Profile
Всем привет,
Я занимаюсь русским языком уже 2 года. А уже 20 лет занимаюсь английским языком. И турецкий мой родной язык.
Я очень люблю эти языки и говорить на них. Если вам нужна практика, пишите мне пожалуйста!
Learning
Russian
German
Language Skills
TurkishNative
English
Lesson Feedback
Activities
- Let's write an IELTS essay #7 Since the industrial revolution, mankind has been causing environmental pollution which has some significant consequences in today’s world. Global climate change is one of those consequences. Majority of the analysts argue that in twenty years, the effects of global climate change will be much more severe. According to them, mankind will suffer from hurricanes, extreme heat, and drought. Nevertheless, there is no consensus among the scientists and governments regarding the methods of prevention of those consequences. While some argue that individuals should change their lifestyles to minimize their carbon footprint, some claim that large businesses are the sole reason for global climate change, and governments should use sanctions to prevent global warming. In this essay, I will argue that global climate change can be successfully prevented only if everyone on the planet unites against it including individuals, governments and all sorts of businesses. To begin with, individuals have a lot to do with global warming. This is largely because shopping habits of consumers determine the end-products that businesses develop. For example, there are certain types of gasses in deodorants which are associated with global warming, if people become more conscious choosing the products without those harmful gasses, gradually businesses will manufacture their products without those harmful ingredients. Similarly, if people stop buying oil-burning cars, and prefer electric cars instead, manufacturers will be designing electric cars. When viewed in this light, it becomes evident that consumer behavior is a determinant factor in end-products, therefore consumers can prevent global climate change to some extent. On the other hand, mainly governments are responsible for global climate change. Reason for this is that it is axiomatic that governments have a huge authority not only on individuals but also on businesses. Companies are in general very sensitive on the manufacturing costs contrarily, they are not that much sensitive on detrimental effects of the manufacturing processes on the environment. For instance, governments can issue regulations to eliminate usage of some chemicals and some manufacturing processes which are related to global climate change. Therefore, governments have a significant role in fighting global climate change. - To be continued in the comments section -September 5, 201831
- Let's write an IELTS essay #6 In some countries, marriages are arranged by the parents but in other cases, people choose their own marriage partner. Discuss both systems. Families have long been regarded as the building blocks of a society. In that connection, marriage is what makes those building blocks stay together. This is the reason why the society, especially the elderly perceive marriage as a substantial matter. In fact, in some cultures, parents involve in the process of choosing marriage partners for their children. While, some commentators argue that people should choose their life partners without any parental intervention, others claim that parents are much wiser than their children, and they are more aware of the consequences of an unhappy marriage. In this essay, I will argue that people should be able to choose their marriage partners, nevertheless it could be wise taking advice of the elderly into consideration. To begin with, people are generally more satisfied with their marriage when they choose their own marriage partner. This is largely because of the human psychology, a person generally undervalues the mistakes, and overvalues the right choices he makes. For example, I always blame my parents for the wrong choices they make for me, however I never appreciate the right choices they make for me. In contrast, I am always satisfied with the consequences of my own choices. Therefore, the society should allow people to choose their own marriage partner. On the other hand, it is axiomatic that people should consult some other people when taking a major decision, results of which are able to change their life. Essentially, marriage is one of those decisions, and consulting the elderly on that matter may help people eliminate irreversible mistakes. For instance, getting married to a person with criminal records, or a person who regularly gets divorced to take advantage of his ex-spouse might result in traumatic results in a person’s life. When viewed in this light, it becomes evident that parental advice should be taken into consideration choosing a life partner. To conclude, free will is essential choosing a marriage partner for the aforementioned reasons. Nevertheless, making use of the elderly’s, most importantly parents’ opinions could be a wise idea as people are to prone to making mistakes when it comes to life choices.September 4, 201800
- Let's write an IELTS essay #4 In recent decades, technology has begun to eliminate the need for several professions. Nevertheless, the question whether it is possible to utilize technology to translate text and speech to another language as accurate as human translators has recently sparked some heated controversy. While some linguists argue that artificial intelligence (AI) is not capable of learning a language like humans do, some AI experts claim that AI is much more capable than a human mind, and machine translation (MT) is just a simple task compared to the tasks for which artificial intelligence will soon be used. In this essay, I will argue that MT will be if not more, as accurate as human translation, and it will take the place of human translation in the near future. To begin with, large-scale technology companies such as Google and Microsoft believe that MT will someday be as accurate as human translation, and they invest greatly in research and development of MT technology. Those tech companies develop products, which will provide an instant translation at a minimal cost. The technology behind those products is machine learning, and machine learning algorithms get better as they have more input and output samples. Therefore, I think it is just a matter of time for MT to be as accurate as human translation. On the other hand, there is a good number of people who argue that translation is an artistic work, and MT will never be able to translate literary works. Reason for this is that translation of literary works sometimes requires adaptation of the text, as literature by its nature comprises cultural elements. Those cultural elements, even if accurately translated, will not be understandable for those who are not familiar with the culture. A possible solution could be recognition of translation of literary works as a type of art, that way it could be ensured that it would not be evaluated as a shortcoming of MT. To conclude, at the first glance, there seem to be some shortcomings of MT, and some may argue that MT will never be as accurate or as beautiful as human translation. However, If you exclude the translation of literary works and recognize that type of translation as a type of art, considering the scales of research and development practices of tech companies and progress so far, it is clear that mankind will soon witness perfect machine translations.August 27, 201811
- Let's write an IELTS essay #3 --In most countries multinational companies and their products are becoming more and more important. This trend is seriously damaging our quality of life.-- With the advent of globalization, many multinational companies aim to reach every single consumer on the planet. However, the adverse effects of that trend have recently sparked some heated controversy. While some analysts argue that as multinational companies spread throughout the world, our quality of life gets better, some claim that disastrous consequences of that trend outweigh the benefits. In this essay, I will argue that operations of the multicultural companies should be regulated by authorities to minimize the damages on our quality of life, only that way they can serve humanity. To begin with, many large-scale multinational companies contribute to humanity’s social and economic development. This is largely because, those companies create job opportunities in various parts of the world, whereby they decrease the unemployment levels in countless countries. For example, in my country, Turkey, a good number of multinational companies conduct operations. Those companies generally offer higher wages and better working conditions compared to the local ones. It is therefore clear that, multinational companies increase the quality of life of a percentage of employees. On the other hand, local businesses suffer from financial losses as multinational companies target their customers. Reason for this is that cost of services and goods are lower for large scale companies. As a result small to mid-scale businesses cannot compete with them. For instance, a popular multinational restaurant chain, McDonalds threw a considerable number of local restaurants out of the competition in numerous countries. Thus, it is safe to claim that multinational countries destroy not only the local businesses, but also the local cultures. To conclude, in some ways multinational companies damage the quality of life of the society, however, in other ways they create opportunities for local peoples. It is obvious that, a clear-cut answer to the question whether the harmful effects of multinational companies on our quality of life outweigh the benefits require a quantitative sociological research, which is beyond the scope of this essay. Nevertheless, to minimize the damages, governmental and intergovernmental authorities should intervene with the operations of multinational companies in order to protect the competition.August 27, 201810
00:00
00:00