Personally, I think that life is better in a city. First of all, there are a lot of entertainments like cinemas, theatres, amusement parks. Additionally, urban life provides young people with a great opportunity to get a good education which later means finding a well-paid job. Finally, architecture in a megapolis is more graceful than in the country. Its nobility inspires one to self-development.

However, some people have a different point of view. They say that food is poisonous in big cities which severely ruins one's health and leads to obesity. In their opinion, urban life is usually routine. Living at a high pace leads to constant stresses.

However, I argue contrary to that belief. Urban life provides people with a lot of opportunities and choices. If he or she wants to keep fit and stay healthy they can attend a gym and buy organic products.

To conclude, I can say that the city life provides people with facilities which the country life doesn't. Big city life is easier because all the necessary products are at one's hand.

Personally, I think that everybody should learn all of the school discipline to be enough educated and smart. First of all, people use computers every day, so it is vital to learn Information Technology to acquire knowledge of operating personal computers. Additionally, everyone should know Anatomy, the part of Biology, so as to maintain and enhance health of their own bodies. Moreover, the more subjects students learn, the more thrilled interlocutors they become.

However, some people fail to recognize the benefits of compulsory subjects at school. In their opinion, students who strive to accomplish every discipline usually do not come off as learning process requires constant concentration and takes a lot of time. In contrast, those who devote more time primarily to a couple of useful subjects succeed more often. Opponents also consider that brains cannot remember everything, as they store information that seems captivating to a person.

There is a lot of truth in what they say. My personal opinion is that all-round development is in demand on the labor market.

All in all, I still strongly believe, that students should study every subject at school to broaden their horizons. The whole school program gives young people the knowledge of how the world operates.

Personally, I think that talent is the is the backbone of success. First of all, gifted people more often get a well-paid job. They are in demand at the labour market. Additionally, clever students can easily enter university and get an education which can be paid from the State budget. What is more, actors, singers, writers cannot become famous without being gifted.Creative professions always require talent.

However, some people fail to recognize the benefits of being talented. In their opinion, a lot of clever people cannot provide decent living conditions due to their laziness and procrastination. They also consider that one can acquire talent by practising hard and putting more effort into achieving a goal.

There is a great deal of truth in what they say. My personal view is that smart people can spend a shorter amount of time getting the better results unlike those who follow the rules of discipline and work all the time.

All in all, I still strongly believe that talent has the edge over discipline. Intelligent people can develop their skills and enhance their abilities while talentless ones stay at the same level of knowledge regardless their attempts to succeed.

Personally, I think that technical progress mostly harms Earth. First of all, cars have resulted in global warming. The greenhouse effect is warming the planet and threatening the environment. Additionally, factories has caused air pollution. Moreover, technical progress has provided people with comfortable living conditions, so it caused overpopulation which is disastrous for Earth. Greater populations have polluted and consumed more, ruining the environment and intensifying a variety of problems.

However, some fail to recognize the harm of technical progress. In their opinion, it is much more beneficial than dangerous. For example, solar panels are very popular in 21 century. They, unlike thermal power stations, can generate energy without toxic release.

There is a great deal of true in what they say. Unfortunately, producers often save on using cheap equipment, which badly harms nature.

All in all, environmental problems are becoming more and more pressing. I still strongly believe that technical progress is dangerous not only for flaura and faina, but also for all human beings. As a result of technical achievements, the planet ability to support people is being endangered.

Birds often feed ___ the rubbish left by people.

What should i put here?