[For IELTS] Summarise the information and reporting the main features, and make comparisons. I'm preparing for the IELTS test, if you have any suggestion to my article please let me know. Thank you. :) -- Question: The graph below gives information from a 2008 report about consumption of energy in the USA since 1980 with projections until 2030. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. -- The line graph illustrates U.S. energy consumption by fuel from 1980 with prediction to 2030. Fuel categories are divided into six items: petrol and oil, coal, natural gas, nuclear, solar/wind and hydropower. In general, petrol and oil takes the lead.Coal and natural gas, having the similar trend, follow behind. Next comes nuclear, solar/wind and hydropower. According to the graph, number of petrol and oil went down slightly in 1985 and 1995 but increasing stably after then. With projections, coal will go up and natural gas is going to stabilize after 2020. On average, nuclear occupies five to ten quadrillion units, solar/wind has five quadrillion units and the number of hydropower is under five. Both petrol and oil and coal has apparent growth with ten quadrillion units in five decades. Overall, the rank has no change in these years. The consumption of natural gas, nuclear, solar/wind and hydropower are stable. On the other hand, number of petrol and oil and coal grow.

[For IELTS] Summarise the information and reporting the main features, and make comparisons. I'm preparing for the IELTS test, if you have any suggestion to my article please let me know. Thank you. :) -- These pie charts show average usage of energy in Australian household and the gas emissions in Australian household greenhouse. Ways for energy used are divided into six categories: water heating, heating, refrigeration, cooling, lighting and other appliances. According to the graphs, water heating occupies over thirty percent in both charts, which also takes the lead in greenhouse gas emissions. Cooling and lighting come in fifth and sixth place in both. Heating ranks first place in energy use with forty-two percent but drops to fifteen percent in greenhouse gas emissions. Refrigeration has seven percent usage of energy and doubles in gas emissions. Moreover, other appliances has the same situation with refrigeration, the percentage doubles from energy use to gas emissions. Overall, total percentage of water heating, heating and other appliances is over 75 no matter which parts. The number of refrigeration and other appliance grow apparently. In contrast, water heating, lighting and cooling are stable.

[For IELTS] Discuss both these views and give your own opinion: fixed punishment or not I'm preparing for the IELTS test, if you have any suggestion to my article please let me know. Thank you. :) -- Question: Some people believe that there should be fixed punishments for each type of crime. Others, however, argue that the circumstances of an individual crime, and the motivation for committing it, should always be taken into account when deciding on the punishment. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion. -- It becomes a heated debate that sentence should be fixed or separated for each kind of crime. From my standpoint, I believe the story behind is the most important part of a crime. However, I also understand the demonstrations from opposite. I will discuss both of views in next paragraphs. Some people stick to all criminals must have the same punishments because they believe people born equally so that everyone should have the same regulation to have their second chance. In addition, they choose to ignore the reason. which was causing a crime, even the criminal was under threaten. There is no excuse for a crime, they believe. Despite offender was trying to save themselves, they still need to be sentenced and taught. Each points they insist are based on equality. Nonetheless, I concentrate the story behind a case. There must be some elements to result in a crime and they should be dig out. It will be different if a crime was caused on purpose or without planning. Intentional crime should have heavier punishment due to disrespect. Those people commit a crime for fun without respect others' lives and waste society resource. On the other hand, some people might did the wrong thing under pressure, such as escaping or surviving. For instance, people rob bank for buying drugs or paying surgery fees should have the different sentence since stories behind are not the same. In conclusion, I reaffirm my statement that I support different punishments for individual crime. From my point of view, it is important to sentence according to the reason so that we could have the vulnerable people and punish the real offenders.

