Search from various English teachers...
Profile
I'm a native speaker of Arabic (Egyptian dialect & classical), and I'm fluent in English. I'm very interested in learning new languages and French is the one I'm currently working on as I took French back in school. I'm also interested in Japanese, and maybe Chinese some time in the future.
Learning
French
English
Japanese
Language Skills
ArabicNative
Russian
Lesson Feedback
Lesson history
 Last monthLast 3 monthsAll time
Completed lessons000
Attendance rate100%100%100%
Teacher reviews
No record
Activities
  • Posted
    l'étranger, première partie, IV Mersault et Marie vont à la plage, ensuite ils rentrent chez Mersault et restent sur son lit. Le matin prochain, ils ont de petite-dejeuner, et Marie demande à il s'il l'aimait, Mersault reponde qu'il lui semblait que non. Ensuit, Raymond et son maitresse se battre et il la frapper. Un agent vient chez eux et il le gifle. Raymond demand à Mersault d'etre temoin, il accept. Le vieux Salamano perds son chien au champs du Manoeuvres. Raymond et Mersault lui disent qu'il pouvait lui rendrait s'iul irait à la fourriere et paierais quelques droits. Un peu apres, le vieux aller et venir. Mersault peut entendre qu'll pleure.
    April 29, 2019
    3
    1
  • Answered
    The root for "to talk" is ك ل م, the word for "word" is كَلِمة أتكلم = to talk أتحدث = to converse Therefore, both words are perfectly suitable for expressing what you want to say, but engaging in a conversation implies that there must be a person at whom you address your conversation, on the other hand you could just "talk" even if no one is listening. معك = with you, إليك = to you. 1. أنا أتكلم معك = I'm talking with you (signular) 2. أنا أتحدث إليكم = I'm having a conversation to you (plural, but in this case I would rather use "with you"): أنا أتحدث معكم 3. أنا أتحدث معك = I'm having a conversation with you (singular). To say to someone "I'm talking to you", as to grab their attention towards the fact that you're addressing them in conversation, I'd say: أنا أكلمك
    0 voted
    February 25, 2018
    1
  • Answered
    If you really want to dig deep, I looked this up in Lisan Al-Arab. This is what I found (goto page 56 in the Lam chapter): http://ia800209.us.archive.org/28/items/waq10576/11_10586.pdf Here is a brief translation of what it has to say on the root ب ط ل: the root بطل means to for something to be gone or be lost, the thing is therefore باطل , and باطل is the opposite of truth, or something that's worthless, and أبطل is to commit باطل (that is, to lie), and البطلة means witches, and a man who is بطال is a man of باطل. And البطالة is being ignorant and wasteful. And البطل is a brave man (hero) a man who distinguishes between heroism البطولة and being wasteful البطالة، and it was said that he is called بطل because the tough men يبطلون (lose their worth) at encountering him, and it was said that it is he at whom the blood of relatives تيطل (become obsolete), that is you are unable to obtain blood vengeance from him, and to some it's a noun that has no verb.
    0 voted
    February 25, 2018
    1
  • Answered
    You're correct. Her pronunciation is wrong. Nun is a solar letter and the Lam shouldn't be pronounced.
    0 voted
    January 20, 2018
    0
  • Posted
    Nous avons plus de toutes les choses Je pense à l'idee qu'il y à quelques personnes qui n'ont que juste l'argent suffisant pour achetter du pain pour le jour. Et puis, il y à encore quelques personnes qui n'ont pas rien. Biologiquement, peut-être le seule objectif de la vie est qu'on doit survivre pendant le plus longtemp possible, mais maintenant, nous les humans avons plus de toutes les choses. On ni pense pas à si on aura l'argent pour vivre, ni donne le procréation la même importance (parce que la majorité de les infants ne mort pas). Alors, nous commençais à chercher le sens de la vie. Nous allais vers le science, art, philosophy, et religion. Something about the notion that a man has exactly enough to afford to eat, or him not even sure whether he can afford to eat that day moves me. Biologically, perhaps the only purpose of life is to survive for as long as possible, but as we humans have reached a level in which affording to live is not something we think about (or at least for most of us), and that procreation is not as prioritized as it used to be (especially that the vast majority of newborns no longer die), we started to seek deeper meaning for life. We started to delve deeply into everything and we moved towards science, art, philosophy, and religion, to add new dimensions to life. في حاجة بخصوص ان الانسان يكون معاه بالظبط اللي يجيب بيه أكل أو مش متأكد هيكون معاه ولا لأ بتحركني. جايز من الناحية البيولوجية الهدف الوحيد من الحياة هو البقاء لأكتر وقت، بس احنا كبشر لما وصلنا لمرحلة ان توفير المعيشة دي حاجة مش بنفكر فيها (أو أغلبنا)، وان التكاثر معادش بنفس الأولوية زي زمان (حصوصا ان الأطفال مش بيموت تلات ارباعهم) بدأنا ندور على معاني أعمق للحياة. بدأنا نتعمق في كل حاجة واتجهنا للعلم والفن والفلسفة والدين عشان نضيف للحياة أبعاد تانية.
    January 19, 2018
    2
    0
  • Corrected
    0 voted
    January 14, 2018
    0
  • Corrected
    0 voted
    January 8, 2018
    0
  • Answered
    When you're in an unjust position, but completely helpless. You feel sorry for yourself.
    0 voted
    January 6, 2018
    0
  • Corrected
    0 voted
    January 6, 2018
    0
  • Corrected
    0 voted
    January 3, 2018
    0