Profile
love...:
songwriting, playing instruments, singing, movies, talking about movies
Learning
German
Language Skills
KoreanNative
EnglishNative
Lesson Feedback
Lesson history
| Last month | Last 3 months | All time | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Completed lessons | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Attendance rate | 100% | 100% | 100% |
Teacher reviews
No record
Activities
- ~씨 : shade of meaning like Mr. ~, Ms. ~. It's a way to indicate someone formaly. ex. When you want to call '김민수' formally, usually you might say '민수씨' ~님 : much polite than ~씨. Normally this word is used for VIP, President or something like that. But in service industry, the company forces their employees to call their customer as '~님'. Bascially it has meaning of respect. ex. 교수님(Professor) is used when university student indicate their Professor with respect. But just as a kind of job, or without respect people call Professor as 교수 ~야 : it isn't a way to call someone formal, inversly, it is used between young friends, or when mom or dead call their children ex. When 김영희(Mother) call 김철수(Her Son) -> 철수야~0 votedSeptember 29, 20160
- How can I say 'I want you to take a seat' in German? Ich will dir, Platz zu nehmen? Ich will, du Platz nehmen? or something else? It seems grammatical structure is different with English. So I couldn't know How can I say 'I want you to~' in German. How can I say that? If I want to know further, with which keyword I should search on a internet? I searched causative verb, but I didn't seem what I was seeking Waiting for your help. Thank you!September 28, 2016110
- um zu = zum ? I knew zum as zu + dem, but today I saw these sentence. Ein Messer kann man zum Schneiden, zum Werfen, zum Essen oder zum schälen benutze Zum Spielen braucht der Klavierspieler ein Klavier. Um zu spielen, braucht er ein Klavier Damit er spielen kann, braucht er ein Klavier 1. Is this zum that I already knew?(zu + dem) Then, why 'Schneiden' and 'Spielen' are dative? 2. Or, does 'zum' have other role as a conjunction? I didn't find any other meaning in a dictionary. I'm totally confused. Waiting for your help. Thanks :)September 7, 201660
- It isn't literal translation, but it sounds more natural for Korean. 나는 바쁘게 지내지만, 틈틈히 쉴때마다 늘 네 생각을 해. Again literal translation of this sentence to English is following Although I always stay busy, but whenever I make a pause I always think about you. Literal translation of original sentence doesn't seem natural for me, as a native Korean speaker.0 votedSeptember 7, 20161
- haben ... fahren lassen, haben ... gelassen 1. Why 'lassen' is used instead of 'gelassen' here? Nach ihrer Führerscheinprüfung hat er seine Tochter den Wagen fahren lassen. 2. What's the difference between 'lassen from 1.' and 'gelassen from 2.'? Sie sucht die Schlüssel, aber sie hat sie leider zu Hause gelassen. 3. lassen oder gelassen with these sentences?, and what's the difference? Die Großmutter hat die Kinder abends lange fernsehen ____ Der Maler hat sich für das neue Bild viel Zeit ____ Sie haben das Bild mit dem Hirsch nur noch einen Tag nach Tante Margas Besuch hängen ____ Er hat seine Antwort offen ____ All I knew is 1) 'gelassen' is Perfekt form of 'lassen' 2) when 'lassen' is main verb, the second verb can be used without zu 3) when 'haben' is main verb, it usually means Perfekt and second verb should be used as p.p And 1. doesn't make sense with any of it. I would like to know what i'm missing is Waiting for your help. Thanks :)September 7, 201640
- Questions about Konjunktiv II 1. When I say 'Er würde eine große Tasse Kaffe mit Milch trinken' does it mean a) or b)? a) He maybe drinks a big cup of coffee with milk b) He would like to drink a big cup of coffee with milk 2. When I say 'Es ist Montag, aber er träumt, es wäre Sonntag' does it mean a) or b)? a) It's monday, but he dreamed it was Sunday (In his dream, it was sunday) b) It's monday, but he dreamed(he wished), it would be sunnday (He wished(dreamed) if it's sunday) 3. It seems there are two functions for Konjunktiv the first one is the sunjunctive(maybe) and the second one is expressing the will 'someone would be / someone would like to' then how can I distinguish the use of Konjuntiv II? I'm quite confused. Waiting for your help. Thanks :)August 31, 201660

00:00
00:00