| Last month | Last 3 months | All time | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Completed lessons | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Attendance rate | 100% | 100% | 100% |
- I started with learning vocabulary and went through a 700 word list based on JLPT N5. It included both kana and kanji cards. I wasn't too interested in reading at the time (was more interested in listening), so this suited me. Then I decided I needed to read Japanese to learn and thus Kanji became necessary. I having a lot of luck with a method based on breaking the Kanji into pieces and then remembering each character as sort of a combination of its pieces. This is based on the method used in the Remembering the Kanji books, although I'm not using those books. Before I did this, the words that I "knew" the Kanji for, I basically only recognized vague shapes like lots of lines, especially horizontal lines with a box. After using this method, a Kanji becomes something like bird 鳥 + mountain 山 = island 島. This is much easier to learn than a collection of random lines. For instance, I think of it as birds rest on islands which are really just mountains partially under the sea. I've been trying to use the actual meanings for the parts, but it almost doesn't matter. What really matters is that you can recognize sub-pieces and reuse them. I'm trying to learn them in frequency order except learning parts before wholes. A lot of Kanji are used as part of another Kanji. I just started 7 days ago and I've gone through about 500 Kanji so far. I'll still need to review them a bunch of times before I really know them, but it has been much easier than I expected. I'm only trying to learn to recognize the Kanji and remember the meaning. It is probably much more difficult if you want to be able to right them as well, but I only plan to type them using hiragana input. If you want to follow this approach, check out the site koohii. The Kanji seem very closely related to the vocabulary meanings and pronunciations. I'm actually expecting learning the Kanji to speed up overall learning.0 votedJuly 5, 20170
The ! is used to show emphatic or genuinely enthusiastic content, not just surprise. "Good day!" would be an genuinely enthusiastic and usually happy greeting.
As far as "?!", it isn't correct English. You'll occasionally see various combinations of "?" and "!" at the end of sentences. They are all incorrect English I think, but you will see them from time to time, particularly in more information written contexts (like text messages). More "!" is more emphatic, but it is pretty pointless past 3. I've mostly seen either "!" or "!!!" with "!!" being less common. You'll also see "!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!" occasionally but it is pointless and many people find it obnoxious. I have used "!?!" at the end of sentences to express extreme surprise / disbelief. For example, "You did WHAT!?! Oooo, you are going to be in so much trouble. Your father is going to kill you!". It is basically attempts to translate some of the nuances available in speech into text form.
0 votedJuly 4, 20170I agree with Thomas but have a little more information for you.
"Them that don't listen, have to be brought to heel someday"
"brought to heel" means forced to heel. Heel mean to follow / obey. You mostly hear "heel" used when training dogs. When you train a dog to heel, you a training it to walk directly by your side and keep whatever pace you set even if you vary your pace. So "brought to heel" means more like "forced to obey" but it is understood that the force will be unpleasant and probably very painful.
0 votedJuly 4, 20170- "Danger!" is a warning you might be injured if you disobey. "Keep off!" says don't go on something. Here "on" would mean it is supporting your weight. "Keep off!" would usually mean don't walk on a surface, don't sit on something, or don't climb on something. "Keep out!" says don't go in this area. For area with a floor that you aren't supposed to go onto, you might potentially see either. "Keep off!" would be suggesting that you aren't allowed because of the floor / surface. For example, an unstable bridge might have a "Danger! Keep off!" sign. "Keep out!" is suggesting that you aren't allowed because of the area. For example, a military base might have a "Danger! Keep out!" sign.0 votedJuly 4, 20171
- It is poor English, so it requires some interpretation. I think they were going for: "Corporate drones are quick to engage their damage containment routine." As Natalia said, a corporate drone is a mindless robot for the corporation. This continues the analogy by saying that they apply their programming ("routine" = program). "Engage" makes it sound more mechanical and basically means "start" or "apply" here. "to do" just sounds like the wrong verb to me. "damage containment" might be a somewhat poor attempt to again make it sound more robotic / mechanical by using slighting the wrong word but keeping the right overall meaning. As Doctor Rod said, "damage control" would be the normal phrase.0 votedJuly 3, 20171
- "It is just to gild the lily to ask about that." is very unnatural to the point that I don't know what it would mean. "You are gilding the lily to ask about that." makes more sense, although I don't see how you can "guild the lily" by asking a question. "gild the lily" literally means "coating the lily in gold" but figuratively it means pointlessly overdoing something that is already near perfection. The thought behind the phrase is the lily is already beautiful so there is no reason to try to make it beautiful by coating it in gold. "gild the lily" is usually used as a phrase with context usually understood from surrounding sentences. Examples: "Let's not gild the lily." "Putting chrome on that car is gilding the lily." "It's done already. Stop gilding the lily." It usually comes at the end of the sentence, but it can be used elsewhere. "You are gilding the lily by adding another light there."0 votedJuly 3, 20170
- Indeed, it is occasionally used. It isn't a commonly used word so it tends to be used more in formal contexts. It isn't just strictly used for emphasize and it sounds more natural in some contexts than others. Your example sentence 1 and 4 are more likely to be heard than example sentences 2 and 3. It roughly means "It is definitely true that".0 votedJuly 3, 20171
