1. Opinion: "Beautiful" is only someone's opinion. It's not an objective description. Different people think different things are beautiful. So when you say "She has beautiful eyes", you're only expressing that you THINK they're beautiful. To someone else, they might be simply pretty, or even ugly. 2. Description: "Brown" is an objective description, since her eyes are really brown. You don't just think they're brown. 3. Type: It refers to the thing you're describing. Basically, it means that, when you're describing something, you should first state your opinion of the thing, then give an objective description of the thing and, lastly, name the thing. But I don't think you should stick to it so strictly :D People will understand you even if you don't describe things in this order. E.g.: She was a warm-looking, chubby old lady. Warm-looking - this is how she appears to me; it doesn't necessarily mean she really is a warm person (opinion) Chubby - she really is chubby; this is her physical appearance (description) Old lady - this is the object of your description (type)

Gröt och skinka, lilla appelbiter... :D Nej, jag skojar lite.

I Kroatien äter vi skinka, kalkon med <em>mlinci</em> (en traditionell kroatisk rätt, väldig god :)), eller fläsk, och sedan olika sorts kakor: av nötter elle vallmofrön, pepparkakor... Och kål eller fransk salad (jag vet inte vad det heter på svenska egentligen , kanske rysk salad eller salad <em>olivier</em>).