偷還是分裂 Split or Steal 在YouTube上，我看過一個很有趣的社會實驗。這些人參加這個活動之前不知道這個活動會涉及什麼。這個影片顯示一個遊戲，叫 “分裂還是偷”何處六個大學生會分開兩隊。他們玩之前已經有別人解釋規則給他們。如果兩隊都選 “分裂”，兩隊都贏 $300. 每個人贏到$100。我覺得不錯。 如果一隊選 “偷”，另一隊選 “分裂”，選 “偷” 這隊會贏 $1000， 選 “分裂” 這隊什麼都不贏。如果兩隊都選 “偷”，兩隊什麼都不贏。每隊一起去不同間房間聊聊要選什麼。如果選 “分裂” 需要把藍色的張卡放進信封, 如果選 “偷” 需要把紅色的張卡放進信封。聊完，兩隊會重聚， 然後同時打開信封給另一隊看選了哪一張卡。結果，一隊選了“偷”， 另一隊選了 “分裂”. 選 “分裂”這隊想玩得比較公平，覺得應為每個人是大學生，所以每個人應該可以贏一點。他們希望另一隊的想法一樣。可是，另一隊不體貼，錢不都要贏。從這個活動，我覺得雖然這個遊戲沒有費用， 可是有些人很貪心。另外，有些人想選 “偷”, 也願意一無所有，而不是讓另一個隊如果選 “偷”，贏所有的錢。 如果你去玩，你會選哪一個選擇？ I’ve seen an interesting social experiment on YouTube. Prior to attending this activity, they don’t know what the activity will involve. The video is of a game of ‘Split or steal’ where 6 college students form 2 groups of 3. The rules are explained to them prior to them playing. If both teams choose to split, both teams win $300. I think that’s not bad. If one team chooses steal, and the other team chooses split, the team that chose steal wins $1000 and the other team wins nothing. If both teams choose steal, then both teams win nothing. As a team, they have to decide between the 2 options. Each team goes into a separate room to discuss their choice. They have to place a blue card in the envelope for ‘split’ and a red card for ‘steal’. After discussing, the teams will reunite and then each team needs to reveal their card at the same time. In the end, one team chose steal and one chose split. The team that chose split thought they would play fair and thought that every person should win since they are all college students. They were hoping that the other team thought the same. However, the other team was not as considerate, they wanted to win all the money. I think this game shows that some people are greedy even though the game is of no cost to them. I also think some people would rather choose steal and risk leaving with nothing compared to letting the other team leave with all the money if they pick steal. If you played this game, what would you pick?