor schooling basis of the Chinese society. On the other hand, as the education develops quickly in China, teachers are playing an more indispensable part in the teaching system. Thousands of experienced scholars and well-educated youngsters devoted to the teaching career. They have experience in the classroom and they know what students need to learn and how they can learn happily and effectively. So teachers have right to decide what to teach and how to teach to a certain degree because they are the ones involved in the fieldwork of teaching. Thus, for the further development of modern education and better arrangement of curriculum, teachers should be included in the deciding panel. I personally think that the two opinions over the decision making of the curriculum are not mutually exclusive. And actually they are both necessary for a successful education system. While the government responsible for creating a favorable macro environment for the schooling curriculum, teachers should have more power on decision of the curriculums for what to be taught and how to teach it in the classroom. In conclusion, the government and the teacher should cooperate to make more feasible and meaningful curriculums for the better education of the younger generation.

The Money Spending on Spece Exploration Can Be Used to Better Other Areas. With the advancement of space research at staggering rate, accompanied by spending numerous amount of money. Indeed, it has directly changed our world. Space probe are all well and good, nevertheless, in my view, not when they come at the expending of the present. Provided that this money can be sound applied in other area, like education, health and poverty alleviation, it will create better effect to mankind. It is believed that space exploration (e.g. NASA has launched satellites for weather and climate, humans have stepped onto the moon) has brought some benefits to humans. Truly, it renders human more chances to realize the space out of our planet, which has completed the dream of our ancestor. On the other hand, although billions of dollars were invested in this subject every year, the outcomes are limited. However, once this money can be well used to help human lives in other areas such as education, health and poverty alleviation, it will create more benefits to humans. As can be known, schools built in some remote countryside areas, which do not have sample education facilities, some of them even do not have safe class room. This, in turn, has a detrimental impact on students who acquire knowledge from schools. The main factor of this is due to lack of funding, if there is enough money being invested in here, which can be utilized to build some new schools and purchase useful books, all the students from these areas will profit from these. Similarly, this money can establish better healthcare system, as well as supporting the study of cancer. Therefore, people’ healthy level can be enhanced. Besides, some people, in particular, in Africa, suffering from terrible poverty. As we can seen from the press everyday, they do not have house to keep warm, even die of hunger. This situation can be accessible to improve, as long as acquiring sample financial grant. To conclude, we can not ignore the benefit which we gain from the space probe, but in my opinion, the authorities would be well advised to give priority to practical life, like education, health and poverty alleviation in our society.

About How Many People Use to Online The left bar chart illustrates the percentage in purchasing concert, cinema and theatre tickets online by selected age group during the first season of 2006 in three counties-Australia, the UK and Malaysia, while the right bar chart shows three usual methods of people how to access Internet. It is noticeable that more people in the 25-44 age group (approximately 55%) than people in over 65 year-olds (just under 50%) in Australia prefer to buy concert, cinema and theatre tickets on Internet. This pattern was similar to the UK, which had 55% of 25-40 age range who bought these tickets on line, comparing with approximately 40% over 65 year-olds. However, it showed a different pattern in Malaysia, less 25-44 age group (about 37%) than over 65 year-olds liked to buy ticket online, which more old individuals than young individuals chose to utilize the Internet to buy tickets. As can be seen from the right bar chart, the majority of people came from Australia, the UK and Malaysia chose to utilize desktop computer online. 40% of people came from Australia selected to laptop, in contrast, 30% of people from the UK and 41% of people from Malaysia). The minority of people(less than 30%) chose mobile . In conclusion, it is clearly seen from these pie charts that more young people than old people like to buy tickets of concert, cinema and theatre online, and the majority of people utilize desktop computer to access Internet.

Some People Belive That Competitive Sport(Team and Individual )Have No Place in the shcool Curricul At contemporary society, some individuals are the pinion of that school should not arrange Physical Education (PE) either team sports (e.g. football and basketball etc.) or individual sports (e.g. tennis and swimming). However, personally, I think this view is untenable. First of all, it is impossible to argue that physical activity promotes students’ health. Take for example, participation in sport, like tennis and badminton in PE, students will relief stress in terms of peer pressure and endless test and create a healthy basis for their later life. Further more, playing team sports can utilize to cultivate students’ team spirit and mould character. According to stiff competition in physical activity, a typical example of football, it teaches students how to cooperate better in one team and what to do in adverse circumstance. Final, national sport achievement begins in schools. Every years, nation picks up excellent athletes from sport. Without school support , national sports will collapse. Therefore, PE is absolutely an integral part of schooling. Yet other person, especially some parents put forward the view that students should not take part in physical activity in schools, because they feel that PE could, in school, wastes a great deal of money and resources that could be better spent on academic learning or sometimes generates some injuries. Nevertheless, actually, it is true that sports will help the student’ brain to function better, thus can enhance the efficiency of learning and better us in a over-round sense. On the other hand, if the sports event can organize well, injuries should be avoided. To conclude, school would be well advised to set up PE, at the same time, students ought to be encourage participating in physical activity, which can better our all-round sense, instead of merely an academic experience.