Search from various English teachers...
Profile
Learning
Swedish
Language Skills
CatalanNative
SpanishNative
English
Japanese
German
Interests
Art
Food
Films & TV Series
Gaming
History
Lesson Feedback
Lesson history
 Last monthLast 3 monthsAll time
Completed lessons009
Attendance rate100%100%100%
Teacher reviews
No record
Activities
  • Posted
    This content violates our Community Guidelines.
    Nov 10, 2026 8:19 AM
    0
    0
  • Posted
    "Se llegó a ser director." I see this one a lot. Every other verb of change takes se, so learners add it here too. Hacerse and llegar a ser both mean "became", and both are about a path you chose. The difference is the climb. Hacerse is the step: se hizo abogado, he became a lawyer. Llegar a ser is where you end up after years of work. Llegó a ser socio del bufete. = He worked his way up to partner at the firm. And it's the one that never takes se. Llegó, not se llegó.
    #
    Nov 3, 2026 1:35 PM
    0
    0
  • Posted
    "Me puse enfadado." Grammatically it holds up. Hardly anyone says it, though. English builds the change with "get": get angry, get tired, get bored. So learners grab ponerse every time. But Spanish usually has the change packed into a reflexive verb already. Enfadarse doesn't mean "to be angry", it means "to get angry". Me enfadé mucho. = I got really angry. Same with cansarse, aburrirse, asustarse. Before you build "get + adjective" with ponerse, check whether the verb already exists.
    #
    Oct 29, 2026 9:20 AM
    0
    0
  • Posted
    "He got sad" and "he became sad" sound close in English. In Spanish they need two different verbs, and the question that picks one is how long the change lasts. Se puso triste. He got sad (this afternoon, he'll be fine tomorrow). Se volvió triste. He turned into a sad person. Ponerse is a passing state: mood, nerves, going red. Volverse is a change in who someone is, and usually one nobody chose. Same adjective, and the verb alone tells you if it was a bad day or a bad few years.
    #
    Oct 20, 2026 8:05 AM
    0
    0
  • Answered
    Understanding a lot and speaking very little is the normal gap after years of only listening. Listening trains recognition. Speaking needs retrieval, and that only gets trained by pulling the words out yourself, even badly. Something that works: after a video, pause and retell what you just heard, out loud, in two or three sentences. Same topic, same words you just met. You'll hit the exact gaps that freeze you in conversation, and those are the words worth looking up. Also, simple phrases are fine. At A2 that's what speaking sounds like, and fluent speakers lean on them all the time too.
    0 voted
    Oct 20, 2026 8:04 AM
    0
  • Posted
    Ask a learner to say "I met María in 2019" and you usually hear "Encontré a María" or "Me reuní con María." The first means you found her or ran into her. The second sounds like a work meeting. Spanish says: Conocí a María en 2019. Conocer is knowing a person. The preterite points at the moment something started, and the moment you start knowing someone is when you meet them. Saber does the same trick. Supe la verdad ayer: I found out the truth yesterday. Same verb, but in the preterite it's the second the knowing began.
    #
    Oct 13, 2026 8:32 AM
    0
    0
  • Posted
    Ask a learner if they liked the paella and a lot of them say "Sí, muy." Or "Me gustó muy." That muy has nothing to hold on to. Muy only works right before an adjective or an adverb: muy rica, muy bien. It can't stand alone, and it can't go with a verb. The trap is English "very much." Spanish drops the "very" and lets mucho do all the work: Me gustó mucho. (I liked it a lot.) And the short answer is just "Mucho."
    #
    Oct 6, 2026 8:21 AM
    0
    0
  • Posted
    "Sé cómo nadar." Almost every English speaker says it, and it sounds a little off to a native ear. The "how" is already inside saber. Saber plus an infinitive means knowing how to do something, so adding cómo says it twice. Sé nadar. I know how to swim. Same with sé conducir, sé cocinar, no sé bailar. Cómo only comes back when you mean the method, not the ability: sé cómo se hace, I know how it's done.
    Sep 28, 2026 9:04 AM
    0
    0
  • Posted
    Most learners choose between comí and comía by asking whether the action finished. But everything in the past finished. That question can't help you. Ask this instead: is it the event, or the scenery around it? Estaba comiendo cuando llamaste. (I was eating when you called.) The eating was already going on. It's the backdrop, so it takes the imperfect. Your call is what actually happens in the story, so it takes the preterite.
    #
    Sep 25, 2026 9:34 AM
    0
    0
  • Posted
    Most learners say "pedí por un café" at some point. The por is doing nothing there, and it is the English leaking through. English has ask and ask for. Spanish cuts it in a different place: pedir is for things you want, preguntar is for things you want to find out. The "for" already lives inside pedir, so por has no job. Pedí un café. (I asked for a coffee.) Le pregunté si venía. (I asked her if she was coming.) The test is what comes back to you. An object or an action, pedir. Information, preguntar.
    #
    Sep 22, 2026 9:09 AM
    0
    0