Search from various English teachers...
Profile
I don't really know what to write here, but I want to make friends around the world. I moved to Kyoto recently, so I'm mostly looking for Japanese people (especially around Kyoto), but anyone is welcome to write =) I've studied Japanese for two+ years and can speak the language well by now. If you are not confident in using English, my suggestion is that you write in Japanese and I in English, and we both get some practise reading! If you are a bit more confident, maybe we can do the opposite. (Same for Swedish, of course!)
Learning
Japanese
Language Skills
SwedishNative
English
Lesson Feedback
Lesson history
 Last monthLast 3 monthsAll time
Completed lessons000
Attendance rate100%100%100%
Teacher reviews
No record
Activities
  • Answered
    Heh, the formatting completely messed itself up since this was apparently a "comment", not an "answer". Oh well, I posted the same thing in my notebook as well if you want to read it there: http://www.italki.com/entry/538874
    0 voted
    March 29, 2015
    0
  • Posted
    Difference between を, が and は when using ~たい Okay, so I saw a question (http://www.italki.com/question/286761) about which of these three sentences were correct and thought it was kind of interesting: ケーキを食べたい。 ケーキが食べたい。 ケーキは食べたい。 The thing is, all three of those sentences are actually grammatically correct. Depending on what you want to say, you can use different particles to put an emphasis on different things. I'll try to explain it as simple as I can, because I think many people might be struggling with this. ケーキを食べたい。 This one is the simplest one. I want to eat cake. Doesn't imply anything else, you just happen to want to eat cake. ケーキが食べたい。 You put emphasis on the cake here. I want to eat *cake* (as opposed to something else). This is the most common way of using this sentence structure. ケーキは食べたい。 Admittedly, only saying this without the proper context might be a bit incorrect, but it does have some uses. For example, when comparing two (or more) options against each other; ケーキは食べたいけど、アイスクリームは食べたくない。 You could say only ケーキは食べたい if it's a reply to someone asking a question, but what you basically do then is actually leave the "~たくない" part unsaid, because it's insinuated that you don't want the other option(s) (kind of how you drop 私). I hope this cleared things up and that I didn't make it too complicated. I tried to keep it simple, but the last example with は is kind of hard to explain. I know this is not really the intended use of the notebook, but I just wanted to write it down somewhere. If you think I'm wrong, feel free to correct me or add to what I wrote.
    March 29, 2015
    0
    2
  • Answered
    I just want to add a bit to the other answers, because I feel they are not really correct. The thing is, all three of those sentences are actually grammatically correct. Depending on what you want to say, you can use different particles to put an emphasis on different things. Assuming you meant all three as sentences, not questions, here's what they mean: ケーキを食べたい。 This one is the simplest one. I want to eat cake. Doesn't imply anything else, you just happen to want to eat cake. ケーキが食べたい。 You put emphasis on the cake here. I want to eat *cake* (as opposed to something else). This is the most common way of using this sentence structure. ケーキは食べたい。 Admittedly, only saying this without the proper context might be a bit incorrect, but it does have some uses. For example, when comparing two (or more) options against each other; ケーキは食べたいけど、アイスクリームは食べたくない。 Like Delisha mentioned, you could say only ケーキは食べたい if it's a reply to someone asking a question, but what you basically do then is actually leave the "~たくない" part unsaid, because it's insinuated that you don't want the other option(s) (kind of how you drop 私) . I hope this cleared things up and that I didn't make it too complicated. I tried to keep it simple, but the last example with は is kind of hard to explain.
    0 voted
    March 29, 2015
    0
  • Answered
    Good question! I don't think it matters that much. I'd say it's okay to use both, but it depends more on the situation. It's actually a bit like in English, so let me show some examples. "Jag kommer att förklara" is a bit like "I'm going to explain", whereas "jag ska förklara" is more like "I will explain" (only a slight difference). The difference is that "ska" is a bit stronger than "kommer att". It's kind of a bit more determined way of saying the same thing, therefore it's probably better to use "kommer att" most of the time. Perhaps you could say that "kommer att" is a little more predictive, rather than determined. For example; "det kommer att regna imorgon" (it's going to rain tomorrow) is more correct, because you can't be sure whether or not it's actually going to. On the other hand, "jag ska åka utomlands" (I'm going abroad) is showing a strong intention of doing something. If you used "kommer att åka utomlands" instead, it would be more like a notion that might or might not happen (maybe you don't have control over it, like a business trip). There is also a third way of expressing this, and that's "jag tänker åka utomlands", which basically means that you are planning to go abroad (in contrary to "ska", which means you already settled). I know I'm not the best tutor, but I hope this helped you. Feel free to ask me anytime if you have more questions :)
    0 voted
    November 7, 2011
    0