Search from various English teachers...
Profile
Learning
English
Language Skills
KoreanNative
Lesson Feedback
Lesson history
 Last monthLast 3 monthsAll time
Completed lessons000
Attendance rate100%100%100%
Teacher reviews
No record
Activities
  • Posted
    Could you correct my essay? Thanks! There are two opposite opinions on recycling about if requirement of recycling should be accompanied with legal regulation. Some people claimed strongly that government needs to intervene this issue and make legal restriction properly to increase recycling rate, but others argued that it is supposed to leave to individual’s conscience and responsibility of citizen, and not business of government, either. We all agree that recycling plays significant role to preserve sustained green environment and is also beneficial for companies and customers in terms of economical reason, which is decrease of manufacturing cost by recycling. First of all, let’s take a look about how much recycling is needed for environmental preservation. There are three different ways to deal with dump and trash we throw away every single days. We can burn with fire, bury under ground, or ocean. Burning them generates the gases which are detrimental to respiratory organs such as lungs and burring them under ground or ocean make a severe impact on animals and living creature which are living around. For example, turtles and gulls often recognize plastic material as their preys. Even it takes a few ten thousands of years to dissemble plastic under ground or ocean. Secondly, making products with recycled material can reduce the cost of manufacturing, which is advantageous for companies and household because companies can offer cheaper goods to customers. Therefore, because of a bounty of advantages of recycling, making it legal requirement is needed for public interests. For instance, government offers many kinds of subsidy, which is tax benefit, to residents whom they recycle more than average household, but gives punishment, environment charges, to them who didn’t obey the rule.
    May 3, 2018
    2
    0
  • Posted
    IELTS TASK1.... Could you give me a feedback and correct my wrong sentences? This line graph illustrates how much average carbon dioxide is emitted per person in the United Kingdom, Sweden, Italy and Portugal from 1967 to 2007. Overall, average carbon dioxide emissions of Italy and Portugal showed a significant rise over the period, while the emissions of CO2 molecule of Sweden and the United Kingdom experienced a downward trend. In 1967, CO2 emissions of Italy and Portugal were almost 4 and 1 respectively. The CO2 emissions of Italy rose steady, but significantly nearly to 7, exceeding Sweden’s CO2 emissions in the year 1987. Then, Italy remained stable for a decade since 1997. The CO2 emissions of Portugal increased sharply almost to 5, but remained plateau from 1997 to 2007, reaching same amount of the CO2 emissions with the CO2 emissions of Sweden in the end of the period. In early 1967, CO2 emissions of the United Kingdom was largest among these four countries. Even though it declined approximately to 9 till 2007, it stayed the one which is largest among them. The CO2 emissions of Sweden once rose dramatically from 1967 to 1977, but sharply dropped about to 5 in the end of the period.
    April 2, 2018
    1
    0
  • Corrected

    그냥 생각

    이 웹사이트로 쓰기연습을 이렇게 할 수 있는 것이 아주 좋지만 공개 노트가 될거니까 뭐에 대해 써야 할지 모르겠다. 일기를 쓰는 것 같이 여기에서 쓰기 시작하면 많은 개인적인 생각이나 정보가 밝혀질까봐 걱정이 된다. ㅋㅋ 그래도 매일 이렇게 조금씩만 써도 내 쓰기가 나아질 것 같다. 아마도 계속 하다 보면 쓸만한 아이디어가 나올거다. 이 웹사이트로 다시 한국어를 연습할 수 있어서 기분이 아주 좋다. 화요일에 나의 첫 온라인 말하기 수업에 참고할거니까 기대된다.
    0 voted
    March 26, 2018
    1
  • Posted
    IELTS WRITING, Could you correct my essay? Thanks! The given bar graph illustrates how often American people ate in fast food restaurants between 2003 to 2013. Generally speaking, almost of Americans had the experience to eat fast food, and half of them ate it at least once a week. On the other hand, only about 5% of them never have had it. According to the chart below, American people who ate it everyday is least among Americans who ate fast food, while those who ate it once a week are most in 2003 and in 2006, and those who ate it once or twice a month are reported most in 2013. In 2003 and 2006, the scale of vertical value, which is the ‘percentage of people’, increases from ‘everyday’ to ‘once a week’, but it decreases from ‘once a week’ to ‘never’. However, in 2013 it increases from ‘everyday’ to ‘once or twice a month’ and decreases from ‘once or twice a month’ to ‘never’. In conclusion, American people in 2013 ate less fast food than in 2003 or in 2006.
    March 26, 2018
    0
    0
  • Answered
    광안리 해수욕장, 감천 문화마을, 해동 용궁사 (감천 문화마을 is small village where you can find lots of cute houses and art works. 해동 용궁사 is really cool temple nearby ocean. 광안리 해수욕장 is famous beach in Busan.) Arrigatto!
    0 voted
    March 23, 2018
    0