Profile
Learning
Japanese
German
Spanish
Language Skills
DanishNative
EnglishNative
Lesson Feedback
Lesson history
| Last month | Last 3 months | All time | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Completed lessons | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Attendance rate | 100% | 100% | 100% |
Teacher reviews
No record
Activities
"Greencard-ordningen er ophævet med virkning fra den 10. juni 2016."
ok, nå.... tilsyndeladende* har folketinget besluttet at holde op med at uddele greencards til udlændinge som mig selv. De kan virkelig virkelig godt lide at komplicere processen, nå? og det skete* kun i forgårs!
Jeg ville gerne lære* og bo i danmark én dag, men nu er jeg ikke sikker på, at jeg nogensinde vil gøre det*.
*suk* hvad tænker I om det her?---
EDIT: *en ekstra fejl: tilsyneladende, ikke tilsyndeladende
*du mangler et "e"
*du skriver ikke, hvad du gerne vil lære. Jeg går ud fra, at det er dansk? ;)
*formen "at jeg nogensinde vil gøre det" er ikke så god. Jeg vil sige "at jeg nogensinde har tænkt mig at gøre det" (intention) eller "at jeg nogensinde kommer til at gøre det" (intention eller mulighed) eller "at jeg nogensinde kan komme til at gøre det" (mulighed)
0 votedJune 13, 20162- あげる is giving something from the speaker's point of view. くれる is someone else giving something to the speaker from the speaker's point of view. When it's in third person, e.g. someone that is not the speaker gives something to someone that is not the speaker, you look at it from the receiver's point of view. エイリアンが何かを人類にくれた Aliens gave something to humanity (This is from the receiver's point of view, someone gave them something) So in both questions, you should use くれる. Someone gave something to you? くれる. Someone gave something to someone in your family? Look at it from the receiver's eyes and use くれる. The same goes for some stranger giving something to another stranger etc.0 votedJune 13, 20161
- Question about nuances of てくる 水を取り出してきてくれ 水を持って来てくれ Is there a difference in the nuances of these two sentences? I assume the first one is similar to 行ってくる in that it means "please go and fetch water and come back", and the second one only asks the person to come back with water, not to go out and fetch it by using 持って来てくれ, which is also why the second one uses kanji for 来る and the first one does not. Am I wrong?June 13, 201650
- "Mon" kan ikke oversættes direkte til engelsk. Det er et adverbium, der bl.a. bruges i (oftest indirekte) spørgsmål for at udtrykke usikkerhed. Det svarer lidt til "I wonder" på engelsk. Hvilken bil er mon den hurtigste? = I wonder which car is the fastest Mon det virker? = I wonder if it works Vil han mon gøre det? = I wonder if he'll do it Det bruges også i høflige spørgsmål (så de ikke virker så påtrængende) Mon du kunne række mig vandet? = Could you pass me the water? (her kan man ikke bruge "I wonder") Når "mon" bruges sammen med "ikke", udtrykker det, at noget er meget sandsynligt (mere end 50 %, efter min mening) Mon ikke han har en computer derhjemme = He probably has a computer at home Mon hun ikke ændrer sin mening = She's probably going to change her opinion "Mon ikke" (som et fast udtryk) kan bruges om noget, der er helt sikkert/helt afgjort. Smager det godt? Mon ikke! (helt sikkert!/helt afgjort!/eller udtrykket "det må du nok sige!") Jeg håber, du kan forstå, hvad jeg har skrevet, ellers kan jeg skrive det på engelsk :)0 votedJune 13, 20162
- Some questions about てくる Hi there. I do not understand when てくる is going AND coming back, and when it is simply something coming towards the speaker. For example, could 出かけてくる mean both "x is going out and coming back" AND "x is coming out of something towards speaker" (but has not been at speaker's location yet)? Also, can you use the ている form with てくる and ていく? Is 走っている来ます grammatically correct? If you can't, how do you differentiate between an ongoing action and some general action? Thank you.June 13, 201670

00:00
00:00