Search from various English teachers...
Profile
I speak Bulgarian (C2), English (C2), Italian (C1), French and Spanish (both B1-2). I am not really aiming at studying a language, more at tutoring, but if someone is wondering what my aims are - Japanese and a better grasp of both Dutch and Latin (since I have studied them ,but I got nowhere)
Language Skills
EnglishNative
Lesson Feedback
Lesson history
 Last monthLast 3 monthsAll time
Completed lessons000
Attendance rate100%100%100%
Teacher reviews
No record
Activities
  • Answered
    When you have a natural, still valid facts, it doesn't matter if they're said by someone in the past.. Like... The prehistoric men noticed that fire can burn sticks. Or... The prehistoric men noticed that the fire burned the ground. (it has already burned it in the past,so we have nothing left from it for the present.)
    0 voted
    July 27, 2011
    0
  • Answered
    When you want to say that something in the past happened after something else int he past, you put the second in HAD+Verb form. Most times that is a rule and will save you from making mistakes. I say 1st choice is correct
    0 voted
    July 27, 2011
    1
  • Answered
    Like this, it is probably difficult to understand. In reality, there are many ways to say the same thing. You need to know the context and contextual meaning of the verbs that you need. Just like FDmaxey said: putting up gerund or infinitive form can make a change in the meaning of the written text.
    0 voted
    July 27, 2011
    0