Search from various English teachers...
Profile
Ciao, sono Trish e vivo in Australia. Ho studiato l'italiano per alcuni anni e sono al livello intermedio. Vorrei praticare con le persone,via uno scambio di lingua. L'italiano per me e' un a passatempo, non devo farlo. Fammi sapere quando sei disponibile a parlare, perche` la differenza in tempo puo` essere difficile. Salute, Trish
Learning
Italian
Language Skills
EnglishNative
Interests
Films & TV Series
Music
Reading
Art
Sports & Fitness
Lesson Feedback
Lesson history
 Last monthLast 3 monthsAll time
Completed lessons0042
Attendance rate100%100%98%
Teacher reviews
Cristina
Italian
Jul 13, 2023
Simpaticissima Trish, complimenti davvero per il tuo bel livello d'italiano, parli tranquillamente di qualsiasi argomento! 😊
Giulia Alice
Italian
Oct 10, 2021
Grazie Trish per la lezione, è sempre un piacere lavorare con te.
Giulia Alice
Italian
Sep 13, 2021
Oggi abbiamo lavorato con i verbi per sulla comprensione di un testo. Abbiamo anche condiviso, idee ed esperienze. Ottimo lavoro.
Giulia Alice
Italian
Sep 4, 2021
Una bella conversazione, abbiamo parlato di diversi temi con naturalezza. Una ottimo punto di partenza per lavorare insieme.
Activities
  • Commented
    Ciao Stefania, Vorrei essere felice fare uno scambio di lingua con te. Fammi sapere, Trish
    0 voted
    October 24, 2022
    0
  • Commented
    Ciao Rosario, Vorrei felice fare uno scambio di lingua con te. Fammi sapere, Trish
    0 voted
    October 24, 2022
    0
  • Commented
    Ciao Edoardo, Se vuoi parliamoci su Skype, cioè possiamo fare uno scambio con inglese E Italiano. Fammi sapere, Trish
    0 voted
    October 24, 2022
    0
  • Posted
    Sono Trish da Australia e sto cercando un partner con cui parlare italiano e fare uno scambio . Mi scrivi se vuoi e possiamo aiutarci con le lingue.
    October 21, 2022
    0
    0
  • Commented
    I am having difficulty finding the section for language partners.
    0 voted
    April 19, 2022
    0
  • Corrected

    Frelancers or employees (PART 2)

    From an ideal point of view, freelance jobs look much better. The first big advantage is freedom. You can decide, in theory, what, when, where you will be doing things. You can chose the people you want to work with and the ones you don’t. You can schedule your holidays for the time and in the period you wish, in theory.
    The hard side of a  freelance job is that you have responsibilities, much greater than that of employees. You have to find the job, do it keeping yourself motivated and focused on your target. Also, if there are employees who  work with you, you have to motivate them and find the resources to pay them. Bear the results of failures and pay the consequences. So, greater freedom also means more stress. You can never think: I will do my job, and if I do it well that’s enough: full responsibility of failures is yours, though you properly carried out the job.
    However when things work if you are in the right business, if you have acceptable margins compared to the efforts you have to spend to carry on your business I think that freelance jobs are the most satisfactory. They give to people the possibility to fully express themselves, to drive the evolution of their business, and of their lives, just in the direction they love.
    0 voted
    May 26, 2018
    2
  • Corrected

    Freelancers or employees (PART 1)

    In my career, after university, I had the opportunity to try several jobs, at least four related to different business areas. One of them was a freelance activity, the others I did as an employee, the typical 8 hours-5days job.
    Trying to evaluate these two opposite situations, I could say that choosing one or other job category deeply influences the lifestyle and the mental attitude of a person. In one word, people are formed by the jobs they choose.
    Employees, in particular the ones who work in big companies, have the sensation (though it is mainly an illusion) of a safe, sure, defined future. Something that they can plan since they have regular, fixed incomes, they know their working time and they can plan their holidays. The fee to pay for such a good stability feeling is freedom. Employees (I’m speaking for the average employee, there could be exceptions) sell their time rather than their knowledge and skills. They have to build their knowledge according to the company policies and targets, they have very small margins for creativity. In small companies the situation is even worse, since the employee lives in  very close contact to the owners, there’s a direct connection between actions and economical consequences. So the stress levels can be very high and the control frequently unbearable, in particular when the bosses want to impose their style of working.
    0 voted
    May 26, 2018
    2
  • Corrected

    PART 3 Migration and relationship with “origins”

