Search from various English teachers...
Profile
I've studied Polish literature and language for two years, but after this summer I'd like to start studying Latin and Greek classics. Catholic by choice, conservatist by heart, post-modernist by environment, bookworm, failed messianist, speculative monarchist, militant counter-revolutionist, fan of XIXth century German prints, old breviaries and missals and generally pre-war books. In addition, Simon Magus searching for Helen.
Learning
Italian
English
German
Bulgarian
Language Skills
PolishNative
Latin
Lesson Feedback
Lesson history
 Last monthLast 3 monthsAll time
Completed lessons000
Attendance rate100%100%100%
Teacher reviews
No record
Activities
  • Answered
    I'll try to point some rules. First, dopelniacz is a case of possessor, thus an equivalent of English "of" and Saxon genitive: sword of justice- miecz sprawiedliwości, Dawid's shirt- koszula Dawida etc. Second, it serves as a case marking a motion away from something: I'm driving out of Warsaw- Wyjeżdżam z Warszawy. Next, dopełniacz is often used as a case of the direct object, notably when the ruling verb has a negation: I don't have a car- Nie mam samochodu (dopelniacz), but: I have a car- Mam samochód (accusative- biernik).
    0 voted
    July 16, 2008
    0
  • Answered
    Such lines are actually not accents, they are signs of different sounds indeed ;)
    0 voted
    July 16, 2008
    0
  • Answered
    Considering it's etymological aspect, "chociaż" seems to be a somehow lengthened form of "choć". But, as it was said, there is no difference (if we don't count metrical forms of the poetry of course ;)
    0 voted
    July 1, 2008
    0
  • Answered
    As contemporary Polish has only one past tense (czas przeszły), perfective version of umieć is umiałem (masculine singular first person), umiałam (feminine singular first person), umiałeś/aś, (second person singular m/f), umiał/umiała/umiało (third person sing. m/f/neuter), umieliśmy/umiałyśmy (first person plural m/f), umieliście/umiałyście (second person plural m/f) umieli/ umiały (thirs person plural m/f).
    0 voted
    May 23, 2008
    0
  • Answered
    I think potrafić i umieć are more close to each other than móc. Still, potrafić seems to be more official, e.g. Uczeń potrafi wymienić najważniejsze wydarzenia- A pupil is able to point the most important events. However, I don't see general difference in usage of potrafić i umieć. E.g. "I can sing" can be rendered as "Potrafię śpiewać" as well as "Umiem śpiewać". As far as I understand the Polish usage, both verbs can be used synonymously. 1.Móc expresses often a possibility. E.g. :"Nie możesz mnie zabić" means "You can't kill me" (because, for example, I believe you are too honest person to kill me, or I'm persuading you, that killing me won't be good thing for you) while "Nie potrafisz mnie zabić" means "you don't have enough skills to kill me". 2. Móc expresses also state of being allowed to do something, e.g. "Mogę spacerować"- "I can walk" (when I was prisoned, I couldn't, but now I can). 3. Móc, however, can be sometimes used as a synonym of potrafić and umieć. Nie potrafię wysłać emaila- I can't send an e-mail (I'm not enough skilled to do this) can be equivalent of Nie mogę wysłać maila. The latter, however, can also mean "I'm not allowed to send an email". 4. Móc tells us also, that there is a possibility, that something can happen: Niemcy mogą tu wrócić- Germans can come back here. I must say, that your question made me think a lot about this verbs. I'm not sure I can give a general rule, but I can resume as follows: 1. Potrafić, umieć and móc can be use in the sense of "having certain skills" 2. Móc can express state of being allowed to do something, while other two verbs can't. 3. Whether móc means "to have a skill" or "to be allowed to" can be easily learned from a context. 4. Móc express possibility that something may happen (the other two verbs can't).
    0 voted
    May 23, 2008
    0