Hi Mikhail, Without any context from the rest of the conversation, I cannot say for sure. Usually this is a type of rhetorical question, one that is not meant to be answered aloud. It is sometimes a response to an obvious statement. You can imagine something saying something like: Person 1: "I don't think he will be a distraction for the class." Person 2: "Of course not, why would he be?" (it's obvious he will not distract anyone) Person 1: "It's probably not going to snow during the summer." Persona 2: "Obviously not. Why would it?" *By itself, the phrase "Would I/you/she be ___ (a doctor, outside, happy, etc.)?" is a verb construction we use in English to ask a hypothetical question, a situation has not happened yet but could happen. Hope this helps. Good luck.

First, usage notes: 1. Fledgling refers to a beginner in an activity, but it also has connotations of youthful inexperience. It is a great word, but it is not used very often for adults. "Beginner" or "novice" is more common when talking about language learning. 2. To elucidate is a high register (advanced, more formal or technical) word that is the equivalent of "to explain" or "to make clear" in neutral/informal speaking and writing. Elucidation is also high register and is the equivalent of ]"clarification" or "explanation". 3. At your convenience is a common phrase that shows politeness and willingness to get along. It is useful both for informal and formal situations, like business or education. It is similar to "when you get a chance", which is more informal. In short, elucidate, elucidation, and at your convenience are good to use. You can call yourself a fledgling but I wouldn't use the word to describe another person. Sentence corrections: "At that time, I was a fledgling/beginner/novice at English, but now I speak English perfectly." *"My/the economics teacher was inexperienced in her subject, so I left her class." "I don't understand; could you elucidate/explain/clarify/make it clearer?" "I don't need any elucidation/explanation/clarification from you about what happened on that day." "You can text me back at your convenience. No problem!" "You can come to my house at your convenience." or "You can come over anytime you want." *Fledgling here would be considered an insult.

I would say;: "I'm leaving the university in twenty minutes" or "I'm about to leave the university"; however, "I'm about to leave in twenty minutes" is understandable too.

"I'm afraid not to believe it" is a quite specialized sentence that implies a previous conversation. I don't know the context, but what I would guess is that there is something serious, dangerous, and/or life-threatening that the first question's it in "Do you believe it?" is referring to. For example, there could be a rumor that a serial killer is loose in the neighborhood or that a new law is coming which will take away some freedom. In those cases I could hear someone saying "I'm afraid not to believe it." To rephrase it, it means "While it may be inconvenient to believe something like that, it's worse to not believe it and have it happen anyway [while I am unprepared.] So yes, I suppose I do believe it." I hope this helps.

Thank you Maryan! Thatt clears up so much. The акцентска целост seems like the stresses of, for example, нЕ знам and напрАви го. Is it the same phenomenon? I'm not sure about the formatting. Did pressing enter not work?

Introducing myself

Hello friends, I am Arturo. 

I am learning English because I would like to get a better job and I would like to make friends from USA.

My native language is Spanish. I was born in Mexico City AND I have lived in the City all my life.

I enjoy politics, music and culture.

 

 

Well, nothing in your journal is actually wrong, just that you could maybe change the punctuation which I did. Fantastic job Arturo. Good luck on learning English!