A person can make a miracle.

When humans talk about a miracle they think it can made only by God  (only come from God). It is not so. Every person is able to (preform might work a little better here) make a miracle   
Today I read a story about a little boy. His parents abandoned him. This woman in the photo took him and saved his life.So this women made a big miracle. She changed this kid's life and she also changed her own life. Now look at how happy this kid is. I think this woman is even (even suggest a slight surprise of contrast) happier than this kid.

Thank you for reading and for correcting.

Hope this helps! : )

What had happened = An event in the past Will not be forgotten = a resolution for the future. I would put "it" just hasn't been memorized/remembered fully yet = An event (likely tragic) happened and people will not forget, but the event is not remembered fully yet (maybe because of some cultural factor like media distraction or political ideology) You should use "has not been + past participle" You do this because you are using the present perfect. It has not been memorized. You are referring about the something in the PAST that is still relevant TODAY in the PRESENT. Remember whenever you see "have" in any form referring to the past, it usually requires a past participle. Had + past participle = 1. I had eaten breakfast before 2. I went to work. 1. Had+ past participle= Shows something happened BEFORE something else. What had + participle: happened. For example: Present Perfect=I have studied (this is important now and well as the past) Past Perfect= I had studied (this action is done and is not now) I might use "remembered" instead of "memorized" because, usually, "to forget" and "to remember" are very close opposites, while "to memorize" suggests a conscious decision to study and retain information. "Fully" suggests that the memory is there, but that it is not completely available to the mind yet. Hope that helps : )