Should countries be isolated or engage other countries? It may seem strange in the 21 century but the question of whether the countries should be open to the world or isolated is still actual. It is crucial to consider this question because in our globalised world the matter of piece, development and wellfare of humankind depends on it. I personally believe, that countries should not be isolated. I think so, first of all, because progress can be achieved only through cooperation. Our current civilization is the result of the cultural, idealogical and technological interexchange between the nations and countries. So a country cannot evolve and develop without using the global achievements in different areas of human life. For instance, even the most isolated theocratic countries rely on modern technological and military achievements to control and regulate their states. Thus, no country can stay isolated forever if it wishes to be able to compete with the other countries. Additionally the nature of modern economy makes it impossible for countries to remain completely isolated. The truth is, that one particular country cannot produce all the products required to keep the economy running. It has to export the surplus of its domestic products to other countries and import from them the products it needs. Maintaining these kind of operations means engagement in global trade. Moreover, the technological pogress made it impossible for countries to maintain the complete isolation. Nowadays the Internet and mobile devices give all the men opportunities to communicate with each other even from the very long distances. These technologies have actually erased borders between the citizens of every country, enabling them to exchange information despite all the govermental censorship. To sum it all up I think that countries should not choose isolation over engagement to other countries. I think so because my arguments prove that in this century maintaining isolation is impossible.

Decisions should be made according to man's own values I do not agree that it is important to find out if the decision would be popular with others, before making it. I think so because making decisions is first of all the matter of personal choices and one cannot rely too much on other peoples opinion on making his personal decisions. First of all, I believe that one should make a decision considering his own demands. I think so because as the proverb says one can't make an omelette without breaking some eggs. The same way, every decision that a person makes is going to have effects on the others, but not all of them would be positive. So if you ask other people's opinions about your decisions, you would find some who do not like them, because your decisions are going to have negative effects on them. Nevertheless, the person himself is the first one who will suffer from the consequences of his own decisions. That is why I think that while making a decision one should not ask for other people's opinion, because they usually think about their own benefits, not his. Additionally, there are as many opinions as there are people. So every person has different opinion on the subject and their opinions usually contradict each other. That is why it is better to rely on your own point of view, rather than asking others. Moreover, there is a saying that one cannot change the world doing what other people tell him to do. Majority of the greatest decisions in the world history were made against the conventional wisdom. History proves that sometimes popular opinions are not always true. That is why if a man wants to make changes he should make his own decisions based on his own values. For all the listed reasons, I do not agree that people should make decisions according to their popularity among others. On the contrary, decisions should be made according to one's own values and demands.

Should students be encouraged to question everything? It's one of the most important questions whether teachers should encourage their students to question everything. This issue is important because it can affect both their learning quality and their personal characteristics. I believe that it's better if students are encouraged to question every theory they are presented with, because it'll help them to develop critical thinking and to learn more about the given subject. First of all, I believe that encouraging students to question everything is better because it forces them to learn more. Questioning the offered material requires making researches on the subject, which demands reading and searching for additional materials. So letting students to question the given material encourages them to learn more. It also helps them to develop some skills that could help them in their future researches and projects. Additionally, I think that encouraging students to question the material is better because it helps to develop the skill of critical thinking. Students who learn to question the subjects of their study would eventually learn to consider every statement and every theory from all the different points of view. They would not accept any argument or any thesis without properly overthinking it and checking the facts that support that argument. This skill could be very helpful in their future adult life. For instance the students with critical thinking would be less prejudiced. Also they would fight against the wrong conventional opinions and dogmas. In general, students would learn to think independently. That reasons too, make me think that students should be taught to question everything. In conclusion, I believe that it's better if teachers encourage their students to question everything. I think so because all the above-mentioned arguments demonstrate that questioning everything is helpful for both students' learning process and for their future adult lives.

Time should never be wasted I agree that time should not be wasted. I think so because time is the most valuable asset of all and moreover, one can not get it back nor can it be bought. There is a saying that time is money. We have only 24 hours a day and we must manage to get all our job tasks done and also find time for our family and friends in this period. We also have to find time to exercise, eat and sleep. The truth is, the older we get the more tasks we have to accomplish and the less time we have. That is why successful people always use their time as efficiently as possible. They even hire special assistants who manage their schedules and take control of all their personal and business appointments. They do so because they know the value of time and they realise that it is priceless. I also think that time should not be wasted because it is impossible to get it back. We do not value our time while we are young. We waste it hanging out without a purpose or dreaming about the things we want to have. While we can use that time to learn new things, master new skills, make new friends and gain valuable experiences. Unfortunately, people usually realise it when time is gone and they regret that they can not get their wasted time back. I am sure that if time could be bought back, people would spend all their assets for it. For all that reasons I believe that time should never be wasted. On the contrary, one should try to use his time as effectively as he can. We should use our time productively, because it is the most precious thing that we have.

What time is better to work in? I work better during the day. It is easier for me to get the work done during the day because I am still full of energy and less distracted in the day-time. First of all I feel myself refreshed after the night's sleep so I am full of energy and more motivated to get things done. My brain functions at its full capacity, I am more creative and I can easily handle difficult tasks and situations. While in the night-time my internal biological clocks tell me that it's time to go to sleep so I feel myself tired, exhausted and broken. I also feel the unresistable urge to go to bed and close my eyes. Also I am less distracted during the daytime, so I can pay attention to every detail. I can easily control my behaviour and prevent the waste of time. In the night-time, on the contrary, I can't force myself to concentrate. I waste my time procrastinating. I am also unable to resist the temptations to check my profiles on social networks or watch new series of my favorite tv-shows. Furthermore, I am easily distracted by the sound of ticking clocks and water drops in the bathroom. Furthermore, I believe that it all has something to do with associations. For example the day-time is associated for me with the office-work, responsibility and action. While the night-time is associated with fun, entertainment and leisure. For all the above-mentioned reasons it is easier for me to work in the day-time. In the day-time I am more creative, productive and concentrated.

is patience is a necessary characteristic for a boss? I think that patience is one thing that every boss should possess. I think so for several reasons. First of all impatient bosses force their employees to hurry and thus to make mistakes. A wise boss should be able to estimate the complexity of his given orders and understand how much time would it take to his subjects to get the job done. If a boss underestimates the task and forces people to make the job faster than possible, it will have negative impact on the quality of the job and result in bad consequences for the company. Also, an impatient boss can cause the company big damage through the loss of company's best human resources. The fact is that an impatient boss makes his employees owerwhelmed by demanding more things done in less time. It leads to exhaustion and dissatisfaction of the personnel. Thus the employees start to leave the company in search of better work conditions. For all the abovementioned reasons I think that patience is of critical importance for any high-ranked manager. I also think that the companies should test the patience of the candidates before the promotion.