两门撒谎技术从美国政客: 第二

There   maybe  all  of  accurate
The second technique: the practiced liar does not believe in the public good, maybe cannot even conceive of the public good. I think the practiced liar views society as a completely amoral marketplace and nothing else. In this way, the liar sees social intercourse not as an exchange of facts, but as an exchange of valueless words. So sometimes the liar buys trust with honesty, and later the liar sells lies using the currency of that trust. Possibly the liar's exchange is even in balance, in equal parts. One either likes someone or dislikes them. But with this kind of liar, how can one decide? It's not clear. First, one has to recognize the liar's true nature, and after one must see that even if the lies and truths are in balance, the liar still harms people.