Search from various English teachers...
Profile
Learning
Korean
Language Skills
GermanNative
EnglishNative
DutchNative
Lesson Feedback
Lesson history
 Last monthLast 3 monthsAll time
Completed lessons000
Attendance rate100%100%100%
Teacher reviews
No record
Activities
  • Posted
    How to say "I have a a peanut and walnut allergy, even with just the oil. If I eat it I could die." My friend and I will be travelling to Korea this summer. My friend however, has a severe walnut/peanut allergy and I want to put this phrase on a piece of paper so we can show it to people. I'm also aware that nut allergies aren't very common in Korea so they might not take it seriously. Peanut allergies are responsible for more than half of food allergy related deaths, which is common knowledge in Europe but not in Korea. So how do I say: "I have a a peanut and walnut allergy, even with just the oil. If I eat it I could die." You don't have to translate literally, just say it however way you think makes it very clear.
    January 29, 2018
    3
    0
  • Answered
    1, do you have any method to address this problem. = correct 2, do you have any way to address this problem. = correct 3, do you have any approaches to address this problem = I would say "any approach" But yes, they are interchangeable.
    0 voted
    December 8, 2017
    1
  • Answered
    Bullet shells Bullet casings These are correct :)
    0 voted
    December 8, 2017
    0
  • Answered
    No that's incorrect. I would say: If you arrange your holidays THROUGH a travel agency you'll be free from preparation tasks and won't have to worry about looking for the hotel with all THE facilities. Or more natural: "If you book through a travel agency, you won't have to prepare anything yourself such as finding a good hotel" Hope it helped :)
    0 voted
    December 8, 2017
    0
  • Answered
    I know but in this case the meaning is similar, so I just wanted to know if one would be preferred over the other. For example, if you ask someone "어디에 있어요 지금?" It can come of more demanding like "what exact location are you at" versus if you just ask "어디에요 지금?". But thanks for the input anyways
    0 voted
    December 5, 2017
    0
  • Posted
    How to ask a stranger "where is X" Say you want to ask someone where the subway or bathroom is, which is preferred?: X 어디에요? X 어디 있어요? Both are formal, the second one is more formal I think. So which one would you use for a complete stranger or a waiter etc?
    December 4, 2017
    6
    0
  • Answered
    It's just a very old word that is now only used in "begane grond". Literally means the floor where people usually are.
    0 voted
    December 4, 2017
    0
  • Answered
    It's the same. There is no difference at all. Usually, "U" is seen as 3rd person. Which means: u heeft (because it's also hij/zij heeft) Or it can be seen as 2nd person. Which means: u hebt (because jij hebt) In spoken language, "u heeft" or "heeft u" is much more common and also what I usually say. When I write a formal letter, I use "u hebt" or "hebt u". In modern Dutch novels, "u heeft" is also more common. In short: both correct, "u heeft" is used more colloquially, "u hebt" is better for formal letters.
    0 voted
    December 4, 2017
    1