[For IELTS] Advantage or disadvantage: charging people for admission to museums I'm preparing for the IELTS test, if you have any suggestion to my article please let me know. Thank you. :) -- Question: Many museums charge for admission while others are free. Do you think the advantages of charging people for admission to museums outweigh the disadvantages? -- It becomes a heated debate that should museums charge for admission. From my opinion, I agree with charging for entering a museum but I also have some suggestions to help those who cannot enter museum due to finance problem. There are some reasons for my standpoints and I will explain them at following paragraphs. Firs of all, I believe some people will support the idea, entering museum without paying money because they think artworks in the museum belong to everyone and all of us has the right to appreciate them for free. Secondly, some of them might declare that it will be an encouragement for people to know more about art if they do not need to pay. These two points benefit to people, however, they forget to mention the shortcoming. The main factor for me to support charging for admission is filtering the crowd. Tickets sold to those who really like exhibitions could prevent their right to enjoy the moment. Avoiding people just want to get into building for air condition and disturb appreciators. In addition, people will cherish this chance to watch this display if they spend money for admission. Meanwhile, for those poor persons and students, museum could offer privilege tickets to them. The money also supports museum to maintain the environment in order to provide a better space to everyone. By the way of conclusion, I reaffirm my statement that I believe the advantage of charging people for admission to museums outweigh the disadvantages. People pay for the ticket for protecting their right to watch the artworks they really love also help preserve museums.

[For IELTS] Summarise the information and reporting the main features, and make comparisons. I'm preparing for the IELTS test, if you have any suggestion to my article please let me know. Thank you. :) -- The pie chart shows reasons to explain how agricultural becomes less productive. Reasons are divided into four categories: over-grazing, over-cultivation, deforestation and other. The table reveals the percentage of land degraded by regions. Regions on the table includes North America, Europe and Oceania. According to the table, land of Europe is degraded the worst, total is 23% and the percentage of deforestation and over-cultivation are the top of these three regions. In the other hand, situation in North America is better. total percentage is 5% and each reason is lower than 4%. It is worth mentioning that even Oceania is ranked second place in the percentage of total land degraded, the number of over-cultivation is 0%. Over all, over-gazing takes the lead on causing of worldwide land degradation, and deforestation follows behind. Next comes over-cultivation and rest is other reason. However, the main reason is based on over-grazing, over-cultivation and deforestation due to these there reasons occupy 93%.

[For IELTS] Advantage or disadvantage: children begin learning a foreign language at primary school I'm preparing for the IELTS test, if you have any suggestion to my article please let me know. Thank you. :) -- Question: Some experts believe that it is better for children to begin learning a foreign language at primary school rather than secondary school. Do the advantages of this outweigh the disadvantages? -- It becomes a heated debate that should children be taught a foreign language be they enter secondary school. In my opinion, I think it will be better for children if they learn other languages earlier. I am going to discuss the reasons why I support the advantage will outweigh the disadvantages. Some people might reject to have second language for their children as primary school. Firstly, parents with this idea usually hope to provide a happy childhood to their kids without pressure of studying and learning. Secondly, they also stand the point that kids should learn their mother language first. They are afraid that it might muddle kids if they know other languages and become a zero sum game. However, potential of children cannot be underestimated. Actually, they could recognize and category languages if they start to learn language when they are young. The pronounce, structure and communication skill will be rooted insight of them. Once they have been taught from their childhood, meanwhile, they will be confident about this language and willing to speak out when they grow up. Learning language earlier also help them gain more acknowledge. From my point of view, culture and history will be a additional gift as people learning language. It will help us to make friends from different countries more easier in the future. To sum up, here I reaffirm my statement is that the benefit of learning a foreign language is more than the disadvantage because language is a window for us to open our mind.

[For IELTS] Summarise the information and reporting the main features, and make comparisons. I'm preparing for the IELTS test, if you have any suggestion to my article please let me know. Thank you. :) -- The maps show the before and after the construction of some infrastructures for travelers. Development makes this island become a resort, which consists of accommodations, restaurant, reception, pier, footpaths and vehicle tracks. More difference of before and after will be described at the next paragraph. The most facilities are mainly located at left side of the island. Fifteen houses are built and divided to two areas: six of them at the left of reception and the others on the right. Almost accommodations settles nearby the sea, except two of them: one is next to the reception and the other one is hided by other two houses. Meanwhile, restaurant is above reception and next to the sea. In contract, pier is at the bottom of this island. Footpaths are set around accommodations and the way from houses to beach. People could go swim in the sea as well. Vehicle tracks are set from pier to reception and restaurant.