| Last month | Last 3 months | All time | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Completed lessons | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Attendance rate | 100% | 100% | 100% |
- I agree with Phil, it's really a nonsense word. And, surprisingly, (or not) it has made the dictionary. It's popular culture, so many people are familiar with it, but I can't imagine it being used, except jokingly, among friends. Also, let me correct you, the word is - "supercalifragilisticexpialidocious". Have a look at the Wikipedia article: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Supercalifragilisticexpialidocious0 votedMay 31, 20150
Pozdravljanje[1]
Bok! Ja sam Mirjana iz Mađarske. Dolazim[2] iz Pečuha, ali živim u Budimpešti. (Ja) pričam govorim[3] mađarski, finski, engleski i malo hrvatski. Ja sam grafičarka[4] i radim kod[5] kuće, imam fleksibilno radno vrijeme. Budim se u 7 (sedam) i ujutro pijem uvijek čaj, rijetko kavu. Učim hrvatski(,) jer moja baka[6] je bila Hrvatica. Ona je umrila prije tri godine. Nadam se da jednom ja ću govoriti hrvatski bolje.[7]
1) "Pozdravljanje" is a verbal noun and, as such, it denotes an action, so we wouldn't use it in this context. Were you using English while writing this? That might have confused you, since English does allow a verbal noun here ("greeting").
2) The sentence is okay, but I would like to suggest the adverb "inače". It usually means "otherwise", depending on the context you could translate it into English as "besides", and it can also mean "usually, normally", as it would in this case. This is to avoid confusion, as we would we would (also) use the expression "dolazim (iz)" ("I come (from)") to denote the place/settlement we live in (which in your case is Budapest). I presume you were born (and raised?) in Pecs, and only later did you move to Budapest.
So the sentence would be "inače dolazim..." or "inače sam...", "normally I come from..." or "normally I am from..."; suggesting that what you mean is "by birth/origin", which you could do as well by using the adverb "rodom". The root "rod-" conveys in it the meaning of "birth" and "blood relation" (roditi: to give birth; porod: birth; roditelj: parent; rodbina: relatives; and so on).
3) "Govoriti" - "to speak"; "pričati" - "to tell". The languages we speak, and what we tell are stories (priča; plural: priče). Standard language is very strict about this, but in everyday language this is not that big of a deal; I'd say that most Croatians make that mistake. :D
The pronoun "ja" is in brackets because it's not necessary (you can tell from the verb who the subject is), but it's not a mistake to leave it either, if you wish.
4) Again, the same as above regarding the pronoun. You may leave it, of course, but if you should choose to omit it, just know that the word order would change to "grafičarka sam".
5) "Kod" - "at"; "od" - "from". It would be better saying "radim od kuće" ("I work from home").
6) This is fine, using the possessive pronoun (moja), but using the personal pronoun ("ja") in dative case (short form "mi", not "meni") would sound more natural. This type of dative is the so called possessive dative and, as the the word itself suggests, it denotes possession (in true sense, like owning an object, a thing; or else relation). You would literally translate this as "to me" into English ("grandma to me"), although this is not a construction that's natural in English. The sentence would then be: "jer mi je baka bila Hrvatica".
I googled a bit and found what appears to be a similar thing in Hungarian. The sentence is: Nekem nincs testvérem. So maybe you can compare it and understand easier.
7) Croatian is very flexible when it comes to syntax (word order), we can figure out the meaning, but it does sound unnatural. So my suggestion would be this: "Nadam se da ću jednom bolje govoriti hrvatski"; and I would definitely suggest leaving out the personal pronoun ("ja"), unlike the example under number 3, where you really can let it stay. Because in this case it would sound like you're trying to emphasize the subject in contrast to someone else. Like you're comparing yourself to someone who doesn't speak Croatian well, and you hope that <em>you</em> will one day be able to speak it better (than the other person).
***
Miriam, this is really great for an introduction, and I bet it wasn't easy! Our languages are very different, but they're grammatically complex in a somewhat similar way, so I'm sure you'll get the hang of it. Good luck with learning! :)
0 votedMay 13, 20154- No problem. Really? That's interesting! Thanks for that piece of information. :D One more thing occurred to me - just like in AE, you can also use the verb "uzeti" (to take) instead of "kupiti" in this context (or any other, for that matter, but if it's too ambiguous it would, of course, be better to use "kupiti" so that "uzeti" wouldn't be mistaken for stealing).0 votedDecember 8, 20140
- Hi, Shawn! You've already found out that the word order is alright. I just have another proposition for the sentence - omitting the verb. So, then you'd get: "Moram u Starbucks (...)" which sounds more fluent and would be commonly used (if not even more so than the version with the verb) in everyday speech especially. Another way could be "moram do Starbucksa".0 votedDecember 1, 20140
Michelle, that one with the monkeys is great! :)
***
As for the birds, we also have a similar one. <em>Bolje (i) vrabac u ruci nego golub na grani</em>. Meaning: <em>better [to have] a sparrow in your hand than a pigeon on a branch</em>.
And something similar to these which Miguel wrote:
Quien a hierro mata a hierro muere. - Tko se mača laća, od mača i pogiba. - This one is biblical, so I guess there's a version of it in all European languages.
Quien con niños se acuesta, mojado se levanta. - Tko s djecom liježe, popišan se budi.
He gave the English version (with a dog and the fleas), but literally it's similar to Croatian. One who lies with children, wakes up wet.
Wet with urin, obviously. :D Except the Croatian version is more vulgar, "popišan" means "pissed upon".
0 votedAugust 27, 20140I also recommend <em>Kon-Tiki</em> and <em>Den Brysomme Mannen</em> that Søren suggested. I haven't seen the rest of the films he suggested, but they really seem interesting. I'll definitely check them out, thanks, Søren! :)
And I recommend <em>Nord</em>. (http://www.imdb.com/title/tt1252610/)
0 votedAugust 25, 20140- Topo morto gave you a good answer; [b] is voiced, whereas [p] is unvoiced. If the sound is voiced, the vocal chords vibrate, if it isn't, they don't. These two ([b] and [p]) are a voiced pair. That means that your mouth is the same when you pronounce those two (it goes for any voiced pair). How your lips are positioned, your tongue. Here your tongue is low and relaxed, your lips completely close for a brief moment before opening which altogether gets you that [b] or [p] sound. The difference is in your larynx - when pronouncing a voiceless sound, it's relaxed and doesn't really move; when pronouncing a voiced sound, it's a bit tense and in a somewhat lower position. Try listening them here: [b] http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/2/2c/Voiced_bilabial_plosive.ogg [p] http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/5/51/Voiceless_bilabial_plosive.ogg Now, if you can't hear the difference at all, then I'm afraid that can't really be helped. But don't be discouraged right away, it could be that you simply haven't yet become aware of it, because you don't "expect" there to be a difference or something similar, something "psychological". Another voiced pair is [s] and [z]. Mind that it's not the same as letters, as letter "s" can be pronounced in various ways in English, for example, words "salt", "measure", "busy". So, [s] as in "salt", "snake" and [z] as in "zebra" or "busy". If you can hear the difference between those two, you should also be able to hear it between [b] and [p], and other voiced pairs (at least eventually, as I said). Try listening someone pronouncing those words or pronounce them yourself. Do you hear the difference? And one more thing, you mention aspiration. That something else, and both [b] and [p] can be aspirated.0 votedAugust 23, 20140
