Search from various English teachers...
Profile
Hey there! My name is Alexander, and I am a half-Korean guy born and raised in Norway. I speak both Norwegian and English fluently. After having studied in Korea, I now know Korean very well - though being back in Norway means I am getting less practice than before. I achieved TOPIK level 6 in the summer of 2020. My main priority over the next couple of months, though, will be relearning French. I have to take a language level test for a job application process in mid-June, so I hope to get my French abilities as good as possible within this time frame. I would self-evaluate myself to be between A2 and B1, with written and listening comprehension being far better than my oral and spoken abilities. One of the biggest challenges is the lack of vocabulary and practice more generally.
Learning
French
Korean
Language Skills
NorwegianNative
English
Lesson Feedback
Lesson history
 Last monthLast 3 monthsAll time
Completed lessons0055
Attendance rate100%100%100%
Teacher reviews
Woojae Jun
Korean
Nov 12, 2014
Alexander understand most of the grammar I teach in really fast pace, and since he is able to make sentences without making many error, with larger vocabulary pool, he'll be able to do basic conversations.
Woojae Jun
Korean
Oct 24, 2014
To make your curriculum I had to test his Korean skill and later discuss what we're going to do. I'm glad you enjoyed the class(even though it technically wasn't one) and I'm looking forward to see you soon. Keep up the good work!
Activities
  • Posted
    바람직한 성역할은 無? **저는 색맥입니다. 빨간색을 잘 안 보여서 수정할 때 빨간색 대신 다른 색깔을 이용하시면 감사하겠습니다. 이 글은 주제를 정리할 겸 시험 연습을 할 겸 썼습니다. 미투 운동 덕분에 성역할에 대한 담론이 다시 강화되고 있다. 남자는 어떤 태도를 가지면 바람직하는가? 여자는? 당연히 역사적으로 우리 세대만의 이야기가 아니다. 옛날에도 바람직한 성역할에 대한 치열한 의논이 있었으며, 특히 서양에서 전통적인 집안일과 유가에만 집중하는 여성 역할에서 강하고, 운동을 잘 하고, 전통적 고정관념으로 남자가 가장 잘 하는 일을 잘 하게 되는 여성을 원하는 사회로 바꿨다. 남자는 딱딱하고 감정을 보여주지 않는 것에서 다정다감하고 가족과 시간이 많이 보내는 남자가 좋은 걸로 인식도 바꿨다. 동아시아는 변화는 조금 더 느림에도 불구하고 그런 변함이 점점 이루어지고 있다. 그러나 이런 성역할도 바람직하는가? 페미니즘의 기본적인 소원은 사회적인 남녀 평등이다. 생물과학적으로 차이가 있음에도 사회적으로 성역할에 대한 이야기가 악용되지 않은가? 생물학적으로 차이가 있음을 인정하면서, 남자는 이렇게 해야 한다, 여자는 그렇게 해야 한다는 말이 없애야 평등을 이룰 수 있다고 생각한다. 그래야 우리가 사람을 사람으로 본다. 즉 성역할 같은 개념을 없으면 남녀에 대한 편견이 없어져 여자로서, 남자로서 행동을 하지 않고 대신 인간으로서 행동을 할 수 있다. 인간으로서 성으로부터 생각하면 안 된다. 인간이라서 인간으로부터 생각해야 한다. 생물과학적 차이가 있으나, 남녀 간의 차이는 실제로 그렇게 크지 않다. 군대에 들어간 여자들은 잘 할 수 있고, 유가를 하는 남자도 분명히 잘 할 수 있다. 우리 사회에선 편견이 많고, 평등이 뭐냐는 질문에 대해서도 수많은 답을 들을 수 있다. 내가 생각하는 남녀 평등은 이미 소개해 준 말에 속한다 – 인간은 인간으로서 봐야 된다는 말. 굳이 더 구분할 필요가 일상생활에 거의 없다. 여자는 생계를 유지할 수 있고 다른 사람에게 피해를 주지 않으면 엔지니어를 되고 싶으면 되고, 집안일을 하고 싶으면 된다. 남자는 생계를 유지할 수 있고 다른 사람에게 피해를 주지 않으면 엔지니어를 되고 싶으면 되고, 집안일을 하고 싶으면 된다. 인간이니까.
    July 29, 2020
    3
    0
  • Posted
    말하는 것이 부족함 여러분 안녕하세요! 제가 italki 안 쓴지 아주 오래됐네요! 요즘 한국에 살고 있지만 한국말 그렇게 많이 쓰지 않아요. 가게에 가거나 할머니 길 찾아서 물어보면 물론 써야 하긴 한데 제 한국친구들과 놀 때 보통 영어로 얘기하거든요. 그리고 제 말하기 실력은 아주 부족하니까 그냥 한국말로 얘기하자고 하면 좀... 저를 물어보면 보통 문제가 아는 단어가 작아서 그런다고 하는데 사실이에요? 그냥 연습하면 나아질 거죠? 어떻게 해결할 수 있나요? 말하는걸로 집증하는 수업 다니는 것이 제일 좋을 텐데 문제가 돈이에요. 외국에 공부하는 학생이라서 돈이 항상 문제죠.. 그러면 언어교환은 다른 방법인데 잘 맞는 파트너 찾기 힘드네요. 서울에 있는 모임에 가봤는데 운이 별로 없었어요. 다른 모임으로 가야 하나요? 제 대학교에서 있는 언어교환 파트너 한번 찾았는데 한국에 학생이 너무 바쁘네요. 하긴, 계속 노력하면 좋은 파트너를 찾을 수 있죠? 셋번째 방법은 녹음이에요. 뭔가 읽어서 녹음하거나 뉴스앵커나 잘 말하는 사람을 따라하면 될까요? 얘기하는 연습 아니지만 조음을 잘 배울 수 있죠? 말하는 실력이 더 높아지면 자유롭게 얘기할 때 녹음할 수 있고요. 녹음의 장점이 뭐가 잘 하고 뭐가 잘못하는 것이 다시 들을 수 있거든요. Italki 여러분 말하는 것을 나아질 방법에 대해 어떻게 생각하세요?
    August 21, 2018
    2
    0
  • Corrected
    0 voted
    January 16, 2015
    0
  • Corrected
    0 voted
    September 14, 2014
    0
  • Posted
    영국에 갔어요 어제 저는 영국에 공부어서 영국에 갔어요. 비행기가 노르웨이를 한시에 떠났어요. 그레서 공항을 12시에 도착핬어요. 내 비행기 여행은 좋았어요. 짧은 이야기가 읽었어요. 영국 대학교에서 공부해요. 이 대학교가 Brighton에 있어요. 여기 대학교 두개 있어요. 내 가을 학기는 9월 22일에 시작할거예요.
    September 12, 2014
    9
    0
  • Corrected

