Profile
한국어를 공부하고 있어서 도와 주고 싶으시면 편하게 하세요! :D
Learning
Korean
Language Skills
SpanishNative
EnglishNative
Lesson Feedback
Lesson history
| Last month | Last 3 months | All time | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Completed lessons | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Attendance rate | 100% | 100% | 100% |
Teacher reviews
No record
Activities
- How to say "have been" in Korean Hello! In English, we use the expression "have been" all the time, but I still have no idea how to say it in Korean! The way I tend to want to translate it is by saying "~하고 있었다", but every time I say that, I am corrected to the present tense... so I have been (HA!) wondering how I could say this expression (if it's even translatable!) as I can't seem to figure it out. Examples: "I have been studying a lot these days." "I have been tired all morning." "What have you been up to?" (What have you been doing?) Thanks for the help in advance!April 5, 201642
- How to say "I can't ____ too much" Hello! Today I realized I didn't know how to say "I can't ____ too much" in Korean, which is kind of a problem because it's a very simple phrase in English... How would I translate that? Would Koreans even speak like that in the first place? Here are some examples of what I mean... "I can't talk too much today" "I can't go online too much today" "I can't play too much today" Thank you very much in advance! :)March 28, 201620
- Significa exactamente eso: "especialmente en el uso diestro de principales canonicos." Si necesitas ayuda traducciendo el paragrafo entero, dice: (excusa mi falta de tildes y 'ñ'es) "La estructura de la cancion parece a esas creadas por maestros del siglo 19 como Johannes Brahms y Robert Schumann, especialmente en el uso diestro de principales canonicos (yo no se que es eso) (en quales Brahms sobresalia) y en el uso del pulsante estilo cordal accompaniment (no se que significa esto, pero parece que es un termo musical acerca una parte que acompana a un instrumento o algo), como se puede encontrar en Schmann's "Ich grolle nicht" (de Dichterliebe, 1840)".0 votedMarch 28, 20161
- How to soften a sentence ("would") Hello! I was wondering how I would soften a sentence (or question) similarly to how we use the word "would" in English. For example, how would I translate a sentence such as, "How would a Korean person say that?" The way I would translate it normally is, "한국 사람들이 그런 것 어떻게 (말)해요?" but I don't know how to translate the nuance that saying "would" gives in English. If there is a possible translation for this, please let me know! Thank you very much in advance!March 16, 201640
- That's a very difficult quote, but I'd say it doesn't quite mean that. "Humane" has more to do with that something treats others fairly and safely, without causing damage (or preventing as much damage or pain from happening as possible). So, in the quote, I would say it means "to live a full life in which we treat others well, avoiding causing harm." I hope you can understand what I'm saying, but judging from the quote you are studying, your English must be pretty good :)0 votedFebruary 24, 20161
- The sentence itself is wrong, but I'll try to help! It possible the person wanted to say "He's very much kind of trying to repair the damage, really." In this case, it means that the person is trying to repair the damage. "Kind of" doesn't really mean a lot, but it makes the sentence sound more soft.0 votedFebruary 24, 20161
- Buena pregunta! Al no ser un profesor de inglés, no te podré dar una respuesta basadas en reglas o cosas así, pero trataré de darte ejemplos... En general, uno puede decir cualquiera, pero tal vez cambiando la oración un poco, como.... "This is harmful to your body" Y "This is damaging to the body" Pero, a la misma vez, uno puede decir, "This is harmful to the body," pero diciendo "This is damaging to your body" suena un poco menos natural en comparación a las otras frases, por lo menos a mi oído (pero en una conversación normal, nadie de verdad oyera la diferencia). Si quieres una definición de las palabras, harmful tiene más que ver con que algo es dañino, cuando damaging tiene más que ver con que algo activamente esta causando daño. Como puedes ver, básicamente es lo mismo. En mi opinión, no tienes que de verdad diferenciar entre estas dos palabras, al no ser que ya hablas un inglés muy bueno, en cual caso yo creo que sería una mejor idea solo oyendo en cuales situaciones las palabras son dichas, en debe de estudiar las diferencias mismas. Buena suerte!0 votedFebruary 24, 20160

00:00
00:00