soigner : infinitif ou passé SVP dites-moi quelle phrase est correcte.. ' c'est où je vais pour me faire soigner' ou bien ' c'est où je vais pour me faire soigné ' merci d'avance

日本の方々　日本語　ちゃんと使ってほしいと思うですが　part 7 The association which administers the JLPT (Japanese Language Proficiency Test) 日本語能力試験 puts english words into the test every year, trying to force foreigners to accept their belief that these words are now japanese words. I asked some japanese friends and co-workers one of the questions that appeared in last december's test. The question asked to choose the most correct word for a certain sentence, from the following options 'sense, nuance, scale and conscious' all in katakana of course. Of the 5 japanese people I asked, only 2 chose the correct answer. The JLPT association is wrong and unprofessional to try to test our understanding of english words. Their job is to evaluate our understanding and proficiency of japanese. Inserting english words into the JLPT also unfairly disadvantages the non-english speaking foreigners who take the test, as they usually dont have as thorough an understanding of these english words as english speakers do. And they have the audacity to charge us 5000 yen to take the test. I and many others ,not only foreigners but free-thinking, aware Japanese people also, wish that all Japanese people (those who automatically imitate what they hear on tv or what others say,) and the mass media, would have more pride in their own unique and beautiful language, remember who they are, and just laugh at the pretenders, instead of copying them.

日本の方々　日本語　ちゃんと使ってほしいと思うですが　part 6 Sure it may have happened in other parts of the world in history, but always as a result of conquest/colonialism or necessity, not as a result of fashion, whim or image. Is a country's language free for any other country to take and absorb en masse into its own language? Are hundreds and hundreds of words from any one language ripe for the pillaging, as easy to take home as free plastic holiday souvenirs? I think definitely NOT. The japanese word-borrowers (an inaccurate word, as its unlikely any of these words will ever be 'given back') need to understand that language is a pre-eminent part of , if not inextricable from, culture. They are inseparable. Taking all these english words and stating that they are now japanese words is arrogant and culturally insensitive. Did they never think that it might be offensive to native english speakers to see long lists of english words hijacked, bootlegged and mispronounced? Would they just as nonchalantly call the didjeridoo a japanese instrument because they made one out of bamboo? or the sari a japanese garment because they tied an obi around it? They should try to imagine how they would feel if hiragana was taught and used as the 'new native script of South Sudan' or if tatami mats, kotatsu tables and futons were distributed in England as 'new Anglo Saxon furniture.' or if Sumo was held on the beach, and called ' New Hawiian sport'. It is an especially depressing trend for foreigners with a real interest in learning japanese and speaking it well. We learn new japanese vocabulary, enjoy the sound and image of it , look forward to hearing and understanding it, but we are denied this chance, and have to listen to so many english words. Our progress is blocked. English words, scattered through japanese speech, shatter the music and spoil the magic of japanese. It is frustrating and disappointing. Japanese sometimes doesn't feel like japanese anymore . It takes so much of the esthetic appeal and exotic allure out. We didn't fly half way around the world to be shortchanged like this, buy textbooks and enrol in language courses, study diligently, only to hear or be taught, for example, ' これは町のシンボルをアレーンジしたオーダーメードオリジナルラベルです。' (this is a custom made, original label, showing the town's symbol arranged on it). Or, 私はスピーチをする前にオーナーとアーティストのインスピレーションについてリーサーチをしました(before giving a speech, I did some research on the artist's inspiration, with the owner. ) Its very boring.