Agree or disagree that some information is too important or too valuable to be shared freely. Take the advantage of technology progressing, most aspect of society in the world have been benefited from it, medical treatment, for example, AI technology, database analysis in science, business and academic research. These big success bringing by progressing which haven’t been imagined in the pass days make it possible to conquer problem, produce useful equipment/months, and further more, alternate our future. Thereby, there could be several reasons why this is a case (is an issue?) and I believe that government, research organization and inventors have right and obligation to protect these knowledge to be share to what extent. Firstly, while many diseases that affect humans have been eradicted due to the improvement and wild-spred use of technology, some of the greatest important information misused have caused deadly damage distributed unlimited accessing. It is without saying haw profound and influence the nuclear weapon have caused on . As the result, I strongly advise that people who will not be allowed to access these crutial knowledge until the correct procedure and usage have been gurranteed. Secondly, no one can doubt that work ethics and morals should be priority any usage of invention and research, since without the constraint of approaching these critical knowledge, it may result unpredictable risk. The first cloned sheep, Dolly, the technologic adventure have allowed researches to transfer these critical information to clone another organs even a whole creature Third, every valuable invention and discovery bast on simgnificant effort, time, anf human resource involved in . people respect these Intellectual property encourage more useful In conclusion, in my view, I agree the statement that depending on the level of how important or valuable information are, the authority of access should be is restricted. (284. for IELTS)