Monday

I was very busy today. I took my dogs to the park early in the morning and my husband made me pick him up at the office because his car was broken. When I got home I took a little rest. In the afternoon I had an interview with an important Mexican company. I think the interview was fine. I hope that I get the job.

Many of my corrections are the same as the previous editor's, but I also corrected your punctuation. What you had written was one very long sentence, and needed to be broken up into shorter sentences using periods instead of commas.

I had no trouble understanding your intent, though. Well done!

Yes, that is what an adrenaline junkie is. It is not impolite to refer to someone as an adrenaline junkie, but it is really only used when someone truly is that way. In my mind, it's not disrespectful, but I suppose it could be made to seem disparaging. However, if you just watched someone bungy-jump off a 300-foot high cliff, you would not be out of line to call that person an adrenaline junkie. It's not common except for people who are like that.

wow, Chris - that was pretty harsh. Just sayin'. If you don't want to help, don't respond, eh? I've found that sometimes I can read something, or have someone tell me something one way, and I just don't get it, but someone else may have a slightly different way of saying the right thing, and it's like a lightbulb, and I magically "get it". As for a response to this question - "in" generally means physically inside a place, and "at" can mean in the location of a place. If I said "John's at the store", I probably mean that he is not here (where we are right now), even though he is probably physically IN the store. But, if we are standing right outside the store and you ask where John is, I would tell you that he is IN the store. I don't think that "at" is more specific than "in", though. More likely the other way around. Clear as mud, isn't it? Sorry. English is a terrible language to have to learn, and I admire your efforts to do so. :-)