Profile
Learning
English
Language Skills
Chinese (Mandarin)Native
Chinese (Taiwanese)Native
Lesson Feedback
Lesson history
| Last month | Last 3 months | All time | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Completed lessons | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Attendance rate | 100% | 100% | 100% |
Teacher reviews
No record
Activities
- "full-time education" essay The primary and secondary education is vital in a child’s growing up progress. While I accept that education is beneficial for the younger generation, I disagree that all of them should be forced to receive the full-time education. Some people argue that young people should attend the school courses for some reasons. The main reason is that schools provide them with compulsory courses, as well as a variety of elective courses from which they can freely choose according to their personal needs or interests. These courses can equip students with knowledge and skills that are indispensable for their further education and makes them more employable for the future job market. If a student dropped out in high school or even earlier, with little professional knowledge or practical skills, he or she would be unlikely to be offered a decent job and thus, lead a poor life. In other words, education is essential to prepare young people for a better life. In spite of the reason given above, I would still contend that not all young people under 18 should have a full-time education. The major drawback for requiring everyone to take school classes is that it can be a waste of time for a few youngsters whose talents lie outside the school courses. It would be better for their future development to allow them to leave school and focus on the areas they are good at, such as hosting, music, and sports. Another point is that keeping these students in class may cause noises or even disturbance, since they are unwilling to learn. In conclusion, I disagree the argument that all the young people should not leave the school education until they reach the age of 18.November 27, 201740
- Which word can I use to replace "writing"? Jane Austen is an important female writer in British literature expert in describing love affairs and marriage of young people and showing the lives and values of middle class people in 19th century UK. I feel that "describing" is kind of weird here but I don't want to use "writing" again. Which word can I use?June 15, 201740
- Translation work part1 These days, lots of people ask me to talk about “the tiger event”. But I have already told them there is nothing to say since so many people have already commented on that, leaving a limited space for further discussion. In fact, I used to be one of those people who enjoy discussing and criticizing current events. As a writer, it is, to some extent, inevitable to publish some kind of “objective” opinions on particular things to make myself look smart. However, I have come to realize over time that we could hardly be absolutely objective. Most comments are biased with the personal feelings of writers themselves and this is the reason why people tend to be divided in opinions. That is the part I feel most uncomfortable with because this kind of divergences or even conflicts are of no value. So are the debates evoked by the recent “tiger event”: Some debates emphasize on rules and others focus more on compassion. The former are based on rationality while the latter one sensibility. However, they are completely not the same thing. People view the problem from different perspectives. Furthermore, the fact is the man is already dead, after which, discussing whether he deserved it or not is actually a worthless consumption. It is like when you are trying to reason things out with your girlfriend, she says there is a problem with your attitude but you think she is not thinking logically at all and she, in turns, says you don’t love her. This kind of confusing and meaningless argument is what the entire Internet is filled with. So it is the reason why I choose to stand aside watching others discussing most of recent events. After all, talking in that way is just fine with your girlfriend, but it is completely a waste of time arguing with a bunch of people you don’t even know. So today I am not going to make any comment on this issue or to discuss whether the tiger is worth our pity or not, whether the dodger deserved to die or not. Instead, I would rather talk about the objectivity and the reason why most of us cannot be absolute objective. I remember somebody once asked me a question: “To what extent does one’s attitude to you affect your estimation towards him?” This is an interesting question. For example, someone does all kinds of evils but treats you nice, only you, and even saved your life. Would it make you reconsider your previous judgement and then come to the conclusion that he might have his own reasons doing so?May 26, 201730
- "le" in the first sentence can be considered as a sign of the present perfect tense, while "Ta men jia de hai zi wu liu sui" simply means the kid is 5 or 6 years old right now. As for "ba", it means the inference of the speaker. But if he ends the sentence with "ma", it is asking with no certainty.0 votedNovember 24, 20160

00:00
00:00