Another argument against the claim has to do with the beneficial effect art has had on humanity. First, [有猶如不决的滋味, 要一針見血!] Art can nurtures, guides and inspires us in our life. 多餘 By learning to Art appreciation e art works, people can improves our soul and humanity.  In turn; gives us a greater understanding our of society our life.  After all we are not mindless automatons doing the same mundane tasks day and and day out until the end of our lives.  This is not humanity. [我觉得句字不够, 因此用这些来加強, 免去反駁机会] their comprehension of society, and thus be reassured about their life; can explore their own inner emotions and be more inspired and persevering in(?) (the?) striving to improve the quality of life. Next, art Not only this, it also spawned the entertainment industry where it had created countless number of jobs. has also helped create innumerable jobs and solve social problems. In Today’s China, many are seeking their careers in this growing sector which in turn spurs countless to major in the arts and entertainment. more and more people are finding jobs in the growing entertainment industry. An increasing number of students are choosing to major in the art field, and the empirical evidence shows that they will have already secured highly paid jobs upon graduation. 虽然翻譯與表示沒錯, 寫这种水準高的英文论文, 字句不够雅, 因為你要学写好英文文章所以我這样大改, 希望你学得一二  Even independent artists seem unlikely to won't be starving.  They always have a knack for creating their own vocational creative niche, in which they can to express their labour of love while at the same, making a decent living. Finally, by in supporting art projects, the government will also be able to reduce unemployment and generate collect revenue [through taxes]; this cyclic system will ensure that the basic material comforts are available. all serving to fulfill the need for surviving. 

In sum, the basic need for In the end, basic survival needs outweighs everything  any other and should be given precedence. However, the claim premise of the topic title fails to account for address the inability of the government with respect to the when dealing with the Arts, and of how financial resources when it comes are used to the solve of long-lasting [永遠!] term problems. Besides, [太敷衍] Funding the Arts can also(coexists with “besides”?) amount to another that helping to reduce financial problems [翻譯沒錯但意味不一样] of daily life but  human suffering. Finally, but given the finite amount of economic resources we should strike there must a balance struck between welfare and the funding of the Arts[confused? What I really wanna [don't ever use "wanna", "gonna" or other such slang in formal settings.  It will cost you plenty in the eyes of the examiner.]  mean is “a balance between the amount of money spent in welfare and art ”].

the Proper Use of Public Resources 題目每个重字的首部必要用大寫

On the other hand are two compelling arguments against the claim. [沒錯, 这種正式的论文最好能寫為, "There are two counterpoints against this claim"]

下面的, 不是語法问題而是英式论文的表法.  

The first one is the never ending of human suffering and the second one being, its intrinsic benefit of art to us humans.

英式是先要告許读者那东西是什么, 然後長細议论

One is that human suffering is enduring and There is no economic solution to human suffering. Every Each society has troubles to deal with the problems of poverty, unemployment and economic inequality.  which spring from certain All these cannot be avoided as they are part aspects of human nature. Although financial measures such as relief and there are charity and financial aid to alleviate and elevate   have helped enhance our living standard, it is not up to the government but to our economists, jurists, social reformers and educators.  and comfort level(?), in the meantime it is by reforming[reform?in this meaning”reform”is a transitive verb,so is it cannot be used as a verb (reforming) but without a object? ] and enlightenment--that is ,up to our economists, jurists,social reformers and teachers--not the government--to mitigate these problems. On the other hand 用得好(?),if excessive money flows goes into the welfare budget(?), it would(will?) impair(?) individuals motivation to find work will be killed. Just take a look at the northern European welfare system. [英試论文要有強調, 你表示不够強] Consider the northern European welfare states, where the disparity between wages and vacation compensation is so small that many people choose less competitive career or even not to work. This has increased society’s burden, hampered economic growth, and in turn, impede(?) the maintenance of social welfare(policy). The difference between wages of different jobs and vacation compensation is so minimal that it is human nature to select the easier jobs or worse still, not to work at all. Why work when you get taxed but get paid by the social system to be unemployed [加強你的议论] Hence, economic growth is slowed to a crawl and the burden of social welfare increased dramatically; and in the end, the entire system is unsustainable. 從你的中文的意味.

in case of some confusing places , I have written it again(by translating) in my native laguage, and hope this could help know what I want to express.

可能有些地方英语表达地不清楚让人不好理解，我用自己的母语又写了一遍（其实是翻译了一遍），希望能帮您理解我的意思。

另一方面是两点反面观点。第一点就是，人类的痛苦是长久存在的，没有经济方法可以解决。每个社会都面对着贫穷、失业和经济分布不均（贫富差距）的问题，这些问题来源于人类本性的某些方面。虽然财政措施如救济和帮助帮助我们提高了生活条件和舒适程度，但同时，解决这些问题（应该）考改革和启迪人民--也就是说，靠我们的经济学家、法学家、社会改革者和老师，而不是政府。并且（另一方面），如果过多钱流入福利预算（福利开销），就会减少人们想工作的动机。以北欧福利国家为例，在那里工作报酬和休假补助的钱差不多，以致于很多人就会选择竞争小的职业（工作），甚至不工作。这就加重了社会负担，阻碍了经济发展，并且，使社会福利很难再维持下去。

另一观点与艺术对人类的有益作用有关。第一，艺术可以在生活中滋养并引导我们。通过学习欣赏艺术作品，人们能提高对社会的理解力，因此就能对自己（目前的）的生活安心（安于现状、逆来顺受、知足常乐）；（通过学习欣赏艺术作品，）人们能开发内心的情感，变得更加有激情、更加有毅力，来努力提高自己的生活质量。第二，艺术也创造了无数工作岗位。在今天的中国，越来越多的人在发展中的娱乐产业找到了工作。越来越多的学生学习艺术专业，并且，经验（证据）表明，他们（选择了艺术专业）在毕业时就会保证能得到高工资的工作。即使独立的艺术家也似乎不会挨饿--他们永远都有为自己创造工作岗位的能力，在这样的岗位上，他们能表达对艺术的爱，并且能一边挣钱生活。最后，通过帮助艺术项目，政府也能减少事业、创造收入，这些都能满足生存的需求。

总之，对生存的基本需求比其他任何（需求）更重要，应被优先考虑、优先处理。但是，题目的观点没能说明政府处理艺术（问题）时的无能，以及财政资源解决长期存在的问题的无力（无能）。此外，资助艺术也能减轻人类的痛苦。最后，考虑到有限的经济资源，我们应（将对艺术的资金、和对福利的资金）分配得平衡合理。