Profile
おっす!
僕はマリッシといいます。日本語を勉強しています。日本語と日本文化が大好きです。 ビデオゲームに熱中します。
Learning
English
German
Japanese
Language Skills
PolishNative
Lesson Feedback
Lesson history
| Last month | Last 3 months | All time | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Completed lessons | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Attendance rate | 100% | 100% | 100% |
Teacher reviews
No record
Activities
- I see this this way: は is a topic particle. You use it, to show the topic. Use it when you are talking about something that the person you are talking to know about, or what was mention earlier. が is a identifier particle. Use it when you wants to identify something unspecified, or when you bring new information to the conversiation. Quote: "The two particles 「は」 and 「が」 may seem very similar only because it is impossible to translate the difference directly into English. For example, 「私は学生」 and 「私が学生」 both translate into, "I am student."* However, they only seem similar because English cannot express information about the context as succinctly as Japanese sometimes can. In the first sentence 「私は学生」, since 「私」 is the topic, the sentence means, "Speaking about me, I am a student". However, in the second sentence, 「私」 is specifying who the 「学生」 is. If we want to know who the student is, the 「が」 particle tells us its 「私」. You can also think about the 「が」 particle as always answering a silent question. For example, if we have 「ジムが魚だ」, we are answering a question such as "Who is the fish?" or "Which person is the fish?" or maybe even "What food does Jim like?" Or given the sentence, 「これが車」, we can be answering the question, "Which is the car?" or "What is the car?" The 「は」 and 「が」 particles are actually quite different if you think of it the right way. The 「が」 particle identifies a specific property of something while the 「は」 particle is used only to bring up a new topic of conversation. This is why, in longer sentences, it is common to separate the topic with commas to remove ambiguity about which part of the sentence the topic applies to."0 votedDecember 13, 20080
- Plural endings of words in genitive: * Maskuline: - ów (koty -> kotów; dęby -> dębów;) - i (nauczyciele -> nauczycieli) - y (harcerze -> harcerzy; węże -> węży; talerze -> talerzy) *Feminine -i (powierzchnie -> powierzchni; kawiarnie -> kawiarni; idee -> idei; zbroje -> zbroi) -ów (nudy -> nudów) -y (noce -> nocy) -0 (ziemie -> ziem; męki -> mąk; Anie -> Ań) *Neuter -i (narzędzia -> narzędzi) -y (wybrzeża -> wybrzeży) -ów (muzea -> muzeów) -0 (jeziora -> jezior; pola -> pól) Plural endings of words in accusative: * Maskuline: The same as plural genitive with personal words and the same as plural nominative with impersonal words. *Feminine: The same as plural nominative. *Neuter: The same as plural nominative.0 votedDecember 10, 20080
- I'm gonna show you, how the dialogue could look in every-day language. Władcamuch30 has showed you a proper translation translation, but it still sounds like it'd be in a textbook. I'll do it more colloquialy. It's hard to catch the drift at first but it will often come in handy if you do. So here we go: - Cześć, co tam? ('Cześć' can be replaced with: 'sie ma', 'sie masz', 'elo', 'hej'; 'co tam' can be replaced with: 'jak tam', 'jak leci', 'co tam u ciebie') - Dobrze, a u ciebie? ('dobrze can be replaced with: 'spoko', 'ok', 'w porządku'. In this place people often say what happened in their live recently.) - Też. Długo czekasz? (You can say "na autobus" - "for the bus" but it is not necesssary, and even sounds a bit strange) - No (The most colloquial answer possible. 'No' means 'yes' in Polish and you articulate it like english "noh". You can also say: 'no, długo', 'no, ale coś nie przychodzi/przyjeżdża') - Dobra, musze lecieć. ('musze lecieć' can be replaced with: 'spadam', 'znikam', 'lecę') - Ok, na ra. ('Na ra' is an abbravation from "na razie'. You can use both versions.) The 'yes' should be omit. NOTE: The dialogue can appear only between two people who know each other. You cannot ask strangers "how are you" 'couse you will recieve strange looks from them ^^. It doesn't work like in english.0 votedNovember 30, 20080

00:00
00:00