Day 2. Another ordinary day. It's 11:31 pm. The deadline is close. But I don't feel sleepy, at least. Today I've finished reading a book. You know, my guilty pleasure is reading not sophisticated literature. And this book is of this sort. In my defense, there's a statement that it's even good to read low-quality literature. That is, to understand what actually makes literature "good" and "bad". Waste paper, "toilet literature", garbage. These are the words my compatriot would say if I name what I've read to them. Yes, I'm talking about a work of the queen of the so-called "Ironic detective" genre — Daria Dontsova. (All the Russians reading this can spit in my face right now) But what I really wanted to discuss (but now I lack the time to do it, so it's going to be short; maybe someday I'll write an essay on this topic) is a controversial ethical question raised in the book. Is it morally wrong to euthanize terminally ill children? Quite a serious issue for "toilet literature", don't you think? I feel bad when I lie, even to complete strangers I'll probably never meet in my life. So, I'm hesitating about sharing my opinion. Will italki ban me if I do it? Will anybody proofread this exercise? Will anybody ever proofread any of my exercise texts? As you've already guessed, dear reader, my answer is no, it's not wrong to euthanize terminally ill children. Let the child pass away peacefully, end the suffering of the parents. Frankly, I think it's actually morally right. Uh, from what I've written here I got two things: 1. I write slowly. Too slowly. 2. It'll be beneficial to me to learn using more linking words and in a more accurate way. 3. I'm running out of time. Ooops. Feel free to share your opinion, I'll be glad to read it. But please, be respectful to me and other people. And thank you for reading this gibberish!