    Moreover another thing happens: time passes, and passing time modifies also the place of origin. I remember one day I was talking to a girl with an Italian heritage, about this topic. She complained about the “strict” Italian mentality of her granny (yes, the stereotype you all think about Italians), declaring that it was strict because it was Italian. However it was strict because it was a 1930 mentality, maybe just a little bit worsened by the Italian origin.
    Cultures are in continuous evolution, so my mum’s Italy is no longer mine. Or at least, there are substantial differences. Particularly in the last century that was characterized by an increased speed in changes.
    The third generation, if immigration takes place in an inclusive culture (it means if the ethnic group isn’t forced to keep close to survive, fighting against the community they are entering), lose  ninety nine percent of the links to their grandparents’ origin. They lose the language, lose the mentality, the gap starts being so wide and deep that the micro points of contact can be considered almost meaningless. They still remember something of what they were told by their relatives, but is something far away from the real world in which they live. They set up families with other culture’s members and become part of their culture, which is a very good and natural thing, I think.
    Maybe some fossils can survive, such as very special traditions during feasts, food traditions, some words used in the domestic context, but they are more related to a domestic familiar context than to some connection to the original context. This traces in fact, in most cases, to the loss of the true original meaning and acquires new meanings that are a sort of mediation between the two mixing cultures.
    So, I think, three generations is the time required for a full assimilation of a foreign population in a different culture, trying to find an inclusive environment.
    0 voted
    April 25, 2018
    2
  • Corrected

    Friendship and secrets

    The following piece is not something I wrote on my own, it’s taken from a famous Italian novel of the 19th century.

    One of life’s biggest reliefs / pleasures ( is better here) is friendship; and one of friendship’s benefits is to have someone to tell our secrets to. Now, friends are not paired by two, as happens with married people. Everyone, in general, has more than one, and this forms an endless chain. When, then, a man looks for the relief of telling his secrets to his friend, he creates within his friend the desire to have the same relief retelling the story to someone else. Normally he begs the friend not to discuss this matter with anyone else, and this request, if literally respected, would immediately stop the long chain of mutual comfort.However generallly  practice limits the secrecy obligation just to a friend that can be considered as much good as the one from whom the secret has come, imposing on him the same secrecy condition. So, passing from a trustworthy friend to another, the secret moves along that infinite chain, coming at the end to the ears of the man that were supposed never to be informed about that. Normally, the walk? maybe progression of this secret would be very long if each person had just two trustworthy friends: one from whom the secret comes and another to tell the secret to. Actually  some lucky men do exist that have hundreds of trustworthy friends, and when the secret reaches one of these men, the spreading speed increases faster and faster and it’s no longer possible to follow its track.
    0 voted
    April 25, 2018
    2
  • Corrected

    Pills of history (1)

    Antefact: this is a mere writing exercise, it does not pretend to be a documented historical essay.
    According to a diffuse trend, that involved the whole of  Europe during the XIX century, the medieval and modern fragmentation, that  characterised the Italian peninsula since the end of the Roman empire, started to be felt as inappropriate. A certain group of intellectuals, mainly from the central and northern Italy, but also in southern regions, proposed the idea that the Italic peninsula had to be considered as a unique, original, country.
    This was something new and exceptional: till the Napoleonic wars the whole Country had been divided into a dozen  small and large independent states, partly ruled by local lords or republics, partly under foreign dominions. Piedmont and Sardegna were ruled by Savoia, a local dynasty. Milan state (western Lombardy), after the fall of the local dynasty of Visconti/Sforza in the XVI century had passed from one hand to another, from Swiss to French, then Spaniards and Austrians as the last ones. Trento and Friuli were ruled by Austrians. Veneto and Eastern Lombardy were under the dominion of St. Marco’s Lion, the Venetian republic, that was extended also to many areas of Croatia. The centre, which excluded Tuscany was controlled by the pope and his administration. Tuscany remained for a long time under the rule of the Medici family, then passed into the hands of Austria. The south had been for a long time in the form of one or two independent kingdoms (Regno di Sicilia and Regno di Napoli were unified and split sometimes), passing from the hands of the French to the Aragoneses, then to the Spanish crown.
    In synthesis, a huge complexity and fragmentation that is reflected still nowadays in the extreme cultural and artistic particularism that’s typical of Italy.
    Napoleon, once invaded Italy, founded two new political organizations: one was the kingdom of Italy (probably a reminiscence of the medieval Regnum Italie, that was probably just the centre and northern Italy) and the Kingdom of Naples, an independent country with its own government.
    After the fall of Napoleon and restoration of the status quo the previous complexity was restored, with the only exception being  the cancellation of the ancient Repubblica di Venezia, whose territories were included in the Austrian Empire.
    0 voted
    April 15, 2018
    2