Corrections · 5
两门撒谎技术从美国政客(美国政客的两门撒谎技巧): 第二
第二技术(技巧):熟练说谎者不信公益,可以不可能构想公益(善于说谎的人不相信公共利益,甚至不可能去考虑公共利益)。我认为熟练说谎着视社会为只没有德行市场。(我认为善于说谎的人把社会不当作别的,而是当作一个完全不道德的市场)
如此视交际不为交流事实但是为交流没有价值的词。(这样,说谎者不把社会交流看作一种事实的交流,而是作为一种无价值的语言交换。)
所以有的时候说谎者用诚实话买(用实话换取)大众的信赖,后面(然后)说谎者用那个信赖的货币卖撒谎到大众。(说谎者用那个信赖货币卖谎话给大众)
可以这个交流甚至做地平衡。(可能说谎者的交换是平衡的,平等的。)
喜欢人或者不喜欢人。(一个人喜欢一个人或不喜欢一个人)
但是对这种说谎者来说,怎么决定? 不明白。good job!
先得认识说谎者本来面目or 真实本性,
以后看到连撒谎话和诚实话平衡,也说谎者害人。(即使以后看到谎话和实话达到平衡,说谎者仍然伤害了人们。)
You did a good job!
If you have any questions, feel free to talk. :)
The second technique: the practiced liar does not believe in the public good, maybe cannot even conceive of the public good. I think the practiced liar views society as a completely amoral marketplace and nothing else. In this way, the liar sees social intercourse not as an exchange of facts, but as an exchange of valueless words. So sometimes the liar buys trust with honesty, and later the liar sells lies using the currency of that trust. Possibly the liar's exchange is even in balance, in equal parts. One either likes someone or dislikes them. But with this kind of liar, how can one decide? It's not clear. First, one has to recognize the liar's true nature, and after one must see that even if the lies and truths are in balance, the liar still harms people.
两门撒谎技术从美国政客: 第二
第二技术:一个熟练的说谎者不相信公益,更不可能构想一个公益。我认为一个说谎的老手视社会为完全不道德市场,而没有其他的东西。 这样看来,说谎者不把社交作为一种交往的事实,而仅仅认为它是一种无价值的文字交换。所以,有的时候说谎者用信任买来诚实,然后再用谎言产生的货币来获取信任。可能说谎者在一些相等的部分,也是处于一种交换的平衡状态 。一个人要么喜欢他们要么不喜欢。但是这类说谎者,怎么来决定? 这是不能明确的。 首先,得认清说谎者的真实面目,然后,人们要认识到,即使谎话和真实好似是平衡的,但是它仍然伤害了人们。其中可能有不准确的地方
There maybe all of accurate
The second technique: the practiced liar does not believe in the public good, maybe cannot even conceive of the public good. I think the practiced liar views society as a completely amoral marketplace and nothing else. In this way, the liar sees social intercourse not as an exchange of facts, but as an exchange of valueless words. So sometimes the liar buys trust with honesty, and later the liar sells lies using the currency of that trust. Possibly the liar's exchange is even in balance, in equal parts. One either likes someone or dislikes them. But with this kind of liar, how can one decide? It's not clear. First, one has to recognize the liar's true nature, and after one must see that even if the lies and truths are in balance, the liar still harms people.
Want to progress faster?
Join this learning community and try out free exercises!
Don’t miss out on the opportunity to learn a language from the comfort of your own home. Browse our selection of experienced language tutors and enroll in your first lesson now!
Start Learning Today
