Should countries be isolated or engage other countries? It may seem strange in the 21 century but the question of whether the countries should be open to the world or isolated is still actual. It is crucial to consider this question because in our globalised world the matter of piece, development and wellfare of humankind depends on it. I personally believe, that countries should not be isolated. I think so, first of all, because progress can be achieved only through cooperation. Our current civilization is the result of the cultural, idealogical and technological interexchange between the nations and countries. So a country cannot evolve and develop without using the global achievements in different areas of human life. For instance, even the most isolated theocratic countries rely on modern technological and military achievements to control and regulate their states. Thus, no country can stay isolated forever if it wishes to be able to compete with the other countries. Additionally the nature of modern economy makes it impossible for countries to remain completely isolated. The truth is, that one particular country cannot produce all the products required to keep the economy running. It has to export the surplus of its domestic products to other countries and import from them the products it needs. Maintaining these kind of operations means engagement in global trade. Moreover, the technological pogress made it impossible for countries to maintain the complete isolation. Nowadays the Internet and mobile devices give all the men opportunities to communicate with each other even from the very long distances. These technologies have actually erased borders between the citizens of every country, enabling them to exchange information despite all the govermental censorship. To sum it all up I think that countries should not choose isolation over engagement to other countries. I think so because my arguments prove that in this century maintaining isolation is impossible.

Decisions should be made according to man's own values I do not agree that it is important to find out if the decision would be popular with others, before making it. I think so because making decisions is first of all the matter of personal choices and one cannot rely too much on other peoples opinion on making his personal decisions. First of all, I believe that one should make a decision considering his own demands. I think so because as the proverb says one can't make an omelette without breaking some eggs. The same way, every decision that a person makes is going to have effects on the others, but not all of them would be positive. So if you ask other people's opinions about your decisions, you would find some who do not like them, because your decisions are going to have negative effects on them. Nevertheless, the person himself is the first one who will suffer from the consequences of his own decisions. That is why I think that while making a decision one should not ask for other people's opinion, because they usually think about their own benefits, not his. Additionally, there are as many opinions as there are people. So every person has different opinion on the subject and their opinions usually contradict each other. That is why it is better to rely on your own point of view, rather than asking others. Moreover, there is a saying that one cannot change the world doing what other people tell him to do. Majority of the greatest decisions in the world history were made against the conventional wisdom. History proves that sometimes popular opinions are not always true. That is why if a man wants to make changes he should make his own decisions based on his own values. For all the listed reasons, I do not agree that people should make decisions according to their popularity among others. On the contrary, decisions should be made according to one's own values and demands.

Should students be encouraged to question everything? It's one of the most important questions whether teachers should encourage their students to question everything. This issue is important because it can affect both their learning quality and their personal characteristics. I believe that it's better if students are encouraged to question every theory they are presented with, because it'll help them to develop critical thinking and to learn more about the given subject. First of all, I believe that encouraging students to question everything is better because it forces them to learn more. Questioning the offered material requires making researches on the subject, which demands reading and searching for additional materials. So letting students to question the given material encourages them to learn more. It also helps them to develop some skills that could help them in their future researches and projects. Additionally, I think that encouraging students to question the material is better because it helps to develop the skill of critical thinking. Students who learn to question the subjects of their study would eventually learn to consider every statement and every theory from all the different points of view. They would not accept any argument or any thesis without properly overthinking it and checking the facts that support that argument. This skill could be very helpful in their future adult life. For instance the students with critical thinking would be less prejudiced. Also they would fight against the wrong conventional opinions and dogmas. In general, students would learn to think independently. That reasons too, make me think that students should be taught to question everything. In conclusion, I believe that it's better if teachers encourage their students to question everything. I think so because all the above-mentioned arguments demonstrate that questioning everything is helpful for both students' learning process and for their future adult lives.