Search from various English teachers...
Profile
Language Skills
EnglishNative
Lesson Feedback
Lesson history
 Last monthLast 3 monthsAll time
Completed lessons000
Attendance rate100%100%100%
Teacher reviews
No record
Activities
  • Answered
    Olga, you are right about species. We can say "The sea turtles are protected by the government" or "The sea turtle is protected by the government" or "Sea turtles are protected by the government." All of these mean "All sea turtles." English is strange, isn't it?
    0 voted
    February 28, 2012
    2
  • Answered
    In real life, it is more common to say, "It is cold this month." You could say, "This is a cold December." In this case, I am comparing this December to past Decembers.
    0 voted
    February 28, 2012
    0
  • Corrected
    0 voted
    February 28, 2012
    0
  • Answered
    It has two meanings: This is completely my fault. and All of this is my fault.
    0 voted
    January 27, 2012
    0
  • Answered
    You have two choices: How do you say it? What do you say? In the first sentence, you want to know the method. (How do you say ______?) For example, "How do you say 'computer' in French?" or "How do you pronounce 'can' in English?" In the second sentence, you want to know the thing that you say. For example, "What do you say when you bump into someone by accident?" You say, "Excuse me." We also use "What do you say?" when we want someone's opinion. "Let's eat sushi. What do you say?"
    0 voted
    January 26, 2012
    1
  • Answered
    There are three ways to talk about the future: will ______ be going to ____ ____ing They have the same meaning: I'll visit my doctor next week. I'm going to visit my doctor next week. I'm visiting my doctor next week. How about this one? I'm visiting my doctor. It could be right now, or it could be the future. In conversation, the meaning will be clear. I ask my friend "Hey, what are you doing next week?" He says, "I'm going to take the kids hiking." I say, "Oh, cool. Where are you going?" He says, "We're camping in Big Bear."
    0 voted
    January 26, 2012
    1
  • Answered
    Usually, we use "on" for flat things: (on T.V., on the grass, on Earth, on the table, on a ship, on a stool) We use "in" we mean "inside": (in a book, in the bathroom, in a rowboat, in China--countries are like rooms, in Los Angeles-cities, too, in his chair--a chair has sides, so you can sit in it.) We use "at" for places. Confusing, right? We can say "at the stadium" or "in the stadium." Both are correct. I'm at the stadium--I'm at that location If my friend calls me and says "Where are you?" I will say, "I'm at the stadium, watching Real Madrid." I'm in the stadium--I'm not outside, I'm inside If my friend calls me and says, "Hey, I'm in the parking lot. Where are you?" I will say "I'm in the stadium. Come inside." This is one of the hardest skills in English. I made a video about some common mistakes, if you want to take a look: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AjQJHkODzq4 Have a good one. -Dan
    0 voted
    January 26, 2012
    0
  • Answered
    I'll give you an example: "Hi, I'm Dan, reporting from Beverly Hills, California. Everyone knows that the recession hasn't hurt all Americans equally. Nowhere is that more apparent than here." What is the meaning of "that"? "Nowhere is (the fact that the recession hasn't hurt all Americans equally) more apparent than here." However, the sentence is still confusing. It is very formal, and uncommon in conversation. If we change the order, the meaning is clearer: "(The fact that the recession hasn't hurt all Americans equally) is more apparent here than it is anywhere else in the world." Basically, Beverly Hills demonstrates the fact better than any other place on Earth. "That" must be a fact that you already mentioned.
    0 voted
    January 25, 2012
    1
  • Answered
    "Frogs' legs" and "frog legs" are both correct, but "Frogs' legs" is the most common. "Frogs" is a plural noun. When we talk about their legs, we need a possessive. When a plural noun ends with "s," we only add an apostrophe: "Frogs' legs" A lot of my students asked me about this English skill, so I made a video about it: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L1hY0_re-1k I hope that it's helpful. "Frog legs" is also correct. We use "Frog" like an adjective, but it's a not an adjective. It's a noun. We call it a noun modifier. "Frog's legs" is incorrect. "Frog" is a singular noun. I could say "A frog's legs" (It means "One frog's legs."). That is correct. However, we usually don't say "I ate one frog's legs last night." A little bit strange, right? Instead, we say "I ate frogs' legs last night." I'm telling you a story about the kind of food that I ate (general), not about one poor frog!
    0 voted
    January 25, 2012
    1
  • Answered
    Both ways are correct. The difference is very simple. "Me" adds more information. Some verbs--gave, sent, asked, told, bought, found--can have two objects: My co-workers bought me a new briefcase because my old one was so ugly! There are two objects--"me" and "a new briefcase." Or, change the order: My co-workers bought a new briefcase for me because my old one was so ugly! Most verbs--washed, experienced, cut, spent--only use one object: Since I lost the bet, I washed his car. We can't add a second object: Since I lost the bet, I washed Jerry his car. (Nooooo! It's wrong.) One object? Two objects? No objects? How do we know? Practice. I made a video with some tips, if you need more practice: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z0oqJpTu7Pw Enjoy! Dan
    0 voted
    January 25, 2012
    1