I didn't have my stuff with me remember? Hope u get over it soon. Happy New Year : )

Misplaced my wallet and phone in a mall once, approached the lost and found counter and was informed that a kind stranger had offered to hand them over to the police. Coincidentally the police station was like half an hour away by car from the mall. I was on my own.

I flagged a cab and only told the cabbie about my situation when we were more than halfway through. U should have seen the poor guy's face lol. I felt pretty bad but didnt really have a choice.

@Anders

I'd also like to add that should god decide to reveal himself one day, it would be in full violation of the Principle of Uniformity of Nature. So until then, do we really have a concept of what violating the laws of physics is? Trouble with a claim as extraordinary as the conventional personal god is that, by definition, with all its attributes, it would be impossible to prove or disprove said being without actual observable evidence. My point - I wouldn't totally discount the probability of a god as the prime mover but in the absence of any clear divine revelation, I see no reason whatsoever to even start to believe.

It'd be much wiser to keep a sceptical yet open mind about this issue.

@Anders

Also, regarding your post 'Refuting counter arguments to the existence of a Creator', I have this to say - Given the mysteries of the universe, the age old concept of causality might be wrong for all we know. I'd also like to quote physicist Paul Davies: "Something that "just happens" need not actually violate the laws of physics. The abrupt and uncaused appearance of something can occur within the scope of scientific law, once quantum laws have been taken into account. Nature apparently has the capacity for genuine spontaneity."

Hi, I've read a couple of your blog posts. I apologize beforehand for descending into semantics but I highly doubt ur proof will stand up in scientific circles if you even decide to present it in the first place. The problem with your proof is that it's in fact, under your own admission, an inductive reasoning. We all know the problem with induction. A more appropriate form of proof of something, is documented evidence in favour of it. This sort of proof is a hell lot more unfalsifiable.

Besides, I think you have presented us with a false dichotomy with the reasoning you put forth in the argument - Unknowingly or otherwise, you chose to ignore the possibility of self-causation of the universe. The conditions of the early universe may have been so extreme, such that the distortion of space and time gave rise to a singularity.

Non sequitur. U FAIL.

A word of advice bro, if you wanna get your point across, try speaking with some sense. Being able to read the quran or assemble an IED doesn't help at all.

We're not created from nothing. Who the hell told u this piece of nonsense? Please use whatever cognitive ability ur god has given u.

Hmm I'd stay away from ur kind in real life but thankfully explosives can't hurt me in virtual reality.