    Removal  Addition  Comment  of interest


    Death and myself

    Today is my first day here :)


    As a “human beings”, we all share the same final destination, which is death.

    You're using the plural pronoun 'we', so 'human beings' should be plural. We're all not just one single being, are we? 

     

    We are bound to die someday, but so many people pretend as if they were are immortal, living their lives.

    They're not looking back and think 'at that point in time, I <em>was</em> actually immortal, but not any more.' Instead, although they might have thought so in the past as well, your point is that they think so right now, and, as such, the present tense should be used. Or did I miss something? 

     

    Besides, so many people take death as a completely negative thing. However, I believe it should not be taken that way. People should try to take “death” more positively. I remember when I was studying English through the commencement speech made by Steve Jobs, who I respect so much. In front of a large number of Stanford students, he made a very wonderful speech. He said “Because almost everything – all external expectations, all pride, all fear of embarrassment or failure – these things just fall away in the face of death, leaving what is truly important. Remembering you are going to die is the best way I know to avoid the trap of thinking you have something to lose.”, and this impressed me a lot at that time. Considering he had gone through crucial pancreatic cancer, his remark on death may sound very dramatic and some people think it was merely one of the methods to fear less in the middle of facing death, but healthy people too should remember they are going to die at any time unexpected.

    'Any time unexpected' sounds very poetic to me, and perhaps not the best formulation for this more philosophical text. I'd suggest to reword it to read '... but healthy people too should remember they can die unexpectedly at any time', but I'm sure there are other ways to formulate it as well.


    Facing death, people can become honest to themselves, and herethat is the whole point. 

    The use of 'here', at least to me, insinuates that the point is somewhere to be found in the physical world, such as in the British House of Commons or in the kitchen. We're not speaking about a physical point, though, but rather an abstract one.

     

    Remembering we are all going to die is one of the good ways to be honest to myselfourselves as well as this world.

    Again, you're speaking about 'we', and the reflexive pronoun should reflect that. 


