Profile
Learning
English
Language Skills
Chinese (Mandarin)Native
Lesson Feedback
Lesson history
| Last month | Last 3 months | All time | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Completed lessons | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Attendance rate | 100% | 100% | 100% |
Teacher reviews
No record
Activities
- Job Change (People have different job expectations for jobs. Some people prefer to do the same job for the same company, while others prefer to change jobs frequently. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.) Today, many workers change their jobs very often. Some believe that this way will bring more opportunities for them, while others think that staying in the same company is a better alternative. Staying in the same job meas job security that result in steady income. This will without doubt bring people inner security. It can also give you more practical experience and improve the efficiency. Also, your loyalty to the company will gain the boss’s trust, which are likely to lead to your career promotion and the salary increase. However, in this way, you may fall into routine and feel bored and unmotivated at some degree, or ever cause severe mental illness. On the other hand, job changes can help you master more different career skills, as you are evidently up against distinct situations while in distinct positions. This will also tougher you resilience that can be learnt no other way. Another benefit of job change is that you can meet new people of any types. In other words, creating a wider social net will be a truly reality for you. And yet, you are probably be seen as unreliable. For which, employers may not want to hire and invest money in training you. In conclusion, it is apparent that both advantages and disadvantages exist whether you alter your job or not. In my point of view, it might seems to be a wiser choice to change your job only a few times for practical experience while in the identical spot most of the time.March 19, 201710
- leaders should be young or old? (The leaders or directors of organizations are often older people. But some people think that young people can also be leaders. To that extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion?) It seems that from ancient times to the present, of the phenomenon that seniors are usually be the chiefs or commander of administration is common. I partly agree with this idea. Time gives seniors more practical experience accumulation and wisdom that can be learnt no other way. They are acquainted with devastating and urgent situations and events, helping to deal with them more appropriately, which is thought to be at the core of leadership and organizing. Normally, old people are high in seniority so that they are capable of taking responsibility for everything and every numbers. As a result they are considered to be reliable and trustworthy, and giving others mental security. On the other hand, youth is treasure, after all, Youngsters are way more energetic, active and creative that seniors, for they can work extra hours, always hold the passion and are more likely to come up with innovative initiatives, which increase working efficiency a lot. Being leaders is also a fast and effective way to help them learn, improve and thoughen themselves, because they have to plan ahead and be in charge of everything. And not often but there really is some young people with outstanding abilities can work even better than seniors. They shouldn’t be stifled. In conclusion, to a great extent, it is truly reasonable to let the old organize and command. Yet they should also discover and cultivate youngsters of excellent abilities by allowing them to be members of the leading group.March 19, 201700
- dangerous sports (Some people think that dangerous sports should be banned,while others think that people should have the freedom to choose the sports activities that they want to do. Discuss both these views and give your opinion.) Today, extreme sports have gained phenomenal popularity among people from all over the world, especially youngsters, which spark a wide controversy whether it should be banned or not. Personal safety is one of the most important reasons why some people advocate to restrict dangerous sports. It is quite true that a part of extreme sports, such as bungee jumping, can raise your potential rate to have heart disease, high blood pressure or something. Therefore, governments may be thought to be responsible for their people’s healthcare by declaring the ban on it. Also, extreme sports are widely considered as a waste of money, for the sports lovers have to buy some necessary and reliable outfits and equipment which are of pretty high price. People can even be in debt if they are totally addicted to them. It is definitely probable since the sports fans are mainly the young, most of which do not have abundant funds. On the other hand, extreme sports are likely to be useful and practical for people who are dedicated to join the army and be special soldiers. Because they are great challenges to toughen people’s brave, courage, flexibility, strength and adjustment, which are valuable characters for a qualified soldier. Another advantage is that it is great fun. People can completely release themselves and immerse themselves in the sense stimuli in order to make them feel alive and hectic again, particularly for people who are under great pressure or find their job tedious and dull. This may be an effective way to help them adapt to this fast- paced society. In conclusion, it is apparent that both advantages and disadvantages exist whether the extreme sports are banned or not. In my point of views, it should be individuals’ very freedom to choose their sports way, yet governments offer relational guidance on these issues at the same time.March 12, 201710
00:00
00:00