Search from various English teachers...
Profile
Learning
German
Chinese (Mandarin)
Language Skills
CatalanNative
SpanishNative
English
French
Lesson Feedback
Lesson history
 Last monthLast 3 monthsAll time
Completed lessons0033
Attendance rate100%100%100%
Teacher reviews
No record
Activities
  • Corrected
    Estudies o treballes?

    -¿Què fas, estudies o treballes?
    -Els matins estudio informàtic (informàtica) i a les tardes faig de professora de matemàtiques.

    -Estudies o treballes?
    -Treballo.
    -De què fas? (No sembla impensable, però probablement seria millor dir "Què fas?" o "De què treballes?")
    -Faig de caixera.

    -Què estudies?
    -Disseny gràfic. I tu?
    -Illustració. (amb l geminada, il.lustració; també podries dir dibuix)

    -Què vols estudiar?
    -Big Data i Analítica de negoci. I tu? (sincerament no sé què és l'analítica de negoci, mes probablement s'hauria d'utilitzar anàlisi (f.), puix que analítica s'empra més que res en el camp médic)
    -Dietètica i Nutrició.

    -Presenta’t si us plau.
    -Em dic Isolda, tinc vint-i-vuit anys i soc advodada. (en els meus temps d'estudiant sóc encara portava accent, però ara és malauradament opcional)

    Espero que li serveixi. Bon dia o bona tarda.
    0 voted
    April 24, 2020
    1
  • Answered
    No. You could say "By whom were you made sad?", as you need to introduce the agent with by, but it does not sound natural at all. "Who made you sad", on the other hand, does sound quite natural and is grammatically correct. Hope it helps!
    0 voted
    April 23, 2020
    0
  • Answered
    Possible = not impossible, something that can happen. Plausible = reasonable, believable, something that (it is thought) will likely happen; feasible, achievable. Everything that is deemed plausible is also assumed to be possible (even if that is not necessarily the case), but of course that which is possible may not seem plausible. Plausible stuff requires someone believing in it and implies a higher probability, whilst possible stuff is rather objective and usually implies a certain remoteness. Furthermore, possible also may mean achievable (used in contexts where considering plausibility seems irrelevant). i. Hers is a plausible (believable) alibi. ii. Yes, sure, a few people have visited the moon, so it's possible that you have been there. But do you really expect me to believe it? iii. Do you think it's still possible for me to (that I still can) get into Harvard?
    0 voted
    April 13, 2020
    0
  • Corrected
    0 voted
    April 13, 2020
    0
  • Answered
    My version: According to recent surveys, vegetarianism has gradually become an alternative to meat doctrine. Perhaps those who have lately embraced vegetarianism were persuaded by the following saying of Master Buddha: "All ancient creatures were herbivores; after all, plants precede animals chronologically." A more faithful version: According to a recent survey, vegetarianism has gradually become a trend alternative to meat doctrine. This is not surprising, for as once Buddha said: "All ancient creatures were herbivores. After all, animals originated later than plants." Corrections: statistic survey - > recent survey (Most surveys are statistical, so it seems redundant) has gradually become a trend of an alternative -> has gradually become an alternative to (has gradually become suffices, you needn't trend. If you really wish to keep trend, you ought to erase that "of an", for alternative already acts as an adjective to trend) In addition to a saying of the Master Buddha, -> Perhaps those who have lately embraced vegetarianism were persuaded by the following saying of Master Buddha (As I was not sure about what you wanted to express I made some major changes, more fitting to the topic discussed... It appears that you want to express the cause of the trend, therefore, you should use a causal connector or construction instead of a copulative one (which serve to extend a point or give an example) "all ancient creatures were herbivores. After all, animal produced is the latter than plants." -> "All ancient creatures were herbivores; after all, plants precede animals chronologically." (The ; just seems more appropiate, as both clauses are semantically related. The second clause was quite strange so I remade it so as to render it more suitable to the topic; nevertheless, provided you change produced for originated, add an s to animals (for pl), change latter for later, and erase that the you should get a correct--albeit stoic--sentence) I hope it helps!
    0 voted
    July 22, 2017
    2