    I really believe so. Sometimes, we worry too much on petty things. We fear too many things. For example, I lack confidence. Some of my friends just apply for any activities that look fascinating to them, but me? I worry too much before I start any activity. I fear what if I am not good at this?that I am not good enough.

     The sentence is weird as it is; it starts as a declarative sentence and ends as an enquiring one. There are many ways to reformulate the phrase, mine is just a suggestion. :)

     

    What if I am not better than other members? What if I fail? What is the funniest thing is that I have many pretty hair accessories, but I cannot actually wear them because people might think "Sshe is pretending to be cute!" >_< ;;

     

    But now I am going to change myself.

    Just a note here: Traditionally, one could not start sentences with conjunctions such as 'and' and 'but'. This has changed slightly with the years, and it has become acceptable in colloquial settings. However, some people might consider it wrong, and you should try to avoid it completely in formal settings. 

     

    I am not gonna compare myself with other people, feeling inferior. I am a wonderful person, and I am ready to grab every opportunity that is lying ahead of me because this is my life and I can live this life only once.

    This last part here reminds me of a quote by Eleanor Roosevelt: 'No one can make you feel inferior without your consent.'

    It seems like you have a very healthy attitute towards life and death! To me, death is as much a part of life as life itself is. If we celebrate life, why should we denounce death? If we look at Yin and Yang, one cannot exist without the other. Without brightness, darkness would not have existed. Without day, there would be no consept of night. Without sound, there would be no silence. Without death, then, would there be life? 

    0 voted
    August 29, 2014
    1
  • Corrected
    0 voted
    July 31, 2014
    0
  • Posted
    Le futur immédiat de mon français Salut, tout le monde ! Comme une part de ma licence, je vais étudier une semestre dans Corée du Sud les printemps prochaines. Donc, c'est impératif que j'améliore mon Coréen rapidement. Malheureusement, je pense que cette focalisation signifie un moment dans la vie dans laquelle je ne peut pas travailler beaucoup avec mon français. Comme une personne qui aime français, c'est pas une conséquence idéale pour moi, mais que'est-ce que je peux faire ? Je sais que le premier semestre dans la deuxième année d'université demande beaucoup, et avec l'acquisition du Coréen, je vais pas avoir beaucoup de temps. Peut-être je vais avoir le temps pour écrire une note quelques fois, mais mon activité ici, à italki, vas devoir focaliser sur Coréen. - Alex
    July 28, 2014
    0
    0
  • Posted
    이 / 가 subject particles practice 이 도서관이 조용해요. = This library is silent. 펜이 비싸요. = The pen is expensive. 한국어가 조금 어려워요. = Korean is a little difficult. 음식이 맛있어요. = The food is delicious. 레몬이 셔요. = The lemon is sour. 강아지가 귀여워요. = The puppy is cute. 방이 깨끗해요. = The room is clean. 빵집이 더러워요. = The bakery is dirty. 음악이 좋아요. = The music is good. 간호사가 예뻐요. = The nurse is pretty. 눈들이 아름다워요. = The eyes are pretty. 빵이 맛없어요. = The bread is tasteless. 자동차가 싸요. = The car is cheap. 커피가 차가워요. = The coffee is cold. 차가 달아요. = The tea is sweet. 캠퍼스 켜요. = The campus is big. 날씨가 더워요. = The weather is hot. 미국 음식이 짜요. = American food is salty.
    July 28, 2014
    9
    0
  • Commented

    As was said so eloquently by Malsikof, and emphasised by Bruce, I'd like to put forward the argument that instead of speaking of actually 'falling in love' with a real person, you're instead falling in love with an illusion. That illusion might very well perfectly represent the person you believe is on the other side of the internet, but more often than not it does not. This illusion is the qualities and ideas that your mind is associating with that person, but these qualities and ideas, when associated with a person you've only met online, are often only based on your own imagination. In other words, if you believe you 'fall in love' with someone online, you're falling in love with an idealised version of that person. 

     

    I'm not saying that those emotions you feel are false, though. They are only false in the sense that you've most likely fallen in love with a slightly different person than you think. I would personally define the feelings you'd have for a 'virtual' person as 'excitement' rather than actually falling in love (though, this might just be my very personal definitions and visions of the world speaking). I have myself felt this 'excitement' for people I've not met physically, but there's a profound difference between that 'excitement' and actually falling in love, and that is that the excitement can only lead to the shattering of an illusion (whether or not you also like the real deal is another question), whilst actually falling in love could possibly lead to relationships and whatnot.  

    0 voted
    January 31, 2014
    0