Maybe your English is better than me, but below is a humble correction for your review.
The book I am currently reading is a giant book, compound of almost 1500 pages and 61 papers, each from a different author. All of them are directly or indirectly related to the Public Ministry. This is a book, I luckily received as a giveaway from my teacher during a lecture (I don't know is called a "draw": the teacher randomly chose a student to give the book to).
Today I finished reading chapter 13, which approached the relationship between law and neurobiology regarding the perks and need of self-contained conflict resolution methods. It was interesting, but kind of trivial. I plan to read about this topic from other sources later.
After that, I went to chapter 1, the one on which, I spent most of my time today, because it was somewhat hard to understand. It was basically describing neo-constitutionalism. The difficulty lied in the fact that the reader should have previous knowledge on Natural-Law and Legal posivitism, and my background is deficient in both.
Then I read chapter 26, which argues the fundamental right status of the Public Ministry. This one was very interesting, it is going to be very helpful for the paper I'm going to write in the following months.
Lastly, I started reading chapter 40, that is relative to homeless people rights. I haven't finished it yet, because I've already done my four-hour study shift of today. I'll continue it by tomorrow.